NHL in Seattle?

Discussion in 'Fugu's Business of Hockey Forum' started by TheSpaceCoyote, Apr 25, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. TheSpaceCoyote

    TheSpaceCoyote Sens fan in NL

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    Messages:
    1,536
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Rand McNally
    Why hasn't the NHL tried a team in Seattle? It's larger than other cities currently supporting NHL teams (DC, Nashville, Long Island, etc), has a stadium (wherever the SuperSonics used to play) and would only need to compete with the Seahawks (first half of the season) and the WHL teams in the area.
    There are junior teams in Washington state doing well so it wouldn't be unrealistic to expect a team in Seattle to do fairly well (at least compared to other teams failing to draw crowds currently in the NHL)


    MOD: Also, Dolemite's earlier historical thread: http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?t=810679
     
  2. headsigh

    headsigh leave at once!

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    9,867
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Postal Service
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Home Page:
    what would be the point
     
  3. halincandenza

    halincandenza Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    7,185
    Likes Received:
    259
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Seattle doesn't want the NHL.
     
  4. TheSpaceCoyote

    TheSpaceCoyote Sens fan in NL

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    Messages:
    1,536
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Rand McNally
    To take a team out of a failing market and move it to a city where it has the potential to make money?
     
  5. KingJet*

    KingJet* Guest

    I don't think its a bad idea, but wait till Quebec, Winnipeg, Hamilton at least have a team.
     
  6. Sorge Georos

    Sorge Georos Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2009
    Messages:
    3,026
    Likes Received:
    218
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    LI
    The Sonics moved out BECAUSE of the arena, so it's not going to draw a team in.

    Portland, on the other hand, seems to have a fine arena and is a great sports city.
     
  7. Sadekuuro

    Sadekuuro Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2005
    Messages:
    5,785
    Likes Received:
    331
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Occupation:
    mad scientist
    Location:
    Seattle
    Some of us wouldn't mind, but yeah, you're basically right. It's absolutely a Seahawks and Mariners town--nothing else rates.
     
  8. Finlandia WOAT

    Finlandia WOAT Bench Carr

    Joined:
    May 23, 2010
    Messages:
    20,127
    Likes Received:
    11,405
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Occupation:
    a watchmaker
    The arena in Seattle is specifically modified so it can only support basketball.
     
  9. Sorge Georos

    Sorge Georos Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2009
    Messages:
    3,026
    Likes Received:
    218
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    LI
    And it couldn't even do that...
     
  10. LickTheEnvelope

    LickTheEnvelope 7th Overall is my jam

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    32,017
    Likes Received:
    785
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Location:
    Vancouver
    No arena.

    Seattle had the Supersonics for basketball and were moved because the city of Seattle refused to put up any money what so ever to help build a new arena (which could have hosted hockey as well) and thus they lost their NBA team.
     
  11. RogueRider

    RogueRider Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2011
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    North Windham, ME
    Portland has a better shot.
     
  12. vt89*

    vt89* Registered User

    Joined:
    May 6, 2010
    Messages:
    896
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    its not that big of a city and is stretched three ways between the UW, the Mariners and the Seahawks.

    I'd like to see it looked in to but i doubt it will happen
     
  13. The Dayvan Cowboy

    The Dayvan Cowboy Registered Genius

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    7,781
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I have a friend who is a huge sports fan in Seattle, and I love to visit the area.

    The biggest problem is the lack of an arena and the City of Seattle hating sports teams, and building things for them.

    My friend is positive that an NHL team in Seattle would be welcomed very similarly to how the Sounders FC has been since their inception in the MLS. Between UW, the Mariners, and my Seahawks, Seattle is a town that just has accomplished sweet **** all in the world of sports, and at least for (I would estimate) a decade the city would likely embrace a team that isn't awful as sin.

    But, like it has been said, the arena is the biggest issue. I would rather have a team in Seattle than any other city, but that may have something to do with me wanting to live in Seattle for a bit.
     
  14. ChumpyG

    ChumpyG Jibbity jibbity

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Messages:
    2,735
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    sound guy
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Key Arena is a dump. Terrible arena for hockey.

    Rose Garden in Portland is a much better arena, and is set up better for hockey (i.e. seats all the way around, not the horseshoe crap the Key had for hockey). The Sonics moved mainly because the Key sucked and the city wouldn't do anything to improve it. Hell, their WHL team moved 30 miles south because of the same reasons.

    Portland Panthers anyone? :sarcasm:
     
  15. CanadianHockey

    CanadianHockey Smith - Alfie

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2009
    Messages:
    30,380
    Likes Received:
    318
    Trophy Points:
    154
    Location:
    Petawawa
    Home Page:
    Proximity to Vancouver could help generate ticket sales, but I'm not to what extent that would be. That said, an arena would still be an issue for Seattle.

