News Article: NHL announces rules changes for 2014-15 season

HockeyGuy73

Registered User
Oct 29, 2010
554
12
Tad south of STL.
http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=730165&navid=nhl:topheads


NEW YORK -- The National Hockey League announced today a series of rules changes for the 2014-15 season, following approval earlier in the summer by the League's Board of Governors and the National Hockey League Players' Association:

Rule 1.8 – Rink - Goalkeeper's Restricted Area

The trapezoid will be expanded by two feet from the goal post on both sides of the net.

Rule 23 – Game Misconduct Penalties

A new Game Misconduct category will be created. Clipping, charging, elbowing, interference, kneeing, head-butting and butt-ending move from the general category into the same category as boarding and checking from behind ("Physical Fouls"), whereby a player who incurs two such game misconducts in this category would now be automatically suspended for one game.


Rule 24 – Penalty Shot

The 'Spin-O-Rama' move, as described in Section 24.2 of the 2013-14 NHL Rule Book, will no longer be permitted either in Penalty Shot situations or in the Shootout.

Rule 38 – Video Goal Judge

Video review will be expanded in the following areas:

* Rule 38.4 (viii) has been modified to allow broader discretion to Hockey Operations to assist the referees in determining the legitimacy of all potential goals (e.g., to ensure they are "good hockey goals"). The revised Rule will allow Hockey Operations to correct a broader array of situations where video review clearly establishes that a "goal" or "no goal" call on the ice has been made in error. The new expanded rule will also allow Hockey Operations to provide guidance to referees on goal and potential goal plays where the referee has blown his whistle (or intended to blow his whistle) after having lost sight of the puck.

* In reviewing "Kicked in Goals," Hockey Operations will require more demonstrable video evidence of a "distinct kicking motion" in order to overrule a "goal" call on the ice, or to uphold a "no goal" call on the ice.

Rule 57 – Tripping

The rule relating to "Tripping" will be revised to specifically provide that a two minute minor penalty will be assessed when a defending player "dives" and trips an attacking player with his body/arm/shoulder, regardless of whether the defending player is able to make initial contact with the puck.

But, in situations where a penalty shot might otherwise be appropriate, if the defending player "dives" and touches the puck first (before the trip), no penalty shot will be awarded. (In such cases, the resulting penalty will be limited to a two-minute minor penalty for tripping.)

Rule 64 – Diving / Embellishment

The supplementary discipline penalties associated with Rule 64.3 (Diving/Embellishment) will be revised to bring attention to and more seriously penalize players (and teams) who repeatedly dive and embellish in an attempt to draw penalties. Fines will be assessed to players and head coaches on a graduated scale outlined below.

Incident # Player Fine(s) Head Coach Fine(s)
1 Warning N/A
2 $2,000 N/A
3 $3,000 N/A
4 $4,000 $2,000
5 $5,000 $3,000
6 $5,000 $4,000
7 $5,000 $5,000
8 $5,000 $5,000

Rule 76 – Face-offs

To curb delay tactics on face-offs after icing infractions, in situations where the defending team is guilty of a face-off violation, following an icing, the defending player who is initially lined up for the face-off will be given a warning, but will be required to remain in the circle to take the face-off. A second face-off violation by the defending team in such situation will result in a two minute minor bench penalty.

Rule 84 – Overtime

* Teams will switch ends prior to the start of overtime in the regular season.

* The entire ice surface will undergo a "dry scrape" prior to the start of overtime in the regular season.

* The procedure requiring the head coach to submit a list of the first three shooters in the shoot-out has been eliminated.

Rule 85 – Puck Out of Bounds

There have been further rule changes made relating to face-off location to avoid penalizing teams for plays intended to create bona fide scoring opportunities. Specifically, the following are "categories of plays" where face-offs will remain in the attacking zone despite the fact that the attacking team was technically responsible for the stoppage in play: Shots at the net by a player on the attacking team where: (i) the shot breaks the glass; (ii) the shot goes off the side of the net and deflects out of play; (iii) the shot goes off the dasher boards or glass and deflects out of play; (iv) the shot is tipped or deflected out of play by a teammate; and (v) the shot becomes wedged in or on the exterior of the goal net.

In addition, the following rule change will be enacted for the 2014 preseason and may be continued for the 2014/15 regular season if approved by the League and the NHLPA.

Rule 1.9 – Rink – Face-off Spots and Circles – Ice Markings/Hash Marks

The hash marks at the end zone circles will be moved from three feet apart to five feet, seven inches apart (international markings).
 

SirPaste

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 30, 2010
14,122
61
STL
Trapezoid just needs to go, other than that I'm fine with all the changes
 

2 Minute Minor

Hi Keeba!
Jun 3, 2008
15,615
124
Temple, Texas
why ban spin-o-rama?!

I've always thought it should be illegal anyway, since the players forward momentum stops with the spin. For whatever reason, refs set a precedent of not calling it. I think this ruling is more consistent with the spirit of the original rule....just clarified.
 

Dr Robot

Registered User
Nov 3, 2011
1,457
1,116
Took me a minute to understand the reference to tripping. The diving they are referencing is when someones on a breakaway and the defender dives next to them to tap the puck. Now even if the defender touches the puck first before tripping up the player its still a 2 minute minor. Ive got no problem with the removal of the spinorama, it was always an exception to the rule that didnt make sense.
 

BlueOil

"well-informed"
Apr 28, 2010
7,076
4,082
Thrilled they got rid of the spin-o-rama, should have been illegal awhile ago.

Was really hoping they'd address the delay of game penalties. I don't expect them to remove them, but I was hoping they'd add some discretionary clauses to it so it's not so automatic. At least remove the penalty when it's tipped out of play.
 

Note Worthy

History Made
Oct 26, 2011
10,114
3,722
St. Louis, MO
Thrilled they got rid of the spin-o-rama, should have been illegal awhile ago.

Was really hoping they'd address the delay of game penalties. I don't expect them to remove them, but I was hoping they'd add some discretionary clauses to it so it's not so automatic. At least remove the penalty when it's tipped out of play.

I think an over the glass delay of game should be treated like an icing. Faceoff in the teams defensive zone and that team cannot make a line change. That's punishment enough, I think.
 

BlueOil

"well-informed"
Apr 28, 2010
7,076
4,082
I think an over the glass delay of game should be treated like an icing. Faceoff in the teams defensive zone and that team cannot make a line change. That's punishment enough, I think.

I like this idea. Teams are already hesitant enough to ice the puck so I think this would be a good solution to a dumb penalty.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad