News & Notes XXIII: Brindy Beats the Team Into Shape

Status
Not open for further replies.
May 23, 2016
2,991
10,236
Raleigh, NC
Getting Mason on a PTO and giving him a look in pre-season wouldn't be an awful idea. Yes its another wildcard, but with three of them somethings got to give. At the least it adds more competition.

https://thehockeywriters.com/predicting-professional-tryouts-2018/
Carolina Hurricanes
PTOs: Steve Mason (G), Freddie Hamilton (RC/RW)

ANALYSIS: Carolina is another team with uncertain goaltending. Petr Mrazek is slated to platoon with Scott Darling, but Mason could be better than both of them. If the Hurricanes are serious about taking a step forward, bringing in another proven goalie on a PTO makes a lot of sense. If Darling or Mrazek aren’t up to the challenge, they could be buried in the minors, providing new owner Tom Dundon is willing to “waste” a bit of money.
The Hamilton brothers played together briefly in Calgary and Dougie apparently wasn’t happy when Freddie got sent down to AHL Stockton. The Hurricanes wouldn’t be making any promises or offering a one-way contract, but extending Freddie a PTO might be a good way to make Dougie feel more at home in his new surroundings.
 

GoldiFox

Registered User
Apr 21, 2014
13,287
32,030
Getting Mason on a PTO and giving him a look in pre-season wouldn't be an awful idea. Yes its another wildcard, but with three of them somethings got to give. At the least it adds more competition.

https://thehockeywriters.com/predicting-professional-tryouts-2018/

Carolina Hurricanes
PTOs: Steve Mason (G), Freddie Hamilton (RC/RW)

ANALYSIS: Carolina is another team with uncertain goaltending. Petr Mrazek is slated to platoon with Scott Darling, but Mason could be better than both of them. If the Hurricanes are serious about taking a step forward, bringing in another proven goalie on a PTO makes a lot of sense. If Darling or Mrazek aren’t up to the challenge, they could be buried in the minors, providing new owner Tom Dundon is willing to “waste” a bit of money.
The Hamilton brothers played together briefly in Calgary and Dougie apparently wasn’t happy when Freddie got sent down to AHL Stockton. The Hurricanes wouldn’t be making any promises or offering a one-way contract, but extending Freddie a PTO might be a good way to make Dougie feel more at home in his new surroundings

Sad truth right there. One could make an argument that goalie with half a dozen concussions last year who can't find a job is legitimately better than both of the Canes current goalies.

Related to Freddie Hamilton - why repeat Calgary's mistake?
"Calgary brought in Dougie's brother who isn't very good and it really pissed Hamilton off when they sent him down. It was just a giant nepotism disaster with difficult personalities involed....
...
...
You know what we should do is bring in Freddie Hamilton on a PTO to make Dougie feel good. No way that can backfire"
 

MinJaBen

Canes Sharks Boy
Sponsor
Dec 14, 2015
20,854
80,424
Durm
Getting Mason on a PTO and giving him a look in pre-season wouldn't be an awful idea.

I'm going to argue that it might be a bad idea. With any other position, a PTO is fine because it doesn't steal any significant reps from the guys that will be playing on your team in the fall, but at goalie, giving Mason a game or a period of a game, or even one of only two nets on the ice in practice, is a much bigger commitment. I'd rather not PTO him, but give Ned and Booth more time if we want to see what options we really have.
 

DaveG

Noted Jerk
Apr 7, 2003
51,175
48,453
Winston-Salem NC
I'm going to argue that it might be a bad idea. With any other position, a PTO is fine because it doesn't steal any significant reps from the guys that will be playing on your team in the fall, but at goalie, giving Mason a game or a period of a game, or even one of only two nets on the ice in practice, is a much bigger commitment. I'd rather not PTO him, but give Ned and Booth more time if we want to see what options we really have.
Can't disagree with that. Would much rather give them a chance and put in a waiver claim on young guys like Dansk, Lyon, Pickard, Sparks if Ned/Booth show they're not ready by the end of the pre-season. If there's any team with a potentially crazy/shitty enough goalie season to pick one up and justify carrying 3 until early season showings play out it's us.

Do not want to bring in Hamilton's brother. I would think a more low-pressure atmosphere combined with a less jockish room like we have here would be enough of a good start in itself. Don't need to bring in his brother to inevitably have to cut him and risk pissing off the guy we just acquired.
 

Chrispy

Salakuljettaja's Blues
Feb 25, 2009
8,286
26,636
Cary, NC
If we want to bring someone into camp, I'd rather see what kind of pick Toronto is looking for to deal Pickard to guarantee the Canes get him and give him some time in camp.

I don't feel like Ned or Booth will be ready this year, so while exhibition games will help them some I'd rather get a third goalie in to provide more competition.

