Moosetache
Registered User
since those are the two UFA's I'd be most interested in, please give me your thoughts on those options.
If you think "other", please say who and why.
If you think "other", please say who and why.
Assuming Slavin and Pesce continue their growth, and knowing we're bringing in Hamilton to create an excellent defensive core for at least the next 3 seasons, I think we could end up being one of those franchises that makes a goalie look a lot better than he might actually be, based on the play in front of him. You know about the struggles of a team like Philly and Winnipeg over the long haul because their defense routinely hung their goalie out to dry, and with a subpar player in net, things went to shit. Its no coincidence the second that Philly shored up its D (at least for a brief time) with Pronger, they were able to ride Michael Leighton to Game 6 OT of the Stanley Cup Finals.That said, coming off of 11 years of the same goalie, maybe I need to change my expectations. Not every franchise does the whole “find your goalie for the next 5 years” thing. Maybe we are the next franchise in the Philadelphia, Winnipeg, St Louis, Calgary mold to just awkwardly keep trading Brian Elliott and Steve Mason to each other.
(And, compared to what we’ve gotten from our goaltending the last three years, I’ll take that.)
I like Mrazek as a 2nd goalie. I still think he has a lot of talent I'd he can put it all together.
Lehner
Halak
Mrazek
Are my 3 goalie target s assuming Darling is moved out.
trade for Varlamov, sign Hutton or re-sign Ward to back him up, Darling to back up Helvig for the Everblades.
The addition of Hamilton has done very little to give CAR a better defensive defense. Pronger? LOLAssuming Slavin and Pesce continue their growth, and knowing we're bringing in Hamilton to create an excellent defensive core for at least the next 3 seasons, I think we could end up being one of those franchises that makes a goalie look a lot better than he might actually be, based on the play in front of him. You know about the struggles of a team like Philly and Winnipeg over the long haul because their defense routinely hung their goalie out to dry, and with a subpar player in net, things went to ****. Its no coincidence the second that Philly shored up its D (at least for a brief time) with Pronger, they were able to ride Michael Leighton to Game 6 OT of the Stanley Cup Finals.
I think that's the angle we're taking right now. Can't fix the goalie overnight, well then time to make everything in front of him such a nightmare to get through that all you need is a goalie who can make the routine save.
Ned showed some solid improvement in the AHL last year, but was still pretty inconsistent...he was either >.920 or <.900, little in between. IMO, if there's ANY chance of him making the NHL in the future, you let him continue to develop in the AHL vs bringing him up to the NHL before he's ready and potentially destroying his confidenceThis is not the year to be in search for a starting goalie. All that's out there are 1B types, at best. I'm becoming increasingly convinced that there's only one potential solution in net for this franchise next season: Nedeljkovic. On an optimistic note, I think he's the perfect stylistic fit if the defensive system is similar. I'd like to see him given a real look this time around if the goalies falter.
Keep the future books clean-ish and re-sign Ward for 1 year. He's the one solid goalie I can see doing that with this franchise.
Put Darling on a short leash and I mean short. If he's sub-.900 in mid-October, swap him out with Nedeljkovic.
Ward
Darling/Nedeljkovic
Nedeljkovic/Booth/Helvig
Darling/Booth/Helvig
Booth/Helvig
ECHL Back-up