LadyStanley
Registered User
Gotta start somewhere.
Perhaps next location will demand a change in nickname in exchange for tax/rent concessions?
Perhaps next location will demand a change in nickname in exchange for tax/rent concessions?
"FedEx Field is a concrete relic of stadiums past"
This building opened in 1997 and was most recently renovated in 2012.
The Texas Rangers will leave22 year old stadium is old? But I’ve heard about the ones in Carolina and Tennessee that needed or need major renos and those are about the same age as fedex field.
22 year old stadium is old? But I’ve heard about the ones in Carolina and Tennessee that needed or need major renos and those are about the same age as fedex field.
If they do build a new one would it make sense to go back to the site of rfk? DC united moved to the much more appropriate Audi Field last season so no major tenant left at rfk.
22 year old stadium is old? But I’ve heard about the ones in Carolina and Tennessee that needed or need major renos and those are about the same age as fedex field.
If they do build a new one would it make sense to go back to the site of rfk? DC united moved to the much more appropriate Audi Field last season so no major tenant left at rfk.
No Redskins fan I've ever talked too says they like FedEx Field so nothing short of building a new stadium will surprise me.
I don't know about Tennessee but the Panthers stadium underwent a significant renovation about 5 years ago that saw new scoreboards and escalators installed.
For the Rams in St. Louis, it was a requirement in the lease that the building be in the top third of stadiums (by what metric, I have no idea). Because it wasn't, it gave Kroenke the out to get to LA.I’ve been to the stadiums in Carolina and Nashville. And while it’s true that they lack some of the latest bells and whistles, they’re FAR from being obsolete as venues. A simple remodel is all that’s needed. Some of this stuff is just one-upsmanship getting out of control.
For the Rams in St. Louis, it was a requirement in the lease that the building be in the top third of stadiums (by what metric, I have no idea). Because it wasn't, it gave Kroenke the out to get to LA.
I'm not saying every city was stupid enough to put a clause in the lease like this, but who knows the stupid **** some mayor 20 years ago agreed to when they were trying to lure a professional sports team?
I will be fair to Rangers here. While I still do not believe city should pay for it, there are worse reasons to ask for new building than needing a roof so their fans dont get cooked under the sun in Texas, in July.The Texas Rangers will leaveThe Ballpark in ArlingtonAmeriquest Field in ArlingtonRangers Ballpark in ArlingtonGlobe Life Park - built in 1994 - in Arlington for Globe Life Field next year. Insufficient luxury/club boxes? No fancy scoreboards? Lack of virtually on-the-field seating? Poor audio/video options around the concourses and such?
Nope. No retractable roof, and no easy way to put one on. 25-year old stadium, otherwise up-to-date in many other ways, getting re-purposed [downsized] while a brand new stadium gets built with the retractable roof at a cost of at least $500 million.
Don't underestimate the ability of pro sports teams to figure out ways to make existing stadiums obsolete.
I will be fair to Rangers here. While I still do not believe city should pay for it, there are worse reasons to ask for new building than needing a roof so their fans dont get cooked under the sun in Texas, in July.
There’s no market he can take them that will be worth more than the DC area. Not St. Louis, Sam Antonio or anywhere like that.Not to be political, but George W. Bush “ran” the team then, so he was the dim bulb that was good with an open air stadium in Texas summers.
FedEx was designed for maximum revenue extraction. No video boards because you’d rent a gimmick to hold in your hands to watch replays while juggling your drink and dog. Then mobile phones happened.
Snyder can go pound sand. The league will charge him a fat fee to let him move, he’ll wind up having to finance it without DC money behind it and the NFL would expand there the following week for $1bn and pay for the new building.
There’s no market he can take them that will be worth more than the DC area. Not St. Louis, Sam Antonio or anywhere like that.
If we’re talking new stadium then I think they will head back to the site of rfk and tear that down and build over it.
FexEd Field is just a giant money pit. Fans don't like it because it's way too expensive.
Bank of America Stadium is far from obsolete on the inside. Bank of America Stadium suffers from a major parking problem that's only getting worse as uptown Charlotte continues to grow. When the stadium was built, there were tons of gravel lots that accommodated a sell-out crowd with ease. Now there are less than half those spaces, the costs have increased 1000% in some cases, and not to get overly political, but our absolutely asinine city council people and county commissioners actually think people will ride bicycles and scooters to NFL games...
Personally I like taking the light rail to games, I do this with Hornets games too. It's not right off the line so there's some long walking involved but for reasons you stated it's better than driving Uptown searching in vain to find a place to park, and then paying to park. And this is just my opinion, but the Panthers tailgate scene is kind of weak. It's way more fun to tailgate in Raleigh for Hockey.
The thought of taking those ****ty city scooters to the stadium makes me laugh, but I'm sure there's someone who loves it so what the **** do I know?
Ask them if they'd like it better if someone other than the Redskins were playing there. Alternatively, ask them if they'd like it better if Dan Snyder wasn't the owner.No Redskins fan I've ever talked too says they like FedEx Field so nothing short of building a new stadium will surprise me.
As a Redskins fan all I want is for this to happen. FedEx is a terrible looking stadium in a bad spot. No one likes it! Snyder do something nice for us, just this once!