I'm also fine rostering 3 goalies at the start of the season as insurance against a bad start by either Mrazek or Darling. We could use a conditioning stint to get a goalie some games in Charlotte to shake the rust off if two are playing well.
 

MinJaBen

Canes Sharks Boy
Sponsor
Dec 14, 2015
20,854
80,424
Durm
I'm also fine rostering 3 goalies at the start of the season as insurance against a bad start by either Mrazek or Darling.

In theory this sounds good, but with so much of the goalie game mental, I wonder if doing this just creates more problems with all three guys just "looking over their shoulders" all the time? I know guys in the NHL shouldn't be that way, but everything I've seen from both Mrazek and Darling tells me that neither has the strongest mental fortitude in the world and that having that third guy would hurt their play.
 

Navin R Slavin

Fifth line center
Jan 1, 2011
16,206
63,566
Durrm NC
In theory this sounds good, but with so much of the goalie game mental, I wonder if doing this just creates more problems with all three guys just "looking over their shoulders" all the time? I know guys in the NHL shouldn't be that way, but everything I've seen from both Mrazek and Darling tells me that neither has the strongest mental fortitude in the world and that having that third guy would hurt their play.

Yup.

Some Mason level goalie will be available at some point during the season. If they're both shitting the bed, replace one of them then.
 

ONO94

Registered User
Jan 18, 2010
821
1,457
In theory this sounds good, but with so much of the goalie game mental, I wonder if doing this just creates more problems with all three guys just "looking over their shoulders" all the time? I know guys in the NHL shouldn't be that way, but everything I've seen from both Mrazek and Darling tells me that neither has the strongest mental fortitude in the world and that having that third guy would hurt their play.

That shouldn't matter in Carolina--all of the goalies here are used to looking over their shoulders....
 

Chrispy

Salakuljettaja's Blues
Feb 25, 2009
8,286
26,636
Cary, NC
In theory this sounds good, but with so much of the goalie game mental, I wonder if doing this just creates more problems with all three guys just "looking over their shoulders" all the time? I know guys in the NHL shouldn't be that way, but everything I've seen from both Mrazek and Darling tells me that neither has the strongest mental fortitude in the world and that having that third guy would hurt their play.

So Mrazek and Darling wouldn't be looking over their shoulders at each other, but would at a third goalie who was picked up for next to nothing or off waivers and is in the press box?

I don't think that holding the door open on the bench is that much better of a spot than the press box, but I'm open to being corrected.
 

spockBokk

Registered User
Sep 8, 2013
7,122
17,864

Blueline Bomber

AI Generated Minnesota Wild
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2007
39,153
40,814
I noticed something odd about our schedule for this year. Out of 41 home games, only 1 falls on a Wednesday night. And only 3 games total take place on Wednesday.

Now I know weekday games typically draw lower than weekend games, but I wonder if Wednesday games draw lower than other weekdays.
 

My Special Purpose

Registered User
Apr 8, 2008
8,151
21,787
So Mrazek and Darling wouldn't be looking over their shoulders at each other, but would at a third goalie who was picked up for next to nothing or off waivers and is in the press box?

I don't think that holding the door open on the bench is that much better of a spot than the press box, but I'm open to being corrected.

Having three NHL goalies on the roster during the season is a horrible idea. It kills practice time, creates chaos, and doesn't help stop pucks. It will not create additional competition, but it will take *everyone* out of their routines. It's one of those ideas that sounds better than it works.
 

GindyDraws

I will not disable my Adblock, HF
Mar 13, 2014
2,889
2,177
Indianapolis
As a Caniac who doesn't live in the Triangle, I'm buying ESPN+ this season because I know we'll get at least 10 games due to them likely having to use the "less glamorous" teams to make that service worth it.

For the 38th season, NHL on NBC will only have ONE game featuring Svechnikov.

*Road game? Check!
*Game against a team with NBC Sports affliliate? Check!
*Potentially pre-empted due to Carolina being out of playoffs? Most likely.
 

geehaad

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 24, 2006
7,512
18,876
I noticed something odd about our schedule for this year. Out of 41 home games, only 1 falls on a Wednesday night. And only 3 games total take place on Wednesday.

Now I know weekday games typically draw lower than weekend games, but I wonder if Wednesday games draw lower than other weekdays.
They've had a *very* low amount of Weds games for decades.
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,209
138,590
Bojangles Parking Lot
I noticed something odd about our schedule for this year. Out of 41 home games, only 1 falls on a Wednesday night. And only 3 games total take place on Wednesday.

Now I know weekday games typically draw lower than weekend games, but I wonder if Wednesday games draw lower than other weekdays.

I bet they do. Nobody want to go out late on a Monday or a Wednesday.

For whatever reason, Tuesday seems to be the target for early-mid-week activities, not just for the Canes but for just about everything else. I can’t tell you how many conflicts I’ve had with Tuesday games.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad