Whoshattenkirkshoes
Registered User
- Aug 11, 2014
- 3,818
- 1,620
I'm going with no. The list is pretty flawed.Just curious, have you seen all of these guys play? I like the list a lot
I'm going with no. The list is pretty flawed.Just curious, have you seen all of these guys play? I like the list a lot
Michael Rasmussen is way too far down your list. He will be in the NHL next season. He's going to surprise some people.
Filip Hronek is too far down your list.
Jake Bean is ranked too high. Complete bust.
Connor Timmins is way too far down the list. IMO he's a better prospect or on equal ground with Makar. I don't get the separation. Probably your worst ranking.
Tyler Bertuzzi is ranked way too low. He's established himself already.
Kale Clague needs to be higher
Sam Steel needs to be WAY lower
Laczynski should be mentioned? Why haven't you?
Dennis Cholowski is going to be a top 4 defensemen in the NHL and he's not even mentioned? Why?
Martin Necas should be lower than he is.
Yes it is early and I don't have the time to pick apart your whole list so I am admitting I have missed a lot, but seriously your list needs some work. The only proof to this will be time. The list obviously would be ever changing as teams prospects develop.
I'm going with no. The list is pretty flawed.
Do you actually see Pettersson as the top prospect or is there a little bit of bias in there? Not trying to be rude just wondering
We won't know for 4 years. I will save this and PM youI'd love to see your list. You are way off base on a few of your claims that I can tell you must not watch a lot of prospects. Timmins is the same level as Makar. Yikes
Username Canucks20
Elias Pettersson ranked #1...
Yup, no bias at all
Thanks for the constructive input. And who would you have as the number 1 prospect?
Välimäki really low.
Disregarding Liljegren, there are at least a couple of Finns I would pick Välimäki over. Probably just a lack of exposure.55 spots under Liljegren, whom he was selected before and looked better than on a weaker Finnish team. Hey. It’s expecred.
Pettersson's scoring at a historical rate so...Heiskanen
Michael Rasmussen is way too far down your list. He will be in the NHL next season. He's going to surprise some people.
Filip Hronek is too far down your list.
Jake Bean is ranked too high. Complete bust.
Connor Timmins is way too far down the list. IMO he's a better prospect or on equal ground with Makar. I don't get the separation. Probably your worst ranking.
Tyler Bertuzzi is ranked way too low. He's established himself already.
Kale Clague needs to be higher
Sam Steel needs to be WAY lower
Laczynski should be mentioned? Why haven't you?
Dennis Cholowski is going to be a top 4 defensemen in the NHL and he's not even mentioned? Why?
Martin Necas should be lower than he is.
Yes it is early and I don't have the time to pick apart your whole list so I am admitting I have missed a lot, but seriously your list needs some work. The only proof to this will be time. The list obviously would be ever changing as teams prospects develop.
Michael Rasmussen is way too far down your list. He will be in the NHL next season. He's going to surprise some people.
Filip Hronek is too far down your list.
Tyler Bertuzzi is ranked way too low. He's established himself already.
Laczynski should be mentioned? Why haven't you?
Dennis Cholowski is going to be a top 4 defensemen in the NHL and he's not even mentioned? Why?
Well, let's see what he can do with his current size first...And he’s underweight by nhl standards.Just image what more he can do with 15/20 lbs
There are quite a few d-men ahead of Hronek on the list that don't have much argument to be. Carlsson and Myers for example. Guhle is ranked #35 and has 2 more points in 1 more game, in his D+3 year while Hronek is in his D+2, and relative to their teammates Guhle is much less impressive. But feel free to make a counter-argument if you actually know what you're talking about.Or maybe you are overrating your team's prospects?
Fox is a better prospect than both of them, no argument there. Can’t see why Bean is so high though, he’s heading towards bust territory.I’d love to hear a convincing argument for why Jake Bean, Adam Fox or Gabriel Carlsson are better prospects than Hronek and Cholowski. Or how Rasmussen is behind half the players ahead of him.
List seems biased towards high profile prospects and WJC appearances/performance more than anything else.