I don't understand why we start lawson tonight when Tokarski is a better prospect...
I don't understand why we start lawson tonight when Tokarski is a better prospect...
We stole Lawson from the Sens?
Looks like our lineup is set for game 1
Patches-DD-Briere
Bourque-Plek-Gio
Gally-Eller-Gally
Moen-White-Prust
Gorges-Diaz
Markov-Daiz
Tinordi-Bouillon
Parros is very unlikely to be ready so I think Bournival starts the year as the 13th forward until Parros is ready which won't be long after the start of the year.
And with Murray also not likely to start the year, Tinordi is going to actually play. But I wonder if the Habs will actually keep an extra dmen like Pateryn to start until Murray is healthy.
I don't understand why we start lawson tonight when Tokarski is a better prospect...
We're doomed... We lost Subban to a clone of Diaz
Diaz-Daiz would make a killer combo
Diaz-Daiz would make a killer combo
We're doomed... We lost Subban to a clone of Diaz
Thanks for putting a name on that mysterious invisible teammate
Didn't know we unretired H. Richard's jersey. That's something that HAS to stop.
Strange line up for tonight What's the minimum number of NHLers required? It seems we only have our 3rd and parts of our 4th line. And the D is Diaz and a bunch of prospects?
Wouldn't it be the time where we actually fine tune the details by letting the regular play at least 2 or 3 games?
I don't think that lineup is confirmed, but it's 8. Eller, Moen, St-Pierre, Tarnasky, Blunden, Diaz, Budaj and Price would bring us to the minimum.
By HFHabs 2013 standards big starts at 6'5 - 235lbs though
The definition of NHLer is one that has played only 1 game at the NHL level, I assume?
100 NHL games, 25+ years old, or a 1st round draft pick from the current year. If memory serves.
Ah, that 25+ year old thing threw me. I was wondering how a few of those guys could be considered 'NHLers' without there being some weirdness to it. Thanks.