More pts this season: Marchand, Stamkos, Marner, or P Kane

[Leafidelity]

We should probably wait until Marner puts up 70 before we start comparing him to some of the best offensive producers of this generation , who are now also in their prime.

This post is all kinds of funny when you realize Marner put up 69 points last year.

He's gonna be so disappointed when he finds out he missed the cut by a single point

 

[b in vancouver]

I think Marchand will challenge for the Art Ross this year if he plays a full season.

 

[thunder16]

2 of those players were in the top 10 and 3 of them have been in the top 10

One of them has never reached 70 points

Marner should have the least amount t of votes if you're a rational person

Wow he missed 70 by a whole point. He could of had 90 if Bozak plus others would have scored those open net tap ins Marner gave them. Oh well maybe he can get that 1 point to hit 70 playing with Tavares to satisfy you!

 

[Critical13]

2 of those players were in the top 10 and 3 of them have been in the top 10

One of them has never reached 70 points

Marner should have the least amount t of votes if you're a rational person

Do you make all your decisions based on what happened yesterday?

 

[dukeofjive]

This is marchand to lose, unless he misses a lot of games this year.

 

[Soliloquy of a Dogge]

Easily marner, he’s playing with Tavares lol.

He could of had 90 if Bozak plus others would have scored those open net tap ins Marner gave them.

Quickly becoming one of the most overrated players on these boards.

 

[thunder16]

Quickly becoming one of the most overrated players on these boards.

Quickly becoming one of the best players in the League, I can tell you don't watch him!

 

[ER89]

We should probably wait until Marner puts up 70 before we start comparing him to some of the best offensive producers of this generation , who are now also in their prime.

Pretty stupid post as he had 69 pts instead of the magical 70. And I certainly hope you don't have a career in finance if you look at the past for future valuation.

 

[alg363636]

If Marchand plays 82 it will be him pretty easily

Huge if though

Otherwise I'm gonna go with Stammer

 

[Drytoast]

We should probably wait until Marner puts up 70 before we start comparing him to some of the best offensive producers of this generation , who are now also in their prime.

So in otherwords, your bold predictions only happen once its already happened.

Good to know!

 

[Cotton]

Quickly becoming one of the most overrated players on these boards.

He's put on muscle and is even quicker, he looks fantastic.

I voted Stamkos, but Marner is a legit answer, and if anything he's underrated - not in what he's done, but on what he could do.

 

[Spirit of 67]

OMG children if you don't like the poll rules, don't take part.

Start your own where you can compare whomever you like.

 

[Harhis]

Quickly becoming one of the most overrated players on these boards.

No different from other Leaf players. Year ago we were told Marner is going to hit 90, didn't. Same story now. One year he might and then you will be hearing a lot of "told you".

 

[Incognito]

We should probably wait until Marner puts up 70 before we start comparing him to some of the best offensive producers of this generation , who are now also in their prime.

So if Marner had scored 1 more point last season, then this comparison would be valid? I've never understood these artificial plateaus that people create (e.g. a 70 point player. Is there really any appreciable difference between a player who score 69 points and one who scores 70?). That being said, I do agree that Marner has more to prove before he's placed into this elite category. He has an excellent opportunity to get there though, starting this season. We'll see how it all unfolds.

 

[WetcoastOrca]

So if Marner had scored 1 more point last season, then this comparison would be valid? I've never understood these artificial plateaus that people create (e.g. a 70 point player. Is there really any appreciable difference between a player who score 69 points and one who scores 70?). That being said, I do agree that Marner has more to prove before he's placed into this elite category. He has an excellent opportunity to get there though, starting this season. We'll see how it all unfolds.

Ok call him a 70 point player if it makes you feel better.

 

[kk87]

I think Kane bounces back to high 80s/low 90s

 

[Incognito]

Ok call him a 70 point player if it makes you feel better.

Way to miss the point completely.

 

[Zegs2sendhelp]

Marchand
Stamkos
Kane
Marner

but I could see them all being within 5 points of each other.

 

[WetcoastOrca]

Way to miss the point completely.

What? Your post was hung up on the artificial barrier of saying he hadn’t yet hit 70 points. I agreed.
The main point though is that he hasn’t come close to the point levels of any of the other guys yet.

 

[Sasso09]

Marchand (88)
Kane (85)
Stamkos (80)
Marner (75)

This Is my order as well but my numbers would be

Marchand (90)
Kane (82)
Stamkos (80)
Marner (73)

 

[CanadienShark]

I think Kane has a big year. No reason, just a hunch.

 

[Incognito]

What? Your post was hung up on the artificial barrier of saying he hadn’t yet hit 70 points. I agreed.
The main point though is that he hasn’t come close to the point levels of any of the other guys yet.

Okay, sorry, my bad. I misunderstood, and I agree he hasn't come close to the level of the other players in this poll yet.

Anyways, the way I see this going is:

Marchand (91)
Kane (87)
Stamkos (85)
Marner (78)

 

[ER89]

No different from other Leaf players. Year ago we were told Marner is going to hit 90, didn't. Same story now. One year he might and then you will be hearing a lot of "told you".[/QUOTE

Who told you? The voices in your head don't count!

 

[Peggy]

Wow he missed 70 by a whole point. He could of had 90 if Bozak plus others would have scored those open net tap ins Marner gave them. Oh well maybe he can get that 1 point to hit 70 playing with Tavares to satisfy you!

He COULD of IF

Ifs and buts
Still never hit 70 and that's a fact not my opinion or projections

 

[Peggy]

Do you make all your decisions based on what happened yesterday?

When you burn your hand in a fire, do you put your hand back in the fire?