- Nov 17, 2011
- 7,651
- 2,518
I've already said that Montreal and Nashville seem likely for the next two teams.
While I do understand one poster's view against reusing the Expos name in Montreal, I think at this point Montreal won't accept any nickname but the Expos.
And with my proposed 4-league alignment giving the AL the same 8 cities it had from 1955-60, the NL the same 7 cities it had from 1953-57 (with Miami replacing the 2nd NYC team, thus 15 AL and NL teams are all in Northeastern and Midwestern markets that were in MLB at some point between 1901-57), the new Continental League containing the 8 other Eastern/Central markets that first gained an MLB team after 1960, and the Mountain/Pacific teams in the new Pacific Coast League, I think MLB will prosper under this setup, given that PCL teams only would have to play three 3-game series in interleague play east of the MTZ (one in each league on a rotating basis) and the ET/CT teams only have to play one 3-game series west of the CTZ interleague.
The Continental League would be the only league long-term to include non-US teams, and ultimately when MLB is at 48 teams (12 in each league), the CL would have 3 teams in Eastern Canada (Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto) and one team in Mexico City, a first for the big 4 sports leagues.
Have you had some conversations with the Commissioner about your 4-league proposal?