LightningStrikes
Champa Bay Lightning
- Nov 24, 2009
- 26,148
- 9,934
2 goals and 5 points in his last 5 games. Sitting out a few games in between seems to have done him good.
I get why you'd say that, but I honestly see him aging more like Stralman rather than a Hal Gill. He has good mobility, protects himself fairly well, but has had issues with missing a few games a year. Maybe taking the time to heal isn't the worst thing, though.It’s an interesting question. McDonagh has had a great season but that contract is still worrisome long term, we’re going to be tight against the cap in the near term with all the players we have to resign over the next couple of years, and the right side of our defense is likely going to be quite inexperienced in the near future. Theoretically we could trade McDonagh and get good value in return, resign Stralman or possibly acquire another top four RHD making ~$4.5-5M (maybe in a package for McDonagh?), and save a little cap space in the process. Then we balance out the veteran leadership between the sides rather than concentrate it all on the same side, and open the doors to a potential future top pairing of Sergachev-Foote. The downsides to this idea are that McDonagh has been playing very well this season, Stralman is slowly declining but at any moment may fall off the cliff entirely, and we’d have improved our short and longterm cap outlooks at the expense of having added a short to medium term staffing liability. In the end it’s a tough call that ultimately comes down to how much longer you think McDonagh can continue to play at his current level.
Key point of this article for me
"With a robust lead in the east"
This is where Cooper should start purchasing development time with some of our points. Give Sergachev 20 minutes every game while resting vets. When rosters expand, get Katchouk into the lineup until the AHL playoffs.
Create a culture that this organization wins from top to bottom no matter where you rank
f*** no. Go away.Thoughts on this trade:
TO PHI
- Sergachev
- Cirelli
- 1st
TO TAM
- Simmonds
- Gostisbehere
Wouldn't give up Sergachev and Cirelli is a beastThoughts on this trade:
TO PHI
- Sergachev
- Cirelli
- 1st
TO TAM
- Simmonds
- Gostisbehere
Not sure about giving Katchouk/Raddysh etc time just yet, if we don't need them in, because I wouldn't want to needlessly get them closer to waiver eligibility.
I actually thought he looked pretty good.Serg didn't look too great against Toronto IMO.
I actually thought he looked pretty good.
So this play he's been getting some crap on (sadly the video doesn't show the first puck battle that Tampa walked away with and couldn't clear).
Go to 36 seconds in the video. Stralman with 2 Leafs below the hash marks. Sergachev has Kadri marked but is also guarding the front of the net (exactly where he's supposed to be). Johnson is slow in supporting Stralman, but he *should* be covering the passing lane between Marleau and Kapanen there. If you look at the freeze frame, we have everyone marked. 5 blue shirts in the frame with 4 white shirts. Stralman isn't in the greatest position but he's been left on an island against two forecheckers.
If Johnson is going to go support Stralman, he a) needs to do it earlier, and b) either Point or Kucherov needs to cycle in and cover his assignment. A shot from the point (especially if it's Kucherov's guy Hainsey) isn't that concerning, especially since it will generally be unscreened and also everyone else is marked so as long as you don't fall asleep you don't have to worry about passes/tips/screens.
But Johnson is slow to support, and no one covers his assignment in time (Kucherov is a bit late in getting there). So Marleau passes it to Kapanen who's wide open in the slot. Kadri is Sergachev's "guy", but he's essentially in a mini-2 on 1 situation here, but he tries to block the passing/shooting lane. The only mistake here is not getting down to block the lane quite fast enough, but this is a play that's developing quickly. Kadri is unchecked and can scoop it up.
Sergachev's big "mistake" is not clogging the lane fast enough, but he was in a position he never should have had to be in. I really can't fault him too much for how that play developed.
I actually thought he looked pretty good.
So this play he's been getting some crap on (sadly the video doesn't show the first puck battle that Tampa walked away with and couldn't clear).
Go to 36 seconds in the video. Stralman with 2 Leafs below the hash marks. Sergachev has Kadri marked but is also guarding the front of the net (exactly where he's supposed to be). Johnson is slow in supporting Stralman, but he *should* be covering the passing lane between Marleau and Kapanen there. If you look at the freeze frame, we have everyone marked. 5 blue shirts in the frame with 4 white shirts. Stralman isn't in the greatest position but he's been left on an island against two forecheckers.
If Johnson is going to go support Stralman, he a) needs to do it earlier, and b) either Point or Kucherov needs to cycle in and cover his assignment. A shot from the point (especially if it's Kucherov's guy Hainsey) isn't that concerning, especially since it will generally be unscreened and also everyone else is marked so as long as you don't fall asleep you don't have to worry about passes/tips/screens.
But Johnson is slow to support, and no one covers his assignment in time (Kucherov is a bit late in getting there). So Marleau passes it to Kapanen who's wide open in the slot. Kadri is Sergachev's "guy", but he's essentially in a mini-2 on 1 situation here, but he tries to block the passing/shooting lane. The only mistake here is not getting down to block the lane quite fast enough, but this is a play that's developing quickly. Kadri is unchecked and can scoop it up.
Sergachev's big "mistake" is not clogging the lane fast enough, but he was in a position he never should have had to be in. I really can't fault him too much for how that play developed.
That effects their waiver eligibility once rosters expand?
Thoughts on this trade:
TO PHI
- Sergachev
- Cirelli
- 1st
TO TAM
- Simmonds
- Gostisbehere
yea we dont need 2 more PP specialistsWe wouldn’t trade Sergachev alone for that garbage, much less add to him.
heres my trade ideaThoughts on this trade:
TO PHI
- Sergachev
- Cirelli
- 1st
TO TAM
- Simmonds
- Gostisbehere