...moving on.Yeah but no. People are talking about who Danault is as a player in general, you're the one not catching on here.
...moving on.Yeah but no. People are talking about who Danault is as a player in general, you're the one not catching on here.
...moving on.
1st overall or high pick usually do turn team around but winning the cup is a other story also not every 1st overall are equal...Washington won with a 2004 1st overall 14 years later.
Pittsburgh won with 2 1st overall+2 2nd overall 3 years after their last top 2 pick.
Chicago won their first cup 3 years after Kane.
If our prospects all boom like the ones on these teams did, we may have a chance. The majority of the 1st overall don't turn the team around.
So... Lehkonen-Domi-Gallagher were very good together
Tatar-Danault-Suzuki were excellent aswell.
That leaves us with Drouin-KK-Weal and then Hudon-Cousins-Armia ? Byron takes hudon’s spot when he comes back.
Current line up expected :
Lehkonen-Domi-Gallagher
Tatar-Dumb player-Suzuki
Drouin-KK-Weal
Byron-Cousins-Armia
Hudon/Thompson
Mete-Weber
Chiarot-Petry
Kulak-Fleury
Folin
then just change your story and write that he's playing 20 minutes and gets 80 points .Crazy all the stuffs we need to explain hereHe didnt though. He did exactly what I said hed do. Play 13 minutes a night and produce 30 points. Its crazy how right Ive been so far on Kotkaniemi. Its like Im actually writing the book.
That would be great. Ill start doing this.then just change your story and write that he's playing 20 minutes and gets 80 points .Crazy all the stuffs we need to explain here
Thank you . I would like to return the compliment but ... well , i can'tThis is lazy. So lazy. I can assure you that a lot of people on this board have understanding of hockey that rivals actual pros.
Eller > Danault
It’s never over
Danault has eclipsed my boy EllerEller > Danault
It’s never over
Does guy who said that watch our other player who was 3rd overall? Probably doesn’t seem him much cuz the camera follows the puck and he’s nowhere near it.I can’t respond to the comment in the other thread but for the person saying we expect more from a 3rd overall pick (KK) wouldn’t be faire to him, i mean he’s playing what 14min only during 5v5 with 3rd liners so yeah don’t expect him to go end to end every shift a la mcdavid, it’s not gonna happen AND he’s the youngest guy on the squad btw, it feels like a lot of people forget that
You are one of the very few who are frustrated with it. Most people realize Danault has limitations in a top C role.I wasn't disagreeing with you...
The whole Danault conversation is frustrating to no end
Ask Edmonton gas about 1st overall picks and success1st overall or high pick usually do turn team around but winning the cup is a other story also not every 1st overall are equal...
You are one of the very few who are frustrated with it. Most people realize Danault has limitations in a top C role.
Top line centers generally don't play under 18 minutes a game... you make it sound like they're giving him 25 minutes and masses of powerplay time.
I can realize he has limitations while also understanding that he isn't playing a role he isn't suited for, which also happens to NOT be a top C role. I can also understand that he's clearly either a great third line center or a good second line center, but don't see why we need to plug two really young guys in his stead right now.
Why are you being so dense? Everyone knows that Plato learned everything he knew about hockey -Wait-- what did Plato say according to you?
Can you offer me a related source?
You might want to go read up on the Dunning Kruger effect.Just because those executives have the job it certainly doesn't mean they deserve them. There are incompetents in all walks of life. Every large organization has them. In most cases they are good at maintaining relationships with people with power. That doesn't necessarily make them good at their jobs.
And let's not forget that the owner himself doesn't seem to be particularly knowledgeable about the game either. This is a guy who re-upped with his GM on a five year deal TWO YEARS before his current one expired. That is absolutely ridiculous.
The sad fact of the matter is that there are several posters on this site who probably would've done a better job than our current mgmt has. If nothing else they wouldn't have been stupid enough to hire Therrien as coach.... let alone keep him around as long as MB did.
The one thing MB has demonstrated is an ability to sucker an owner into giving him a long undeserved extension.
He can hit the organist from ice level more often than Danault.Eller is bigger, that's about it. I can't honestly think of anything else Eller is better at.
Or the Peter PrincipleYou might want to go read up on the Dunning Kruger effect.
Top line centers generally don't play under 18 minutes a game... you make it sound like they're giving him 25 minutes and masses of powerplay time.
I can realize he has limitations while also understanding that he isn't playing a role he isn't suited for, which also happens to NOT be a top C role. I can also understand that he's clearly either a great third line center or a good second line center, but don't see why we need to plug two really young guys in his stead right now.
Toi/GPA top line center plays on the team top line and gets the most minutes.
Who the best LW? Oh, Tatar? Damn.
Whos the best RW? Oh, Gally? Hot diggity were onto something.
Who plays the most minutes DRUM ROLL .... Phil the not so thrilling Danault!