PatrickMcC
Registered User
- May 24, 2015
- 839
- 154
Proven more ...Has more experience against top line players...Like i said its close but for us he is the better fit ATMCan someone give me an argument for why Turris is better?
Proven more ...Has more experience against top line players...Like i said its close but for us he is the better fit ATM
But Kadri faces harder competition, and has worse linemates. He does that with equal to better shot rates & production 5v5. Plus he's one of the better "pests" (that manages to not cross the line).
Powerplay they're pretty equal (based on points alone), and they both aren't primary penalty killers.
At best I'd say Turris is equal to Naz, but including injuries, age, and contracts, it gets a lot more clear I'd prefer Kadri.
But Kadri faces harder competition, and has worse linemates. He does that with equal to better shot rates & production 5v5. Plus he's one of the better "pests" (that manages to not cross the line).
Powerplay they're pretty equal (based on points alone), and they both aren't primary penalty killers.
At best I'd say Turris is equal to Naz, but including injuries, age, and contracts, it gets a lot more clear I'd prefer Kadri.
Turris has better linemates? lol ok man i dont see Marleau on this wing here. At best Turris is much better than Kadri actually, he has been a way better playoff player he actually plays a first line role, he is much better positionally. Put Turris in Toronto's system then put Kadri in Ottawa's and id love to see the point total difference.
I love how you say 38-year old Marleau is his best linemates as if that's a good thing.. He's not good anymore.
Positonally? Lol.
Playoffs? Small sample size for Nasty Naz.
Kadri plays harder comps and comes away with better shot rates, and production.
I don't see the case.
Kadri has surpassed Turris and is quite a bit better in just about every metric while playing with generally worse linemates. Plus he brings an element of grit (and durability) which Turris does not. He's quite hated on these boards though so I could see him losing the poll.
Can someone give me an argument for why Turris is better?
I love how you say 38-year old Marleau is his best linemates as if that's a good thing.. He's not good anymore.
Classic undersell.
Biased because I own his jersey but I pick Turris, he has scored some clutch goals for the Sens in the playoffs. That's the difference for me since their other numbers are pretty even.
Turris is better defensively and is actually super clutch in the playoffs. He doesn't disappear at all. He's a good lockeroom team guy.
Kadri is a very good player but Turris is also getting better. Kadri is a good player though and its not like he is a lot worse than him but If you traded Turris for Kadri the Sens would not be a better team.