I don't mean to be condescending but there is really no point to these rankings if we don't know what we are looking at and how you arrived at these conclusions. For all we know you could be drawing these out of a hat.
My Rankings calculation is based on strength of results to this point in the season. If you win a game in regulation or overtime then you are credited with the opponent's win percentage.
If you lose a game in regulation or overtime, then you are have the opponent's losing percentage taken away from your total.
You are not rewarded nor punished for a shootout result.
The percentage whether it be winning or losing is variable. So if you beat a bad team early in the season, and then they go on a winning streak, then your win over them will have more value as they get better over the course of the season. On the flip side, if you lose to a good team early in the year, then your rating won't get hurt too bad (inverse of winning % will be low) but if they go on an awful slump, then the strength of that loss will become more intense as their losing % increases.
True, just don't get what we're looking at. For example:
Evans Rankings Nightly Top 10
Rank Team (Record, Evans Rankings #)
2 Colorado Avalanche (7-1-0, 3.308)
3 Boston Bruins (5-2-0, 2.077)
4 Anaheim Ducks (6-1-0, 1.798)
5 St. Louis Blues (5-1-1, 1.744)
9 Pittsburgh Penguins (7-1-0, 0.975)
Why would Pittsburgh, with a 7-1 record be below these other teams with worse/same records as them?
Let's compare Chicago, Calgary & Pittsburgh before including any games that have taken place tonight (10/23):
When I calculate the win %, obviously a win is a win and a loss is a loss, so the records you will see in the following comparison are just W-L.
Chicago Blackhawks (7-2, 1.292) through 10/22
Date Opponent (Result, Opponent Record) +/- to ER #
10/1 Washington (W, 4-5) +0.444
10/5 Tampa Bay (L SO) 0.000 (no points deducted for a shootout loss)
10/9 St. Louis (L, 5-2) -0.286
10/11 NY Islanders (W, 3-6) +0.333
10/12 Buffalo (W, 1-9) +0.100
10/15 Carolina (W SO) 0.000 (no points added for a shootout win)
10/17 St. Louis (W SO) 0.000 (no points added for a shootout win)
10/19 Toronto (W, 7-3) +0.700
10/22 Florida (W SO) 0.000 (no points added for a shootout win)
The results are then added up on the Excel spreadsheet where they are listed and then you have their rating number, 1.292. Chicago should obviously have a higher rating but because 3 of their wins have come in shootouts, then they are out of luck for receiving any points for those games.
Calgary Flames (4-5, 0.978) through 10/22
Date Opponent (Result, Opponent Record) +/- to ER #
10/3 Washington (L SO) 0.000 (no points deducted for a shootout loss)
10/4 Columbus (W, 4-5) +0.444
10/6 Vancouver (L SO) 0.000 (no points deducted for a shootout loss)
10/9 Montreal (W, 5-4) +0.556
10/11 New Jersey (W, 1-8) +0.111
10/16 Anaheim (L, 7-2) -0.222
10/19 San Jose (L, 8-1) -0.111
10/21 Los Angeles (W, 6-4) +0.600
10/22 Phoenix (L, 6-4) -0.400
2 of the Flames 5 losses are shootouts, so those are zeros. Their other 3 losses are to 3 good teams, factor in 3 solid wins and 1 win over NJ and that's why they are rated as high as they are.
With Pittsburgh, they have just had terrible luck with their schedule so far. 7 wins, 1 shootout win (0.000), 3 wins over teams whose win % is less than .150. The Tampa win was a great one that was cancelled out by a loss to Florida. (Tampa Bay +0.625, Florida -0.700). They will get some luck coming up soon as they have Boston and Toronto in the coming week. They will also get some help with their rating if some of the bottom dwellers they've beaten so far can start winning.