Eklund Rumor: Nashville- Toronto- Rangers
- Thread starter Avilaj07
- Start date
GAGLine
Registered User
- Sep 17, 2007
- 23,368
- 19,163
If every Eklund rumor is going to start with "I know it's Eklund, but", maybe we should just stop posting his rumors.
ottomaddox
Registered User
2 for 6 deal possibly?
They might lock this thread up.
It seems unlikely that NSH are part of TWO 3-way deals in 1 season .
They might lock this thread up.
It seems unlikely that NSH are part of TWO 3-way deals in 1 season .
That's not even a 3-way trade. That's two trades from the NYR, one to Nashville and one to TO. Unless TO and Nashville swap assets, which you haven't mentioned...
Liferleafer
TSN Scrum Lurker
- Feb 9, 2011
- 39,848
- 13,005
Thank God the Leafs are out on McDonagh.
Avilaj07
Registered User
- Feb 6, 2016
- 1,988
- 1,461
In his report, he doesn't mention any other assets besides the 2 mentioned above, he on states it would be a 3 team trade which then I would assume Nashville or Toronto would be receiving assets from one another
he has no sources ....and Toronto management doesn't leak anything ..or your fired lol
Number1RedWingsFan52
Registered User
Don't see McDonagh in Toronto he's pretty much linked to either Boston or Tampa, Already know about Nash to Nashville makes sense for both Nash and Nashville.
DopeyFish
Mitchy McDangles
- Nov 17, 2009
- 6,625
- 4,726
perhaps doing a 3 way trade between Nash/Tor/NY makes sense as... toronto is at 50 contracts... NYR is at 48... Toronto would be moving out potentially multiple contracts so having Nashville with 43 helps a complicated trade
so if there is a trade in the works involving the 3... it may just be 2 separate trades bound together in order to make the contracts work within the limit...
with that said, it's Eklund so it's unlikely.
so if there is a trade in the works involving the 3... it may just be 2 separate trades bound together in order to make the contracts work within the limit...
with that said, it's Eklund so it's unlikely.
Lion Hound
@JoeTucc26
He'd be a pretty good fit. Not sure why you'd be thanking God on that.
Liferleafer
TSN Scrum Lurker
- Feb 9, 2011
- 39,848
- 13,005
Because i don't want to deal a bunch of youth for a quick fix....that's why.
scared as to what the leafs would give up if this was true. maybe eklund is just exaggerating
Last edited:
Liferleafer
TSN Scrum Lurker
- Feb 9, 2011
- 39,848
- 13,005
Liferleafer
TSN Scrum Lurker
- Feb 9, 2011
- 39,848
- 13,005
1.5 years left. Quick fix....trading youth for older pieces....quick fix. The possibility of paying a 30 year old player a massive contract? Not interested.
He basically means that Toronto would only have him for 18 months and are incapable of signing him after his contract is up.
uncleben
Global Moderator
I think Liferleafer is implying that McDonagh would not stick around past the end of his contract, which is believable as his contract expiration aligns with Marner and Matthews', and McDonagh is going to want a raise, so it'll be tought to fit everyone.
NYR Gets:
2018 1st Nas
2018 1st Tor
2019 2nd Tor
Aberg
Lilijgren
Soshnikov
NAS Gets:
Nash
Martin (50% retained)
Tor Gets:
Mcdonagh(50% retained)
NYR 3rd 2018
2018 1st Nas
2018 1st Tor
2019 2nd Tor
Aberg
Lilijgren
Soshnikov
NAS Gets:
Nash
Martin (50% retained)
Tor Gets:
Mcdonagh(50% retained)
NYR 3rd 2018
SensFactor
Registered User
Why would you not want Ryan Mcdonagh? he is the piece the Leafs need, add him and you are a legitimate contender, and I personally think they are already.
Liferleafer
TSN Scrum Lurker
- Feb 9, 2011
- 39,848
- 13,005
A. Cost to acquire (will be to high IMO)
B. 1.5 years until he is 30 and due a monster contract
C. I don't think he makes us a contender
ACC1224
Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
- Aug 19, 2002
- 73,657
- 39,076
McDonagh would be an excellent pickup depending on the cost. Can't think of a better suited player for the Leafs needs.
Ad
Upcoming events
-
Pinguins Bremerhaven @ Eisbaren Berlin - Eisbaren Berlin leads series 2-1Wagers: 2Staked: $400.00Event closes- Updated:
-
-
-
-
