Hamilton35
Registered User
- Jan 21, 2009
- 87
- 0
The age factor is almost nil here. Prince is 3 and half months older. As for comparing their rookie year stats (even tho you knock stats), I dont think you can ignore the development that Prince has made. He came into this season with an extra 15lbs of muscle on his frame. Not only is he bigger, but imo this helped improve his speed. He is by far one of the fastest players in the league with the puck.
Also, you cant call him a soft playmaking winger. Do you think Martindale and Toffoli are going to go to the corners or stand in front of the net? Not a chance. Hes the grit on the big line.
It definitely helps to play with skill players, but Toffoli and Martindale had very average starts to the season before Prince joined the line. Toffoli had 22pts in 16 games before they played together after Sarnia. Martindale had 24 in 18. Prince was leading the team before this. Since putting them together they have all seen a big increase in production. Stats dont show everything, but they do mean something. Not like we are trying to say a 40 point player is better. We are talking about a kid in 2nd.
When you say Catenacci is a more complete player, the only way I see how is because he is a Centre and has more responsibility defensively. Prince has shown much more flash, determination, and high end skill in the offensive zone than I have seen in Catenacci.
I would take the top 6 potential of a Shane Prince over the safe pick of a Dan Catenacci.
Also, you cant call him a soft playmaking winger. Do you think Martindale and Toffoli are going to go to the corners or stand in front of the net? Not a chance. Hes the grit on the big line.
It definitely helps to play with skill players, but Toffoli and Martindale had very average starts to the season before Prince joined the line. Toffoli had 22pts in 16 games before they played together after Sarnia. Martindale had 24 in 18. Prince was leading the team before this. Since putting them together they have all seen a big increase in production. Stats dont show everything, but they do mean something. Not like we are trying to say a 40 point player is better. We are talking about a kid in 2nd.
When you say Catenacci is a more complete player, the only way I see how is because he is a Centre and has more responsibility defensively. Prince has shown much more flash, determination, and high end skill in the offensive zone than I have seen in Catenacci.
I would take the top 6 potential of a Shane Prince over the safe pick of a Dan Catenacci.