Kyle Chipchura said:
Why not wait before making such assumptions? He has yet to dominate for his junior team, and hasn't played in a U-20 tournament yet. He did have a great rookie tournament in Ottawa and a very impressive pre-season for Montreal - playing against AHL level players for the most part - so let's not get ahead of ourselves on his case. At the moment, 7.5 seems about right, but I agree about the "D" though. I'm pretty sure about one thing: the type of game that Latendresse likes to play will fit very well in the NHL. More than in Q in fact IMO.
7,5 means means he wont be a legit 1st liner -- at least not on a regular basis.
D means that he could drop to 4,5, which is a career minor leaguer.
I would have no problem with this rating if it would be constant. Considering A. Kos evaluation, it means.
-Not matter how A.Kos develops, he'll always be better than a Guillaume Latendresse who had developped as expected. Since he's unlikely to do so (hence, the D), it means chances A.KOS becomes a better player than Latendresse are about 99/100 - NHL-wise.