Mitch Marner Vs. Kapanen, Connor Brown, Kadri

Who would you rather have


  • Total voters
    267

KapG

Registered User
Dec 2, 2008
10,630
1,771
Toronto
Easily Marner. That doesn’t mean I wouldn’t trade him tho. I think he needs to go. Not for that tho
 

Yackiberg8

Registered User
Mar 11, 2016
2,777
1,666
Halifax
Connor Brown 56GP 21G 14A 35P
Kasperi Kapanen 40GP 11G 19A 30P
Nazem Kadri 56GP 11G 21A 32P

I take a full 2nd line any day of the week over a winger. They all are on good contracts too.
Third line*. If that’s your second line you have problems.

Poll should be Marner, Kerfoot, Mikheyev and it’s Marners group by a landslide.
 

Xspyrit

DJ Dorion
Jun 29, 2008
30,827
9,764
Montreal, Canada
Third line*. If that’s your second line you have problems.

Poll should be Marner, Kerfoot, Mikheyev and it’s Marners group by a landslide.

This was their pace this year :

Connor Brown (31 goals, 51 pts) - Nazem Kadri (16 goals, 47 pts) - Kasperi Kapanen (23 goals, 61 pts)

I mean, it's not Maple Leafs dynasty level but those are absolutely 2nd line numbers (or more), particularly if you consider that Kadri could provide more in a more offensive role.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sparxx87

Yackiberg8

Registered User
Mar 11, 2016
2,777
1,666
Halifax
This was their pace this year :

Connor Brown (31 goals, 51 pts) - Nazem Kadri (16 goals, 47 pts) - Kasperi Kapanen (23 goals, 61 pts)

I mean, it's not Maple Leafs dynasty level but those are absolutely 2nd line numbers (or more), particularly if you consider that Kadri could provide more in a more offensive role.
I don’t think you’re making the playoffs if that’s your second line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ciao

Xspyrit

DJ Dorion
Jun 29, 2008
30,827
9,764
Montreal, Canada
I don’t think you’re making the playoffs if that’s your second line.

Those players wouldn't be the whole second line and Marner is not playing on the 2nd line so we're comparing apples and oranges anyway. My personal point was that if your replace Marner, Thornton and Simmonds by these 3, you probably make the playoffs and have a better chance to actually win a round. That being said, I don't know how that 1st line would work but they'd find plenty of ways to score IMO. Maybe not as much as with Marner but it's a more balanced forward group IMO.

Hyman-Matthews-Kapanen
Brown-Tavares-Nylander
Kerfoot-Kadri-Mikheyev
Galchenyuk-Spezza-Engvall
 
  • Like
Reactions: sparxx87

Ducks in a row

Go Ducks Quack Quack
Dec 17, 2013
18,006
4,363
U.S.A.
If you already have elite talent but lacking in depth you take the depth like this. If you have depth but no elite talent you take elite talent. Taking elite talent all the time no matter what doesn't work in cap era.
 

Aashir Mallik

Registered User
Apr 19, 2019
11,438
11,656
Kadri is a 2C/2W
Kapanen is a 2-3W
Brown is a 2-3W

I’ll take that over Marner

If we went into the playoffs with this as a forward core Instead:

Brown - Matthews - Kadri
Kapanen - Tavares - Nylander
Hyman - Kerfoot - Mikheyev
Simmonds - Engvall - Spezza

we would’ve had a better chance, better depth and our top line would have 3 scoring threats, instead of .5 against the habs who knows, who cares. Back to sulking
 

trentmccleary

Registered User
Mar 2, 2002
22,227
1,101
Alfie-Ville
Visit site
I don’t think you’re making the playoffs if that’s your second line.

If all of the offensive talent in the league had been spread out equally between all 31 teams, these would have been the PPG stats for the 16th (average) offense (min. 50% GP):

RankPPGTorPlayer
161.061.27Matthews
470.861.22Marner
780.720.89Tavares
1090.610.82Nylander
1400.550.77Hyman
1710.470.56Spezza
2020.420.45Thornton
2330.380.41Kerfoot
2640.330.41Foligno
2950.290.31Mikeyev
3260.250.29Engvall
3570.200.24Simmonds
[TBODY] [/TBODY]

1090.610.75Kapanen
1400.550.63C.Brown
1710.470.57Kadri
[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Kapanen - Kadri - C. Brown would have been an above average offensive, 2nd line. They could have been the 2nd line for a playoff team.
 

