The Flyers havent finished bottom 5 since 2007, and before that i honestly cant even remember it. Our forward group is not in nearly as dire shape as you seem to think. Ill try to explain for you.
giroux is a 1C, and with the addition of Patrick, we shouldnt be a one trick pony anymore. Teams will have to play more than one line, so that should help his points. Even if it doesnt, he still shelters Patrick and lets him learn the ropes. In 2-3 Years, Patrick takes over as 1C, and giroux slides to 2C, which is a pretty good option. Couturier continues to play 3C.
Down the Road, if Frost or Rubstov develop into middle 6 Cs as well, we can move Giroux to RW where he plays very well.
Our board is relatively split on Simmonds. Great player and i love him, but his next contract could be deadly for a 30 year old power forward. Its no guarantee he'll be around. Konecny can shift back overto his natural side on the RW.
Voracek plays a smart game, and will likely continue to be productive for several years. Hes the person im least concerned about. He trained with Jagr while Jagr was here, and took a lot of his mannerisms. I think hell keep himself in good shape.
So even in 3 years, we could Still be
Lindblom - Patrick - Voracek
Frost - Giroux - Konecny (not actual lines, just as an idea)
With both couturier and Rubstov around, as well as Ratcliffe, and plenty of good looking bottom 6'ers to choose from (allison, NAK, etc.). The Flyers are in no risk of being 'bad' in the forward department, and thats with me probably forgetting a guy or two.
We also have 2 firsts next year (Ours and Blues), and if we trade simmonds next year, will get at least one more back for an additional one in 2019.
Really, we appreciate your concern about our poor forward outlook, but i assure you, we're in good hands.
so basicly even if you named a couple of prospects here and there. patrick is nothing sure and as failed to be healthy at such a young age. but you even stated above that you're future still relies on Giroux and voracek performing, giroux isnt too good 5v5 and as regressed in his last 3 season and is turning 30 this season @ 8.2M till he's 35. if he doesnt get his game back and still go on the regress its realy not gonna look good. on the other hand i do agree with voracek he's the type of player who will likely play the same game till his mid 35, highly skilled puck possession player. Giroux on the other hand ... and if patrick doesnt deliver... it could turn bad. never been high on Nolan patrick and i think he's very similar to Couturier