Michel Beauchamp
Canadiens' fan since 1958
Haha, wow, so fitting. Ofcourse they bring in the guy who is known for favouring the Habs. With Bettman in attendance and all, hahaha.
Wow...
Just look at the Canadiens' record with Lee as a ref...
Haha, wow, so fitting. Ofcourse they bring in the guy who is known for favouring the Habs. With Bettman in attendance and all, hahaha.
Good for them. Going down 3-0 is a difficult hill to climb. They should blame themselves for getting into this situation.
And having 1 debatable goal in an elimination game is usually not enough to win. Good effort though.
What's your point? I didn't say it should be reviewed, I said the refs took away a goal, which they did. The fact that it supposedly happens all the time doesn't change that.
Looked better than it was. Turris didn't get full wood on it nor did he elevate like he should have. Price actually missed it and it hit his stick knocking it from his hand, fairly lucky actually.
There's something you're failing to understand.
We all know what happened because we've watched it over and over.
The ref didn't even see a puck lying loose next to Price- so the least he could do is go to the war room to have them confirm what happened.
The result would have been the same. Just because the VAN clip shows an instance where the official's ruling was overturned- and how that applies- it's still reviewable.
1.Stone almost has his arm chopped off - no suspension
2.High stick leads to a goal 30 seconds later
3.Ref blows call on Pageau goal
Rough series for Ottawa fans.
By the rules, so long as it's part of a continuous play, and the whistle didn't affect the outcome of the goal crossing the line.
I would argue that Pageau's net drive after a shot is definitely part of a continuous play. Whether the whistle caused the players to let up could be an issue, but Pageau did have his man beat, and the other d was tangled up with another player.
All I'm saying is it was worth taking a look at, and the league did itself a great disservice by not doing so.
...yes, it does...quick whistles happen...no one can say whether Petry slowed up after the whistle, giving Pageau the lane...or that Price didn't ease up after the whistle...all that is clear is that it was an early whistle...
No because it was obvious that without pageau that puck is NOT going in the net....
Get it?
1.Stone almost has his arm chopped off - no suspension
2.High stick leads to a goal 30 seconds later
3.Ref blows call on Pageau goal
Rough series for Ottawa fans.
...yes, it does...quick whistles happen...no one can say whether Petry slowed up after the whistle, giving Pageau the lane...or that Price didn't ease up after the whistle...all that is clear is that it was an early whistle...
I don't know if Price will be enough to get past Detroit/Tampa. The Habs weren't overly impressive to me
I know you're being sarcastic, but between the armed attack on Parliament Hill, our GM being diagnosed with terminal cancer, and our assistant coach actually dying of terminal cancer, it really hasn't been the easiest year to endure in Ottawa.
Dominated games 1,2,3 for sure.
I was simply correcting you because you were wrong.
Don't know much about the countinous play. If you shoot the puck after the whistle, you do not score. Period.
If you want to go down the list of infractions the referees missed, it's going to be a very long one.
I don't know if Price will be enough to get past Detroit/Tampa. The Habs weren't overly impressive to me
No because it was obvious that without pageau that puck is NOT going in the net....
Get it?
The fact remained that the Habs advanced and the Sens is eliminated.