SoundwaveIsCharisma
Moderator
I like it, if he proves that his bright spots are something that he can do consistently we can always re-up him for another couple of years. It's nice and short term if other players outplay him.
Damn, was hoping we get some term. Dont want to lose him for nothing in the off season.
It's unlikely, but not impossible, Avs would be looking to trade him at trade deadline. They'd have to be out of it by then, healthy and figure Alt/Lindholm/Timmins/Meloche can fill in if needed.
Why, what's the big deal about that? Avs got him for nothing.
As others have said we could do far, far worse for a #6. Going into his UFA year I think it is likely we'll see the best Nemeth possible.
That shouldnt matter in the evaluation. Imo he was super solid last year, hes still in his prime so his play should not drop off. Hes an asset, not necessarily easy to replace, we got very fortunate. Oleksiak just got a 3 year deal, i feel nemeth is about just as good.
Y'know I don't necessarily disagree with much of your post, I'd even agree to an extent with the Oleksiak comparison, but I'd say the Pens made a mistake inking him to a multi-year deal. He's nothing special apart from being a really big guy and that you can invite his Olympic champion sister to the rink and maybe do a pep talk.
When you throw out terms like "prime" and "drop-off," I think you're ignoring the fact that his upside wasn't that great to begin with. I don't mean to **** on him, but he's got very limited utility. He's average at best defensively, and he's positively AWFUL with the puck on his stick. The whole "icing on the cake" jokes didn't come from nowhere. He's a very good stopgap measure who did way more than what was expected of him, but a stopgap measure nonetheless.
I just think the overall notion of every player on an expiring deal having to be flipped for something, anything, is more than a little overblown. It's why I hate the term "asset management." There's not gonna be some huge market for him at the deadline. Losing him for nothing is not that big a deal, especially since (and yes, it absolutely should matter as part of the evaluation) he was gotten for nothing.
He doesnt need to have big upside, he can play the same way as last year and still be worth 2.5 minimum. Cole just got 4 mill from us while being 3 years older, more likely to drop off at year 31 than Nemeth at 28. Nemeth imo was just as good last year, with a lower risk of drop off, so he could get more than Cole.
Can you explain why its okay to lose a waiver pickup for nothing, if that waiver pickup played much better than expected and is valuable asset? Just because you picked up a diamond in the rough (a little exaggerated here obviously) doesnt mean we should let them walk. Panarin was a undrafted free agent, doesnt mean he is worth any less.
Well for the record I don't love the Ian Cole signing. But I think he's better than Nemeth, including last year.
Again, I just don't think the Avs will be taking a huge step back if they lose a stopgap measure in free agency, especially since they gave up nothing to get him in the first place. Our respective evaluations of the player himself seem to differ a bit here. He was the right guy at the right time last season, and filled a very large gap in the lineup. But I think he's replaceable. If all things go according to plan (I know, I know) then he's the 7th guy in this lineup as is.
Zadorov - Johnson
Cole - Barrie
Barberio - Girard
Nemeth
Alt
If there's a demand for him, hey, go ahead and get something decent for him. I just don't think there is.