NHL likely to implement shootouts, other changes

Discussion in 'Fugu's Business of Hockey Forum' started by WVP, Jun 7, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
View Users: View Users
  1. WVP

    WVP Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2004
    Messages:
    13,399
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    84
  2. No, it won't. It'll take all of ONE game before some short-sighted chumps in the media, the front offices, and here online will be whining over-officiating.
     
  3. chiavsfan

    chiavsfan Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2004
    Messages:
    4,426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Radio News Director
    Location:
    Chicagoland, IL
    Home Page:
    It's also an ESPN article, who knows nothing about hockey to begin with...so we will just have to wait an see


    Although everyone else is reporting it, so it's most likely true. Now lets get this pesky CBA out of the way, and things just might be looking up
     
  4. babybruin

    babybruin Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2003
    Messages:
    483
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    computer programmer
    Location:
    vancouver
    Id have to agree. Ill believe it works when I se it. The comments being thrown around now (ie: "it'll be a parade to the penalty box at first, but they'll adjust") were thrown around last time as well. And we all know the result of that crackdown.
     
  5. Crazy_Ike

    Crazy_Ike Cookin' with fire.

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2005
    Messages:
    9,081
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hopefully the view that change is necessary is strong enough now that the dinosaurs' hold on the league will be broken, or at least shaken.

    The best solution would be to tell the coaches in no uncertain terms not to coach that way (or the GMs, who pass it along to the coaches). One assumes the players would be on board since its their salary on the line too now that it's going to be linked. But I suspect there'll still be a few dinosaurs among the GMs and coaches *coughQuinncough*, too many for it to work.
     
  6. Canucks5551

    Canucks5551 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2005
    Messages:
    8,590
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Gender:
    Male
    It is on TSN as well now.
     
  7. Levitate

    Levitate Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2004
    Messages:
    26,004
    Likes Received:
    920
    Trophy Points:
    169
    fans are gonna have to buck up and deal with any crackdown on obstruction without whining like babies. that always came with any attempt by the league to stop obstruction

    "whah whah i don't want to watch a game full of PP's, they need to stop calling so many penalties" :shakehead
     
  8. Bring Back Bucky

    Bring Back Bucky Registered User

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Messages:
    7,969
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Occupation:
    Hamster Trainer
    Location:
    Delicieux!
    Great idea, the shootout. Hey, after a full year of a lockout, why not alienate the traditional hockey fan a little more?? I mean, who needs the longtime hockey fan when you're already packing 11,000 people a night into plenty of venues?? :dunno:
     
  9. Brad*

    Brad* Guest

    How are shootouts after the regular five minute overtime alienating hockey fans?
     
  10. mooseOAK*

    mooseOAK* Guest

    I think that the solution should be that the player sits the whole two minutes and no icing during the PK, that way coaches will refrain from pushing the obstruction game.
     
  11. me2

    me2 Calling out the crap

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2002
    Messages:
    33,379
    Likes Received:
    1,332
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Location:
    Blasting the bull***
    That's sort of what makes sense to me. Possible adjustment is allow a number obstruction fouls (3-5 range per game) after which all obstruction type penalties are the mandatory 2 mins.

    And tell the media to get behind the crackdown. They whine enough about all of the obstruction in the modern game, the least they could do is fully support the crackdown and bite their tongues about parades and penalty boxes.
     
  12. Bring Back Bucky

    Bring Back Bucky Registered User

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Messages:
    7,969
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Occupation:
    Hamster Trainer
    Location:
    Delicieux!

    Do they decide football games with field goal kicking contests?? Baseball games with a home-run derby??
     
  13. Crazy_Ike

    Crazy_Ike Cookin' with fire.

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2005
    Messages:
    9,081
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Who cares what other sports do? If it works for hockey, so be it.

    Time for hockey to stop trying to be like the other guys and just be itself.
     
  14. Volcanologist

    Volcanologist Used Register

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2003
    Messages:
    23,218
    Likes Received:
    828
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Location:
    Toronto
    What?
     
  15. PeterSidorkiewicz

    PeterSidorkiewicz HFWF Tourney Undisputed Champion

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    27,022
    Likes Received:
    3,052
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    Lansing, MI
    No but SOCCER uses the shootout, where the goal of the sport is to put an object in a net. And if im not mistaken, soccer is the most popular sport in the world. Don't get me wrong, I can see WHY people don't like shootouts, because it takes away from the team factor, but im willing to see it tried out. I haven't seen it get any complaints from anyone in the AHL so far. And it will only be used for the regular season and NOT the playoffs, so its a little added spice. I mean soccer has the shootout for its CHAMPIONSHIP games as well.