    Portland seems like the other logical US city option.
     
  16. sushinsky4tsar

    sushinsky4tsar Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2002
    Messages:
    804
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Edina, MN
    Home Page:
    http://www.nhlconnection.ca/westernconference/pacificdivision/phoenixcoyotes/in-pursuit-of-an-nhl-franchise/

    It has an ice configuration. It's just not viable for anything more than a temporary home. Kind of like a Conseco or an America West. There would definitely need to be plans in place for a replacement. However, I think the NHL has seen worse temporary homes.

    I'm kind of in the group that thinks Portland/Rose Garden makes more sense for the NHL. Seattle should definitely get the Sonics back before plunging in to the NHL. I think Vancouver belongs in the NBA too for that matter.
     
  17. HTFN

    HTFN Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Messages:
    6,071
    Likes Received:
    1,658
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Fun part about Portland and the Rose Garden is that the Memorial Coliseum, literally a three minute walk from the Garden, is where the Winter Hawks play. Not really relevant, but nice.

    I live here, and I'd like to see a team here, but at the same time I don't know if I could put up with it if they blundered like Phoenix and nobody showed up. The Winter Hawks get their support, and the Blazers (and Timbers) get a ton, but I don't know. That said, Portland has proven to me, time and time again, to be a great sports city (with admittedly very few sports). The MLS support in this city is unreal.
     
  18. Pinkfloyd

    Pinkfloyd Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2006
    Messages:
    57,992
    Likes Received:
    4,073
    Trophy Points:
    220
    Occupation:
    Government Employee
    Location:
    Roseville
    Need an owner and an arena for any place to have a legitimate opportunity at an NHL team. That's why Winnipeg is discussed first and foremost. They have both for the purposes of the NHL. There are places with one and not the other. There are places with the raw population for it. Nobody but Winnipeg and soon Quebec City that have both in line. The only American cities that have potential for housing a team in the near future are Portland, Kansas City, Milwaukee, Orlando, and Houston. All of those places have ownership questions.
     
  19. Pinkfloyd

    Pinkfloyd Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2006
    Messages:
    57,992
    Likes Received:
    4,073
    Trophy Points:
    220
    Occupation:
    Government Employee
    Location:
    Roseville
    Don't the Winterhawks split the games in those two arenas?
     
  20. HTFN

    HTFN Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Messages:
    6,071
    Likes Received:
    1,658
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Yeah, the Rose Garden isn't exclusively the Blazers', nor is the Coliseum the Winter Hawks', but it's the Coliseum that has most of the Winter Hawks Alumni banners hanging around, and likely coincidence, but most of the games I've been to have been in the Coliseum. I'm not quite certain what the split ratio is, but yeah, they'll play games in either.
     
  21. Big McLargehuge

    Big McLargehuge Let's Go Exploring

    Joined:
    May 9, 2002
    Messages:
    69,503
    Likes Received:
    1,989
    Trophy Points:
    232
    Location:
    S. Pasadena, CA
    No arena and no prospective owner...talks end there. I think it would be a decent option to put a team. One needs to be put in the Pacific Northwest...it's a barren market.

    Portland is a better option, though. Less competition and a better sports town, to say nothing of an arena that could support an NHL team tomorrow...no owner there either, though. Paul Allen dominates that city and he's shown no interest in a NHL team since he lost out on the Penguins 12 years ago.
     
  22. Grudy0

    Grudy0 Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,863
    Likes Received:
    117
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Location:
    Maryland
    Seattle was granted an NHL expansion team back in 1976 along with Denver, but the person that owned the WHL Totems couldn't get the financing. With Denver receiving the KC Scouts in 1976, that expansion was put on hold.

    Then along came the 1991 expansion, the one where Tampa Bay and Ottawa were granted franchises. The NBA Sonics ownership had the application for the NHL expansion franchise in their name, and when it came time to present to the NHL Expansion Committee, the Ackerley's withdrew the application. The Ackerley's were then able to get the City of Seattle to reconfigure Key Arena into a basketball-only configuration, sealing the deal keep the NHL out of Seattle.
     
  23. worstfaceoffmanever

    worstfaceoffmanever These Snacks Are Odd

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,948
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Location:
    Fargo, ND
    And Portland has very little chance unless Paul Allen has changed his mind about owning a hockey team.
     
  24. WingsFan95

    WingsFan95 Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Messages:
    3,261
    Likes Received:
    149
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Occupation:
    Office Job
    Location:
    Toronto
    Exactly, and after Portland.
     
  25. Made Dan

    Made Dan Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    14,497
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    131
    Location:
    The Bronx, NY
    Maybe after Winnipeg/Quebec...maybe even Portland.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"