Has another month and a half changed anyones mind on any of these players?
weakest draft class in recent years...said this a already a year ago...watch ou for '15 and '16!!!
Weird, because I think this draft class is stronger than last year's.
I don't consider any of them close to NHL ready. Not one player. They all should be returned to junior.
Completely agree.
A little patience early can really go a long way in the development of prospects. Continue to put them in situations where they can succeed, build confidence, physically/mentally mature, and refine their games. Inserting them into the NHL and throwing them to the wolves before they are truly ready can have quite negative results.
I think 2013 had a better top 5, but 6-35 is quite similar, it's after 35 where 2013 sets itself apart from 2014.You know, I kinda feel that way myself. The high end this year maybe isn't as strong as the high end from last year, but I feel like you're more likely to nab an impact player well into the 2nd or 3rd round this year than you were last year. Someone like Josh Ho-Sang being a late 1st or early 2nd is crazy to me when you look at his tools, but then there aren't a lot of guys ahead of him who you'd want to bump to make room for him, either. A guy like Connor Bleackley who could go anywhere from 15th to mid-2nd might turn out to be Todd Harvey at the NHL, but he also might just develop right and turn into Mike Richards. Or a guy like Joe Hicketts. Or Aaron Haydon. Or one of Matt Mistele or Blake Clarke rebounding from terrible draft years.
As far as the OP goes, though, I figure Ekblad (physically and mentally ready) and Reinhart (too smart to go back) are in the NHL next year, as well as Virtanen (He is on a roll, I'm predicting he goes Top 10, maybe higher) and Ritchie (At his size, another year of junior probably isn't necessary and he can cut his teeth as an energy line guy as he develops). Maybe Haydn Fleury.
Burkie's team is being lead in scoring by a 19 year old. Sean Monahan. I think if he got Ekblad, he'd have him in the NHL. None of the others though. They aren't ready.Unfortunately #1 picks are not returned to junior (ready or not) and if the #1 pick this year ends up being Ekblad, then it increases the chances of stunting his development. (especially if he ends up in either Edmonton or Buffalo). If Calgary gets him, then I have faith that there is a greater chance Burke will do the right thing and send him back to junior. Personally I'm not a Burkie guy...but when it comes to player development we agree more often than not.
I think 2013 had a better top 5, but 6-35 is quite similar, it's after 35 where 2013 sets itself apart from 2014.
Last year we had guys like Nic Baptiste and such who fell to the 3rd round. I don't see 2014 being as deep. But it's solid in the first 2 rounds.
What really separates the Klimchuk's, McCarron's, Poirier's, and Gauthiers from the Fabbri, Ho-Sang, Bleackley's, Larkin's, Tuch's and Milano's?
I'd say not that much if anything the 2014 guys look to have more upside
Burkie's team is being lead in scoring by a 19 year old. Sean Monahan. I think if he got Ekblad, he'd have him in the NHL. None of the others though. They aren't ready.
a forward is one thing...plus he's 19 years old. 18 year freshly drafted d-man is another matter entirely.
Is Ritchie fat or built? If he's that heavy from muscle then going to the NHL would be better for his game as he no longer needs time to fill out. If it's fat then I would send him back to lose some of that.