You're a character. I'll take Jim McMahon, but I'm older.Well, I wasn't going to post about Cutler, but.... Cutler was the best Bears QB in living memory of most fans posting here. Literal factual statement. By the way, that's not a compliment. That's a statement of fact about akin to stating that I'm the strongest male in my household, which means I'm #1 over a five month old baby and a nine year old cat. Literal factual statement as well.
Cutler being the best QB in Bears history is winning the tallest midget contest.Well, I wasn't going to post about Cutler, but....
Cutler was the best Bears QB in living memory of most fans posting here. Literal factual statement.
By the way, that's not a compliment. That's a statement of fact about akin to stating that I'm the strongest male in my household, which means I'm #1 over a five month old baby and a nine year old cat. Literal factual statement as well.
If they could have gotten Mack without giving up that 2020 1st I'd be much more on board. If Mitch plays well and looks like a keeper in 2019 the 2020 1st doesn't matter much. The success or failure of the Mack trade is all riding on the right arm and brain of #10.
I disagree. The Bears ability to win a super bowl is riding on #10, but the Mack trade is a huge success already and will continue to be regardless.
I disagree. The Bears ability to win a super bowl is riding on #10, but the Mack trade is a huge success already and will continue to be regardless.
I think that Mack alone isn't enough to get them into the Playoffs, let alone the Super Bowl. If they fail to at the very least make a SB appearance it's a loss in my book. JMO.This.
I think that Mack alone isn't enough to get them into the Playoffs, let alone the Super Bowl. If they fail to at the very least make a SB appearance it's a loss in my book. JMO.
Mack alone gets them from 4-6 wins to 7-9. I can't see them getting any further unless Mitch takes a huge step forward. Otherwise it is gonna be Lovie's Bears all over again.100% disagree.
Mack alone gets them from 4-6 wins to 7-9. I can't see them getting any further unless Mitch takes a huge step forward. Otherwise it is gonna be Lovie's Bears all over again.
Yeah, but if you have some horrible injury luck it could end up top 5 so we dont know. Put it in worst case Scenario form: is Mack worth a top 5 and a top 12 pick in your opinion?Mitch means nothing in relation to the trade. Mack is worth a 2 mid 1st round picks all days including the days that don't end in Y.
Mitch means nothing in relation to the trade. Mack is worth a 2 mid 1st round picks all days including the days that don't end in Y.
Yeah, but if you have some horrible injury luck it could end up top 5 so we dont know.
Even moreso with Pace's first round track record...
I'm not complaining, I'm saying that a lot rides on that 2020 pick.I can't believe there's a poster complaining about the deal for Khalil freaking Mack. Unreal.
I'm not complaining, I'm saying that a lot rides on that 2020 pick.
This next game is at home for a potential 3-1 start....
IF Mitch blows chunks again at home, he's gonna hear heavy Boo's and there WILL BE calls for him to get benched. Especially if the Bears lose a close game at home cause the offense can't score.
Everyone assumes that Trubisky will be competent enough to keep them out of the top 12 in 2020. I don't, and I think he could be bad enough that they pick there anyway. The 2019 1st doesn't matter because they were using it on an edge rusher anyway. When Mack was holding out, I was all for trading for him as long as it didn't cost 2 1st round picks. It cost 2 1st round picks. Don't get me wrong, it is still a decent trade, but that 2nd 1st is where it gets dicey.You basically are though.