prototypical4thliner
Registered User
- Jan 12, 2017
- 3,989
- 5,971
Honestly it’s labor intensive but you would have to run the data for WAR for that year then individually analyze each player to prognosticate. Or develop some sort of algorithm to predict.Theres no way to predict it so I am guessing they are using status quo which is why its heavily flawed and ultimately worthless.
Look at the difference between Calgary in 17-18 and then 18-19 after a coaching change and a few tweaks. Outhouse to Penthouse (though they did **** the bed in the playoffs).
Either way not easy. I can see why we are as low as we are.
Next question is what moves WAR and how far? Because you have to think provorov and ghost return to a level closer to 17-18, Patrick improves, sanheim and Myers provide a better performance than hagg, Macdonald and gudas. Also, Hart is the real deal.