Bounces R Way
Registered User
He left his feet after contact,
Not what I see. Jumps into it to make what would of been a high hit already even higher. His feet are in the air when contact is made.
He left his feet after contact,
@Bounces R Way I slowed the video down to 1/4 speed. I won't upload it for copyright concerns but you all can do this at home.You're using loaded words that really don't have a ton of meaning. He left his feet after contact, which is simply the result of an elastic collision where the guy being hit has a lower centre of mass than the guy hitting. Dumba's arms were tucked going into contact, and an outward push is completely natural and instinctive when making a hit, because the resistive force from the person being hit pushes back against you. Follow-throughs are inevitable because of the nature of the physics in a hit. To better conceptualize this, think about what you would do if you were going to run into a wall. Now think about what your arms would do if the wall gave way.
Those two features you're talking about are both inevitable, and constants in hits that have this geometry. I don't fault you one bit for being mad about it given an important player got hurt and it could have been avoided, but I think you're misdirecting your rage in a bit of a witch hunt, and you're really reaching.
Right here is where I think your main misunderstanding with the rule lies here. The hitter's responsibility is to make a hit through the centre of the body. This is representative of the defensive motivation behind the body-check in the first place. By checking through the centre of the puck-carrier, you maximize the chance of accomplishing the goal of the check. It is also the fairest expectation, as it is easiest for a hitter to target the centre of mass when compared to targeting or avoiding specific parts of the body. In addition, while the head is often located in the centre of the body, a check delivered through the centre of the body avoids catching a weaker body part such as an arm or a knee with enough torque to break a bone or ligament. So believe it or not, there is a safety element there. It also precludes players from avoiding the centre of the body specifically to target an injury.@Bounces R Way I slowed the video down to 1/4 speed. I won't upload it for copyright concerns but you all can do this at home.
.....
- 2.5 Seconds before Dumba corrects his line to ensure he is lined up with Backlunds head.
Dumba had the opportunity to hit Backs on his right side dealing a glancing blow but chose to go to Backlund's left to mete out the most damage.
Right here is where I think your main misunderstanding with the rule lies here. The hitter's responsibility is to make a hit through the centre of the body. This is representative of the defensive motivation behind the body-check in the first place. By checking through the centre of the puck-carrier, you maximize the chance of accomplishing the goal of the check. It is also the fairest expectation, as it is easiest for a hitter to target the centre of mass when compared to targeting or avoiding specific parts of the body. In addition, while the head is often located in the centre of the body, a check delivered through the centre of the body avoids catching a weaker body part such as an arm or a knee with enough torque to break a bone or ligament. So believe it or not, there is a safety element there. It also precludes players from avoiding the centre of the body specifically to target an injury.
What I see is that Dumba recognized that Backlund could possibly cut to his right, but not to his left, so he approached from the right side (Backlund's left). He aimed his hit for the centre of Backlund's body, which is where Backlund's head was. The fact that he corrected his line to ensure he was lined up with Backlund's head is the same fact that he corrected his line to ensure he was lined up with Backlund's body. Backlund's attempt to mitigate impact was to lean back slightly to his right, which slightly changed how this all lined up on impact.
The last point you make there, that Backlund could have made a "glancing blow," is not one that the NHL would consider important. Hitting through the centre of the body is always allowed (assuming other rules aren't believe violated such as elbowing or interference). There is never an expectation for a player to reduce the defensive impact of his hit in order to protect the opposition player on an open-ice hit.
Peters didn't even suggest it was an illegal hit, and I think there's pretty much zero chance that supplemental discipline gets applied here. I am trying to let you down gently here.
The turning of the skate and coiling of the knee shows Dumba's intention. He launched himself into the hit with the principal point of contact being the head.
As a reference Sundqvist was a scoring position and not in the defensive zone. Almost the identical hit.
This is very simple, keep the topline together. Shift Bennett over to C and move Neal up to the 2nd line. Done.
Also I don’t think Dumba’s hit was really dirty, however he does need to be responsible for his body. I won’t be surprised at all if he gets suspended.
I was going to say that Peluso and Lomberg in the lineup at the same time makes this team horrendously worse, but Lomberg is probably getting suspended so yeah maybe.If backlunds out, peluso will prob play against the oil
It was just a dumb (not illegal) hit.
I also think lomberg is not big enough to handle the Neanderthals in EdmontonI was going to say that Peluso and Lomberg in the lineup at the same time makes this team horrendously worse, but Lomberg is probably getting suspended so yeah maybe.
Lindholm as the 2C makes the most sense on paper, but I loathe to split up that top line. It's been so good.
I hear you. But does it hurt as bad if he gels with Tkachuk and it gets Neal going a little at the same time?
Plus it's Peters. He's gonna blend.