No. Nobody would've been upset about a backup for a 5th rounder proposal.Had someone posted this yesterday, everyone wouldve gone like :
"Oh my gawd MTL fans nobody want your thrash"
"You guys are always making ****ty proposals"
"Why don't you add Halak + Ryder + 2nd"
"Montoya has negative value"
and so on...
...And I would have agreed with all of the above
Thank god there's a few worse GMs than Bergevin.
We don't know if he would have been waived. More likely he would have taken over as backup and Niemi would have hit the wire instead, and I for one would give up a 5th round pick to ensure that we have Montoya instead of Niemi, who actually is one of the worst goalies in the NHL.For a goalie who would've likely been waived otherwise, yeah it's still something.
If it was most teams, nobody would be saying anything negative, but a lot of people love to crap on certain teams on this board (Edmonton, Toronto, Montreal, etc).How is it that anyone in this thread is taking a passionate stance on the transfer of a 5th rounder for a backup goalie? Pretty incredible.
How is it that anyone in this thread is taking a passionate stance on the transfer of a 5th rounder for a backup goalie? Pretty incredible.
Nice, usually that's one of the only rounds we draft well !!!!!!!
It's not but this is a terrible post.This is a terrible trade for the Oilers.
Or a 7th?Seems like a high price for a guy who would have hit waivers. I don't mind the pick up, but is someone going to tell me a 6th wouldn't have got it done?
You mad or something ? Marc Bergevin IS putrid we agree on that. Paying for Montoya is idiotic as well though, even a 5th. For the record, I wish we kept Subban, Radulov and Markov, so Bergevin isn't exactly any kind of hero to me
If you look at each trade Bergevin has made on its own, they're usually pretty good. It's when looking at the big picture where he does a horrible job and has no idea what he's doing.
Bakersfield is for development...not the Oilers. LB needs to be playing games to develop...not sitting on the bench until his name gets called maybe once a month.I hate this deal for wasting a pick, contract spot and development time for our young goalies. Better options for cheaper were available all year too.
Ya, but Wedgewood had less NHL experience than LB ...and isn't all that much better than him..Montoya is barely adequate. But a 4th or 5th doesn't have the buying power HF thinks they do.
This is a win for Montreal. But that doesn't make it bad for Edmonton. The only problem from Edmonton's side is that they didn't do this sooner. Arizona paid the same price for Wedgewood 2 months ago. Brossoit lost like 6 games between then and now. I wonder how many points a real backup could have salvaged.
FTFY. He's an aging goaltender, coming off a concussion, with worse stats than that Croissant guy.Montoya is asolidbackup goalie that will contribute in some way.
There is no way for Bergevin to be classed anywhere near an elite GM.Agreed but if he rounds out his GM game and starts living in the present instead of the past, he would put it all together and become an elite GM. If he leaves Montreal he'd be a great reclamation project for a franchise. Especially for a team that already has established centres.
I guess you could say Bergevin would be a bargain for another team.
He can't be much worse. Brossoit was good for a bad goal per game. He single handedly lost us a few games. Brossoit just isn't ready for the NHL. Montoya just needs to be able to be competent, and he has been in recent years.Bit of a ? move IMO. Can't see Montoya being any better than Brossoit.
Worse stats in 4 games. Pretty small sample size. The concussion is a legit concern though.FTFY. He's an aging goaltender, coming off a concussion, with worse stats than that Croissant guy.