Holymakinaw

Registered User
May 22, 2007
8,637
4,512
Toronto
Are they really elite talent if they are completely invisible during the playoffs?

Marner is paid like an elite talent, I'm not so sure he actually is elite though.

LOL. Yes, they are still elite talent if they finish 4th in league scoring. They might need a therapist to get through the post season, but they are DEFINITELY still elite in the talent dept.
 

Pyrophorus

Registered User
Jun 1, 2009
26,197
2,905
Eastern GTA
Kadri is a 2C/2W
Kapanen is a 2-3W
Brown is a 2-3W

I’ll take that over Marner

If we went into the playoffs with this as a forward core Instead:

Brown - Matthews - Kadri
Kapanen - Tavares - Nylander
Hyman - Kerfoot - Mikheyev
Simmonds - Engvall - Spezza

we would’ve had a better chance, better depth and our top line would have 3 scoring threats, instead of .5 against the habs who knows, who cares. Back to sulking

How do you know? Maybe the mental block affects them too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aashir Mallik

SotasicA

Registered User
Aug 25, 2014
8,489
6,404
Since it's three against one, I think the real gist of the poll is which line would win if they went head-to-head:

Mitch Marner + two fringe NHLers playing with league minimum salaries

or

Brown - Kadri - Kapanen

The second unit is actually cheaper, by $1.65m
 
  • Like
Reactions: sparxx87

Pyrophorus

Registered User
Jun 1, 2009
26,197
2,905
Eastern GTA
Since it's three against one, I think the real gist of the poll is which line would win if they went head-to-head:

Mitch Marner + two fringe NHLers playing with league minimum salaries

or

Brown - Kadri - Kapanen

The second unit is actually cheaper, by $1.65m

The first line is better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mats13

SotasicA

Registered User
Aug 25, 2014
8,489
6,404
The first line is better.
Maybe.

I'll use capfriendly with 775k comparables and an RNG to generate a line.

Ross Colton - Brian Pinho - Mitch Marner
(Colton is actually a good one. Pinho I have no idea who he is).

Kasperi Kapanen - Nazem Kadri - Connor Brown
 
  • Like
Reactions: sparxx87

Erik Alfredsson

Beast Mode Cowboy!
Jan 14, 2012
13,050
5,053
LOL. Yes, they are still elite talent if they finish 4th in league scoring. They might need a therapist to get through the post season, but they are DEFINITELY still elite in the talent dept.
You're not elite if you can be shut down to 0 goals in 18 playoff games like Marner. One season where he finished in the top 4 in points (in a weird season where teams only played within their division) is not enough to call him elite.
 

Holymakinaw

Registered User
May 22, 2007
8,637
4,512
Toronto
You're not elite if you can be shut down to 0 goals in 18 playoff games like Marner. One season where he finished in the top 4 in points (in a weird season where teams only played within their division) is not enough to call him elite.

LMAO.

Uh, Marner had a 94 point season a few years ago, followed by "pacing" for another 93 point season, and then pacing for 101 points this year. He is VERY elite. He's one of the league's best RW's.
 

TLEH

Pronounced T-Lay
Feb 28, 2015
19,514
14,855
Bomoseen, Vermont
Not understanding the notion that you win with elite talent in the NHL. You win with a large conglomeration of good players and a few elite ones. Not 4 elite ones and then a bunch of bozos. Toronto's problem is they don't have enough good players and they never will because they paid the elite ones too much.

Boston and Colorado and Tampa are probably the three best teams left and their elite players make nothing compared to Torontos players and that is why. Not because Marner isn't good enough. Its because other teams can key in on the elite players a lot easier because the rest of the lineup isn't good enough.


The whole is way more important than a player or two.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xspyrit and Sting

Erik Alfredsson

Beast Mode Cowboy!
Jan 14, 2012
13,050
5,053
LMAO.

Uh, Marner had a 94 point season a few years ago, followed by "pacing" for another 93 point season, and then pacing for 101 points this year. He is VERY elite. He's one of the league's best RW's.
Nope, sorry. Show up when it matters. He's good at racking up points in the regular season, is a liability when the going gets tough. Not elite.
 

Volica

Papa Shango
May 15, 2012
21,430
11,105
How is this close?

If the salaries were 3-4M apart, I could understand going with less salary. However, it's 100k difference. You win in the NHL with elite talent, not a combination of 2nd line/middle six forwards.

You win with elite talent and depth.
It’s insane people watch this sport and still can’t figure that out.

If I’ve got Matthews and Tavares already on my team, along with Nylander, I’m taking option B all day for a playoff run.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->