I know we get a full season, but we did trade a prospect for a year of Haula. It always depends on the value I think.
I do think they would try to key in more on term or someone they can sign as well, though.
I think this fits into the “having a good feeling about re-signing the player narrative.” Stylistically, Haula is tailor made for how the Canes play. As long as he’s not asking for crazy money or term, I pretty much expect they’ll find a way to fit him in for the next few seasons. Maybe something like $5.5M x 3yrs or something. All bets all off if Haula goes for 30+ goals, who knows how much that version of Haula costs.
I personally think they’ll end up keeping Haula and 1 of Edmundson or TVR without too many headaches cap-wise. It will get very interesting in 2 years when they’ll need to give Svechnikov and Hamilton huge raises tho. I think the development of Priskie and Bean will go along way to decide which of the steady 3rd pair guys to keep. Bottom line there is that I don’t think this coming off-season will be anywhere near as exciting than this past one.
Also, I suppose I should caveat my thoughts about the braintrust not going after rentals. I don’t think for a second they’d give up a prospect like Bean, for example, or one of their 6 picks in the top 3 rounds of the 2020 draft for a guy that would more likely than not walk after a playoff run. Now something like a 4th or Roy-level prospect, that really doesn’t have a future in the org anyway, is fair game, provided a need is met. They’re so deep at all levels now though, I just don’t seem them needing to or even considering paying rental prices.