Yeah that's still not a +ppg player, 69 in 78 at the end of the day.
that's why I said "feels like", he's been that for long enough that I think he'll continue it, and I'll project him as that going forward. Really the size of a season is an arbitrary way to dissect what sample size should be used as a predictor of future performance, that just happens to be the number of games that an NHL season is, it's not the number of games that gets to reliably suggest that a player can continue a level of performance
also have to consider:
- how sustainable the sh% & OIsh% are, maybe a player has just gotten really lucky with an unsustainable proportion of pucks on net going in when he's on the ice - Marner's numbers are sustainable ( both shooting %'s lower than Aho's over the same period)
- linemates & opportunity - Marner's been dynamite since getting reasonable linemates & opportunity, has spent time with some really poor players in very limited minutes this season. Averages more than a minute and a half less icetime per game than Aho, and 30 seconds less PP time per game than Aho
anyway, if you want to look at boxscore stats and make grand proclamations about what a player is, be my guest. Current Mitch Marner is a ppg+ star, I'll bet that he can continue at this level of production