Betamax*
Guest
Interesting piece by my favourite ex-hockey blogger turned MSM, James Mirtle on the upcoming Olympics Break and how it affects players and teams.
Mirtle: How the Olympic break works for NHL players
JAMES MIRTLE
The Globe and Mail
Published Tuesday, Jan. 28 2014, 3:37 PM EST
Last updated Tuesday, Jan. 28 2014, 8:08 PM EST
Source: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/spor...-break-works-for-nhl-players/article16548337/
I will excerpts a few points of the article that may be relevant for the Canucks:
re:
Any ELC player will be send down before the break i.e. Lain and Corrado will be ... Would Kassian require the "loophole" as stated above? To be honest, I'm not exactly clear on what being "eligible" means. I assume that means a player would have to clear waivers since they've played more than the number of pro games that would invoke waivers eligibility and this "loophole" will mean they don't need to clear waivers. Someone please confirm or deny this.
And ....
I think the Canucks' may do this with David Booth (since there's virtually no risk of losing him on waivers and they would be doing a happy dance, IMO, if a team were to make a claim) and save some cap space, even if it's just a little bit.
The article also talks about "no conditioning assignments allowed until Feb. 19", so I don't think the Canucks can send Lack down there for some playing time (he is on a standard players' contract) is my inference.
Mirtle: How the Olympic break works for NHL players
JAMES MIRTLE
The Globe and Mail
Published Tuesday, Jan. 28 2014, 3:37 PM EST
Last updated Tuesday, Jan. 28 2014, 8:08 PM EST
Source: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/spor...-break-works-for-nhl-players/article16548337/
I will excerpts a few points of the article that may be relevant for the Canucks:
re:
Here’s a rundown of some of the more interesting aspects of the break:
- The trade freeze runs from 3 p.m. ET on Friday, Feb. 7, until 11:59 p.m. on Sunday, Feb. 23, the day of the gold medal game in Sochi.
- As Elliotte Friedman pointed out earlier in the day, players are paid throughout the break, so there could be some cap-related manoeuvrings prior to the freeze. One NHL executive noted that one bizarre loophole with the break is some entry level players can be “loaned†(i.e. demoted to the minors) for cap reasons even if they aren’t eligible to play in the AHL, making it merely a paper transaction. (NHL deputy commissioner Bill Daly said that was a simplified way of looking at what’s possible during the break but “not categorically inaccurate.â€)
- Why can’t some players play in the AHL? Well the league and the NHLPA negotiated a big, long list of stipulations over which players get an Olympic break and which ones don’t, a string of legalese that’s not included in the CBA. Basically, players who don’t require waivers to be sent down still get the time off if (a) they were on an NHL roster (or injured reserve) for at least 75 per cent of the days between Oct. 1 and Jan. 24, including being in the NHL on Jan. 24 or later or (b) they participated in 16 of the last 20 games before the break.
- Regardless of their age or contract status, players who fall into those two groups are deemed to have earned an Olympic break and can’t “practice, participate or play†with their AHL team at any point during the 10-day break.
Any ELC player will be send down before the break i.e. Lain and Corrado will be ... Would Kassian require the "loophole" as stated above? To be honest, I'm not exactly clear on what being "eligible" means. I assume that means a player would have to clear waivers since they've played more than the number of pro games that would invoke waivers eligibility and this "loophole" will mean they don't need to clear waivers. Someone please confirm or deny this.
And ....
- If you want to put a veteran player on waivers, however, in order to play them in the minors during the break, that’s fair game. That’s a pretty cold move if it’s a player that’s been on your roster all season and planning for some time off, but it would save some cap space.
I think the Canucks' may do this with David Booth (since there's virtually no risk of losing him on waivers and they would be doing a happy dance, IMO, if a team were to make a claim) and save some cap space, even if it's just a little bit.
The article also talks about "no conditioning assignments allowed until Feb. 19", so I don't think the Canucks can send Lack down there for some playing time (he is on a standard players' contract) is my inference.