    I guess im just saying ive never been a big fan of the shootout either, but the NHL has been conservative the past many years with making changes, and this doesn't seem that horrible of a change to me. Why not try it out? What if a lot of people start coming to the games because theyll at least get to see someone go home with a win of some sort?

    My opinion on it is that im willing to give it a try, especially if tons of other hockey leagues use it.
     
  16. ti-vite

    ti-vite Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,086
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    94
    And the one before that, and the one before that...

    They have to do something more drastic like 5 minute majors after your team is called for obstructions 4 times, or, heaven forbid, a penalty shot (cue rants) somewhat like a freethrow in basketball when a player or team (?) exceeds the amount of 'free' fowls avaialble to each (pardon my non-expertise in basketball, but I like the system I sometimes watch more often on TV these days)

    If they try the same old thing like lemmings, of the cliff we go....
     
  17. Bring Back Bucky

    Bring Back Bucky Registered User

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Messages:
    7,969
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Occupation:
    Hamster Trainer
    Location:
    Delicieux!

    That's what's wrong with the nhl today, too much time spent trying to convince people who don't like hockey to watch it.
     
  18. X0ssbar

    X0ssbar Guest

    College football does have a "shoot-out" style system to decide games.
     
  19. Patman

    Patman Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2004
    Messages:
    330
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Ph.D. Student--Statistics
    Home Page:
    ONLY in single elimination cup rounds. I'd figure there is 1 shootout for every 2000 professional matches in the world.

    Real frequent.

    edit: shoot-out comes on and the TV changes the channel. When it stops being hockey I stop watching.

    edit #2: better yet, find me a professional non-hockey league that uses shoot-outs. FYI, MLS did away with them at least 3, maybe even 5 years ago.
     
    Last edited: Jun 7, 2005
  20. ctfan

    ctfan Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    105
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    64
    I hated the idea of shootouts. But I have to admit I enjoyed it this season in the AHL. I say go for it.
     
  21. It's the end of the world!

    BOOOOOOOOOOO shutouts.
     
  22. PeterSidorkiewicz

    PeterSidorkiewicz HFWF Tourney Undisputed Champion

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    27,022
    Likes Received:
    3,052
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    Lansing, MI
    I wonder if there was the same discussion over the forward pass in hockey when it was illegal. "We gotta stick to tradition" and "it wont be hockey if we start passing the puck forward" arguments. Games change all the TIME.

    The shootout wont even be implemented in the playoffs, is it honestly THAT big of a deal? A lot of AHL fans say they enjoy the shootout, so if a lot of people enjoy it, whats so bad about it? Its not that radical of an idea people make it out to be, especially when most NHL fans say the "regular season is meaningless anyway", which I disagree with, but its said over and over again.
     
  23. SedinFan*

    SedinFan* Guest

    Shootouts aren't bad, but they must only be in the regular season. Not in the Playoffs.
     
  24. I think all these people crying about tradition and the shootout are unbelievable drama queens. If you don't like it don't watch it. They do it in Europe in the AHL, what's wrong with it? The team losing in the shootout will get the point anyway, if it's like they did in the AHL. The only problem I have with it is that it cheapens an actual penalty shot a bit, but other than that what's there to lose?
     
  25. Patman

    Patman Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2004
    Messages:
    330
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Ph.D. Student--Statistics
    Home Page:
    The big deal? The shoot-out isn't a little thing, the overtime loss point is not a little thing (we all saw how that didn't work). Just because its change does not make it a positive event. I'm sorry if placating ESPN for a loadable 5 second clip to cut hockey to a total of 4 minutes of hockey for an hour isn't my favorite part of the day. I love how people treat it as both inevitable and will be in hindsight the greatest thing for the sport. That's just plain stupid. I'm damn glad that I won't be foolish enough to pay $50 to see a contest end in a near random skills competition which effectively sells a 60-65 minute product on the two minute after a game is over. This is about selling hockey and the shootout is not hockey.

    I mean, the Americans clearly love the shootout so much that the MLS stopped using it. Lets repeat that... a fringe sport in the US (as most people tell me hockey is fringe)... stopped using the shootout when they realized it pissed off the very same people that pay them lots of money in season tickets and merchandise. The MLS realized they had to stop pandering to those who don't care and focus on the real fans. The NHL still doesn't see this.

    Let's just skip 3 years of that and pre-emptively eliminate the shootout.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"