Bergeron, Marchand, Pastrnak & Debrusk were all playing through injuries and every single person on these forums thought they were, to a man, all below their usual standards, especially at even strength. The Bergeron & Krejci lines had tougher matchups than the Coyle line most of the time. Just saying I find it interesting that you specifically picked those guys to compare him to and not his own linemates. Coyle & Johansson are better comps for Heinen on this playoff run because all 3 guys were healthy, playing on the same line against the same competition with somewhat comparable TOI. Johansson produced more at ES in fewer ES minutes and fewer games. Coyle only had about a minute more ES TOI than Heinen per game & dramatically outproduced him. Like...that line as a whole far exceeded expectations and basically carried the team through to the finals and somehow Heinen still underperformed offensively.
I just don't get the need or desire to spin an a 24-2-6-8 performance in the playoffs as anything more than mediocre, especially given that it was worse than his regular season output.