hockeykicker
Moderator
- Dec 3, 2014
- 35,179
- 12,780
A bit of context would be nice why is this relevant?
The idea of the suspension to the player is to punish the player specifically. Suspensions from the league aren't (generally) intended to punish the team that the individual plays for. If it was the leagues intention to punish the team, they would fine the team in conjunction with the fine to the player. So it is unsurprising to see the league take this course of action.
As if Caps are innocent. They just gave the most reckless player an extension and they field him willingly.The idea of the suspension to the player is to punish the player specifically. Suspensions from the league aren't (generally) intended to punish the team that the individual plays for. If it was the leagues intention to punish the team, they would fine the team in conjunction with the fine to the player. So it is unsurprising to see the league take this course of action.
if this is true, why does the NHL not do this with every suspended player? I can't think of another time they've done this for a team. Also teams should absolutely be punished for employing players who get themselves suspendedThe idea of the suspension to the player is to punish the player specifically. Suspensions from the league aren't (generally) intended to punish the team that the individual plays for. If it was the leagues intention to punish the team, they would fine the team in conjunction with the fine to the player. So it is unsurprising to see the league take this course of action.
Dont ask. Let the indignation and sanctimony continue.But why?
if this is true, why does the NHL not do this with every suspended player? I can't think of another time they've done this for a team. Also teams should absolutely be punished for employing players who get themselves suspended
I don't really see how that is relevant. The arbitrator/Bettman isn't going to overturn the entire suspension, so having the roster status remain unchanged while the process plays out doesn't seem to harm anyone.Not surprised as other have noted Torres received this. It also worth noting that he is contesting the suspension so this would also make sense with that being a part of this. Both Wilson and the Caps disagree that he should be suspended this long and he is appealing that. So can you punish a team that is hoping for a third party ruling that you're dragging your feet on like the Wideman situation? When you hand this over during that process at least the team has less to gripe about.
The fact that Wilson's appeal hasn't already been heard by the third party is ridiculous. Having Bettman wait a month to rubber stamp something we can all assume he rubber stamped in the first place before going to the arbitrator is really a bad look on the league.
I don't really see how that is relevant. The arbitrator/Bettman isn't going to overturn the entire suspension, so having the roster status remain unchanged while the process plays out doesn't seem to harm anyone.
Also your complaints about process are pretty nonsensical. For one - most media-types seem to be in favor of the suspension, so I don't see how that's a "really bad look" for the league. Second - the process is one that was negotiated in the CBA, so if the NHLPA has an issue with it they should have put in some habeus relief or something.