SlickM32
Registered User
I made an earlier thread comparing average rank of each team since 2005-06 which was met with some criticism as rankings could be very tightly packed or spread out, so the ranking overall means little in the grand scheme of things. I redid my numbers based on PP opportunities, PP opportunities versus the average, and percent difference from the average. I did not use things such as standard deviations, medians, etc. which you can if you want (I attached the excel I made).
The raw numbers again have less justification than %'s because even if you are say 10 PP below the average, if the average is 500 PP, then 10 is a minor difference, whereas if the average is a 100 PP, well the 10 is a major difference.
Since this is an 8 season spread, there has been a lot of roster turnover, so it is a large enough sample size to expect the average % difference from the PP average to be around 0%, but since 8 seasons leaves enough error, I am willing to say +/- 3% to be fair. The raw number is harder to judge.
Here is % above average (Example: Carolina, over the past 8 seasons, has on average had 12% more powerplays than the league average)
CAR 12%
PIT 8%
LAK 6%
DET 5%
VAN 5%
MTL 4%
SJS 3%
PHI 3%
DAL 3%
CBJ 2%
TOR 2%
PHX 1%
BUF 1%
TBL 1%
EDM 0%
NYR 0%
CGY 0%
WPG -1%
STL -1%
WSH -1%
OTT -3%
CHI -3%
ANA -3%
MIN -3%
NSH -4%
NYI -5%
NJD -7%
COL -7%
FLA -8%
BOS -10%
Here is the raw number difference from the average. (Example: Over the past 8 seasons, Carolina has on average had 39 more powerplays than the league average). As you can see, the rankings shift slightly, but similar overall.
CAR 39
PIT 25
LAK 21
VAN 17
DET 12
SJS 11
DAL 10
TOR 7
CBJ 7
PHX 6
MTL 6
PHI 5
BUF 3
WPG 2
EDM 0
TBL 0
CGY -1
NYR -1
STL -2
WSH -4
NSH -7
ANA -7
OTT -8
MIN -11
CHI -11
NYI -18
COL -20
NJD -26
FLA -28
BOS -29
Again, you could go more in depth, but this is just a snapshot. This doesn't take into account how many times a team went on a PK, and that really has little to do with amount of penalties drawn. It does not make sense, over a long period of time (sans some small variations, which I said +/- 3%) for a team to somehow draw many more penalties. Even a team has more star power, it should not cause a drastically higher amount of PP's. Maybe 1-2%, and even that is a stretch.
People will say NJ or Bos is a defensive team, so they don't draw many PP, but Min was trap city for a good portion of this timeframe and they are only -3% below average. BOS was a top scoring team one of these years and still managed to be in the bottom frame. So point is, I'm not sure the defensive argument necessarily holds true.
The raw numbers again have less justification than %'s because even if you are say 10 PP below the average, if the average is 500 PP, then 10 is a minor difference, whereas if the average is a 100 PP, well the 10 is a major difference.
Since this is an 8 season spread, there has been a lot of roster turnover, so it is a large enough sample size to expect the average % difference from the PP average to be around 0%, but since 8 seasons leaves enough error, I am willing to say +/- 3% to be fair. The raw number is harder to judge.
Here is % above average (Example: Carolina, over the past 8 seasons, has on average had 12% more powerplays than the league average)
CAR 12%
PIT 8%
LAK 6%
DET 5%
VAN 5%
MTL 4%
SJS 3%
PHI 3%
DAL 3%
CBJ 2%
TOR 2%
PHX 1%
BUF 1%
TBL 1%
EDM 0%
NYR 0%
CGY 0%
WPG -1%
STL -1%
WSH -1%
OTT -3%
CHI -3%
ANA -3%
MIN -3%
NSH -4%
NYI -5%
NJD -7%
COL -7%
FLA -8%
BOS -10%
Here is the raw number difference from the average. (Example: Over the past 8 seasons, Carolina has on average had 39 more powerplays than the league average). As you can see, the rankings shift slightly, but similar overall.
CAR 39
PIT 25
LAK 21
VAN 17
DET 12
SJS 11
DAL 10
TOR 7
CBJ 7
PHX 6
MTL 6
PHI 5
BUF 3
WPG 2
EDM 0
TBL 0
CGY -1
NYR -1
STL -2
WSH -4
NSH -7
ANA -7
OTT -8
MIN -11
CHI -11
NYI -18
COL -20
NJD -26
FLA -28
BOS -29
Again, you could go more in depth, but this is just a snapshot. This doesn't take into account how many times a team went on a PK, and that really has little to do with amount of penalties drawn. It does not make sense, over a long period of time (sans some small variations, which I said +/- 3%) for a team to somehow draw many more penalties. Even a team has more star power, it should not cause a drastically higher amount of PP's. Maybe 1-2%, and even that is a stretch.
People will say NJ or Bos is a defensive team, so they don't draw many PP, but Min was trap city for a good portion of this timeframe and they are only -3% below average. BOS was a top scoring team one of these years and still managed to be in the bottom frame. So point is, I'm not sure the defensive argument necessarily holds true.