Proposal: Muzzin to Detroit

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
15,148
9,939
Don't like it for the rings. Can't imagine LA says no to Tatar, nearly 4 straight 20+ goals seasons.
 

YP44

Registered User
Jan 30, 2012
27,092
7,441
Calgary, AB
fair value but not what I would want for Muzzin. Given the expansion draft I want a forward who does not need protection and a pick. Pick depending on talent level and readiness of forward.

After expansion if LA does not lose McNabb than I would re-look at.
 

go4hockey

Registered User
Oct 14, 2007
6,190
2,430
Alta Loma CA
fair value but not what I would want for Muzzin. Given the expansion draft I want a forward who does not need protection and a pick. Pick depending on talent level and readiness of forward.

After expansion if LA does not lose McNabb than I would re-look at.

Completely agree with you on this one. That is the same return I would be looking for.
 

go4hockey

Registered User
Oct 14, 2007
6,190
2,430
Alta Loma CA
What would it cost to send Forbort to Detroit?

We will not be moving Forbort (or any of the other rookie defenseman). If your looking to LA for a defenseman it would be either Muzzin or Amart as we can trade one of them for forward help and use the money saved to sign our own guys or a bit more scoring help. It would make no sense to develop Forbort only to trade him the year he shows he can be a good defenseman in the league.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad