Speculation: Mike Babcock fired by the Leafs, should we take him back?

Should we take Babcock back?

  • Yes - fire Blashill and bring Babcock back at this season, if Babcock gets fired

    Votes: 33 11.7%
  • Yes - keep Blashill for rest of the contract and bring Babcock back later, starting at 2021

    Votes: 14 4.9%
  • No - keep Blashill for rest of the contract, and make coaching change at 2021

    Votes: 118 41.7%
  • No - fire Blashill and bring in some other coach.

    Votes: 118 41.7%

  • Total voters
    283
  • Poll closed .

TheClap

Registered User
Jul 20, 2014
424
328
Which is just silly. You're trying to fit things into a narrative and therefore you're ignoring for example how much Tatar improved under Babcock. I'd argue that Babcock got more out of Brendan Smith and Jakub Kindl than anyone else.
Those with memories know that Jurco got lots of chances to be a scoring line player but it never worked out. That's another guy that has never been as good as he was under Babcock. The idea that a coach can ruin someone's development is completely ridiculous, there are countless examples of players that were mishandled by coaches and went on to fulfill their potential for other coaches. Guys don't forget talent because they're used on a 4th line or on the PK instead of the top 6 and PP.

Tbh I don't really give a whole lot of credit to coaches overall for "developing" players, but I do think coaches can push players in the right directions that make them better players or fulfill their talent, but it's not gonna make the difference between a Kindl and a Hedman. The fact that there's almost no player we can look at that did poorly under Babcock and say "look, he went elsewhere and did much better" is a strong indication that Babcock does get the most out of players, both offensively minded players and grinders.

Tatar. Hudler. Kyle Quincey. Kopecky. Best seasons all away from Babcock.

Babs was in Detroit for 9 years, so there isn't a huge sample size of guys that got a chance elsewhere, especially during an era when the Wings liked to rarely give a prospect a chance until their RFA rights were exhausted.

Inverse though, who are the guys that struggled elsewhere but excelled under Babcock? Dan Cleary defintely. Drew Miller sure. Sammy had his career jumpstarted but his best seasons were in Vancouver after he left Detroit.

There may be a longer list of guys who were successful elsewhere and struggled under Babcock. Kyle Quincey: The Return, Stephen Weiss, Jordan Tootoo, David Legwand, Tyson Barrie and the rest of the 2019-2020 Toronto Maple Leafs.

Time will tell. We'll see what happens with Marner, Matthews, Nylander and the other young Leafs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: avssuc

TheClap

Registered User
Jul 20, 2014
424
328
Quite funny those Dumas summer moves.

- "does great with strong 2-way players." - Dubas trades his best defensive/matchup center Kadri away. Season ago left Bozak walk (wins Cup at St. Louis)
- "squeezes the most out of defensive forwards. - Dubas trades also Connor Brown to Ottawa, who is now 1st minute logger there.
- "has done poorly with young defencemen. - Dubas did get rid of veteran defemen, and next options on line are just Marlies prospects.

So Dubas has built the exactly opposite direction, which have been Babcock's bread and butter.

Guy didn't give a **** about his coaches wishes.

Yep. Can't have a coach and a GM that have such conflicting directions for the team and expect to be successful.

Dubas will be feeling the hotseat himself soon enough if Keefe can't right the ship.
 

Pavels Dog

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
19,857
14,936
Sweden
Tatar. Hudler. Kyle Quincey. Kopecky. Best seasons all away from Babcock.

Babs was in Detroit for 9 years, so there isn't a huge sample size of guys that got a chance elsewhere, especially during an era when the Wings liked to rarely give a prospect a chance until their RFA rights were exhausted.

Inverse though, who are the guys that struggled elsewhere but excelled under Babcock? Dan Cleary defintely. Drew Miller sure. Sammy had his career jumpstarted but his best seasons were in Vancouver after he left Detroit.

There may be a longer list of guys who were successful elsewhere and struggled under Babcock. Kyle Quincey: The Return, Stephen Weiss, Jordan Tootoo, David Legwand, Tyson Barrie and the rest of the 2019-2020 Toronto Maple Leafs.

Time will tell. We'll see what happens with Marner, Matthews, Nylander and the other young Leafs.
Tatar's 29 goal season is his best imo, but regardless I really don't think him or other skill players were mishandled by Babcock. If we're talking about young players being developed, if you want to give coaches ANY credit for it, you have to give Babcock credit for Nyquist, Hudler, Franzen, Datsyuk, Zetterberg, Filppula, Tatar and maybe more. Not just bottom 6 grinders. You can't selectively pick and choose which players you think the coach deserves credit for developing. As if any skilled guy that becomes good was just destined to become good, but the coach ruins other skilled guy that don't become as good.

Now you bring a bunch of veterans into the mix which muddles the discussion. Circling back to Toronto, Matthews & Marner have put up amazing numbers, Rielly's developed into an all-star (after not developing so much in the years prior to Babcock arriving), and Nylander was having a very strong season. If anything it was the bottom 6 grinders, the stay-at-home defense, the grit and physicality that was missing for that team. Skill and offense was not.
 

14ari13

Registered User
Oct 19, 2006
14,118
1,219
Norway
Howard sucked in his second season. He dropped from .924 and 2.26 to .908 and 2.79.
He rebounded for two more very good years.
Unfortunately, Holland agreed to that six-year contract in the second of those back-to-back very good years.
And then as soon as the contract started, Howard regressed.
Howard's injuries might have more to do with him being out of shape. The last few years I've seen a lot of pictures of him where he looks the designated hitter for the 1982 Brewers.

Howard was asked to do too much. Firstly in regular season and then playoffs.
He never recovered after the loss to sharks.
 
Last edited:

ricky0034

Registered User
Jun 8, 2010
15,009
7,194
Which is just silly. You're trying to fit things into a narrative and therefore you're ignoring for example how much Tatar improved under Babcock. I'd argue that Babcock got more out of Brendan Smith and Jakub Kindl than anyone else.
Those with memories know that Jurco got lots of chances to be a scoring line player but it never worked out. That's another guy that has never been as good as he was under Babcock. The idea that a coach can ruin someone's development is completely ridiculous, there are countless examples of players that were mishandled by coaches and went on to fulfill their potential for other coaches. Guys don't forget talent because they're used on a 4th line or on the PK instead of the top 6 and PP.

Tbh I don't really give a whole lot of credit to coaches overall for "developing" players, but I do think coaches can push players in the right directions that make them better players or fulfill their talent, but it's not gonna make the difference between a Kindl and a Hedman. The fact that there's almost no player we can look at that did poorly under Babcock and say "look, he went elsewhere and did much better" is a strong indication that Babcock does get the most out of players, both offensively minded players and grinders.

how many of those examples played under said coach for 200+ games though?

Babcock had a LOT of time with Smith and Kindl,it's impossible to really tell for sure what ultimate effect he had on them but the idea that a coach can have a positive impact on a player long term in a year or two but somehow can't have a negative one even if they play for him for half a decade is what's really "completely ridiculous" here
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheClap

The Zetterberg Era

Ball Hockey Sucks
Nov 8, 2011
40,977
11,606
Ft. Myers, FL
Looking forward to the “McCarty’s a snowflake millennial” posts.

So this is another person that references abuse of just regular JLA staff. You could be the guy that changes the garbage and if you didn't do it right...

Yet another guy who played for Bowman and Babcock, but with only negative things to say about Babcock.

Because Bowman was just as bad. Right.

No, I don't think all people are equating them, just more Bowman did some pretty reprehensible things in his own right. I really doubt a bunch of people are going to talk on it above what they have, but he used to bully guys pretty good, he generally got his targets moved out of town though.

Keep in mind through 2009 Bowman and Babcock talked daily when Scotty was in his consulting role. That was really his biggest role once he moved back to Buffalo was the constant communication with Babcock. I think Babcock is a Bowman want to be that couldn't pull it off in the same manner and what went from bad attempts, became spectacularly bad attempts once he couldn't clear some of his ideas or take Scotty's ideas on tough love and apply them. It is why it has gotten progressively worse and more dug in. But that is my opinion. I have heard plenty of stories on Bowman that aren't great either, but ultimately he had a much better feel for the line on most of his players and the people around him. I mean think of how often Ken Daniels tells the story of Bowman MFering him in the lobby and not talking to him for 6 or so weeks because he was unhappy with something he said. Was it crazy different than Babcock on Strickland, probably not only Bowman and Daniels did eventually talk and he did a much better job of re-establishing the relationship. Babcock seemed to want to establish dominance and keep it. Bowman wanted to establish dominance, but ultimately I think he wanted you to see he was working towards something. Babcock missed out on that part of his teachings in my opinion and just focused in on the endless mind games and preparation habits Bowman was known for, but Scotty figured out how to get to other levels beyond and if he was going to give up on you he just got you traded instead of keeping you for whipping boy purposes.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Air Budd Dwyer

TheClap

Registered User
Jul 20, 2014
424
328
So this is another person that references abuse of just regular JLA staff. You could be the guy that changes the garbage and if you didn't do it right...



No, I don't think all people are equating them, just more Bowman did some pretty reprehensible things in his own right. I really doubt a bunch of people are going to talk on it above what they have, but he used to bully guys pretty good, he generally got his targets moved out of town though.

Keep in mind through 2009 Bowman and Babcock talked daily when Scotty was in his consulting role. That was really his biggest role once he moved back to Buffalo was the constant communication with Babcock. I think Babcock is a Bowman want to be that couldn't pull it off in the same manner and what went from bad attempts, became spectacularly bad attempts once he couldn't clear some of his ideas or take Scotty's ideas on tough love and apply them. It is why it has gotten progressively worse and more dug in. But that is my opinion. I have heard plenty of stories on Bowman that aren't great either, but ultimately he had a much better feel for the line on most of his players and the people around him. I mean think of how often Ken Daniels tells the story of Bowman MFering him in the lobby and not talking to him for 6 or so weeks because he was unhappy with something he said. Was it crazy different than Babcock on Strickland, probably not only he and Daniels did eventually talk and he did a much better job of re-establishing the relationship. Babcock seemed to want to establish dominance and keep it. Bowman wanted to establish dominance, but ultimately I think he wanted you to see he was working towards something. Babcock missed out on that part of his teachings in my opinion and just focused in on the endless mind games and preparation habits Bowman was known for, but Scotty figured out how to get to other levels beyond and if he was going to give up on you he just got you traded instead of keeping you for whipping boy purposes.

There are people absolutely equating the two, normalizing Babcock's prickish behavior because "Bowman was a jerk too." They're missing the key difference that you've so eloquently just explained.

I 100% agree with your assessment of the differences in Bowman's and Babcock's tactics, and that is precisely why Bowman is almost universally praised, and the other is getting universally lambasted.
 

MBH

Players Play
Jul 20, 2019
13,497
7,298
SE Michigan
redwingsnow.com
Key thing:
“That’s the key. In spite of him, right? In spite of him. And I learned that more getting into ’09 because we won in ’08 in spite of him and lost in ’09 because of him. That’s exactly the thing because he misused (Pavel) Datsyuk, (Henrik) Zetterberg and just because he’s stubborn and that was his way.”

In a thousand years, I'll never understand why
Holmstrom-Datsyuk-Zetterberg
Franzen-Flip-Hossa
wasn't good enough
 
  • Like
Reactions: Air Budd Dwyer

Dotter

THE ATHLETIC IS GARBAGE
Jul 2, 2014
8,511
2,962
Imprisonment, TN
goo.gl
Looking forward to the “McCarty’s a snowflake millennial” posts.

I didn't click open the article. And I know your post is directed towards me. But what cost the Detroit Red Wings the cup in 2009 was the Pittsburgh Penguins, who were the better team when it mattered most.

I think it's cowardly to not accept that Pittsburgh was the better team and they fully deserved the Stanley Cup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lazlo Hollyfeld

Lazlo Hollyfeld

The jersey ad still sucks
Mar 4, 2004
28,454
26,838
I didn't click open the article. And I know your post is directed towards me. But what cost the Detroit Red Wings the cup in 2009 was the Pittsburgh Penguins, who were the better team when it mattered most.

I think it's cowardly to not accept that Pittsburgh was the better team and they fully deserved the Stanley Cup.
That's what's so stupid about all of this. Now that the lynch mob has started Babcock is getting blamed for everything Wings fans were ever disappointed about.

Not winning the cup in 09. Any prospect who didn't turn into a good NHL player. That Datsyuk and Zetterberg didn't magically continue their peak point production into their late 30s.

It muddies the actual issue of what is acceptable behavior for a coach now and bringing a culture change into hockey. To a man (minus Commodore) all the players being referenced still admit that Babcock was a good coach. Babcock is not unique in coaching for being stubborn. That's not the issue. The issue is a code of conduct and professionalism and what is acceptable and what is not.
 

Retire91

Stevey Y you our Guy
May 31, 2010
6,162
1,580
I just kinda have 3 takeaways. He is not as good a coach as people thought he was, but he is also not a bad coach. And he is a jerk to his players more so than typical coaches. And that some organizations will overlook his jerkness because they want/need a good coach.

I don't think his personality sheds much light on anything that happened differently, it doesn't explain anything. It is just eye opening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lazlo Hollyfeld

ManwithNoIdentity

Registered User
Jun 4, 2016
6,937
4,311
Kalamazoo, MI
That's what's so stupid about all of this. Now that the lynch mob has started Babcock is getting blamed for everything Wings fans were ever disappointed about.

Not winning the cup in 09. Any prospect who didn't turn into a good NHL player. That Datsyuk and Zetterberg didn't magically continue their peak point production into their late 30s.

It muddies the actual issue of what is acceptable behavior for a coach now and bringing a culture change into hockey. To a man (minus Commodore) all the players being referenced still admit that Babcock was a good coach. Babcock is not unique in coaching for being stubborn. That's not the issue. The issue is a code of conduct and professionalism and what is acceptable and what is not.


Well he does have a hand in a lot of that but it really is ridiculous all these people coming out and kicking him while he’s down
 

Dotter

THE ATHLETIC IS GARBAGE
Jul 2, 2014
8,511
2,962
Imprisonment, TN
goo.gl
I just kinda have 3 takeaways. He is not as good a coach as people thought he was, but he is also not a bad coach. And he is a jerk to his players more so than typical coaches. And that some organizations will overlook his jerkness because they want/need a good coach.

I don't think his personality sheds much light on anything that happened differently, it doesn't explain anything. It is just eye opening.

This is fair.
 

2xJack

Registered User
Apr 19, 2019
203
117
I didn't click open the article. And I know your post is directed towards me. But what cost the Detroit Red Wings the cup in 2009 was the Pittsburgh Penguins, who were the better team when it mattered most.

I think it's cowardly to not accept that Pittsburgh was the better team and they fully deserved the Stanley Cup.

So, the teams meet in 2008 and the Wings win, and then we add Hossa. Yet in 2009 the Penguins are better? Right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheClap

2xJack

Registered User
Apr 19, 2019
203
117
The Babcock defenders need to give up now. The dam has broken. I expect the stories to continue rolling in, it seems there is more than enough material to air. This has gone far beyond just looking bad for him.

Regarding the Babcock vs Bowman comparisons, I think a very key difference that many are missing is that while Bowman did play mind games with his players, he was a master of beating the opposition mentally. Anyone remember Crawford's meltdown? Scotty's classic "I knew your father before you did" line? Bowman never took his eye off winning. He knew who he needed on his side and only pushed people over the line when they were on the other team. Basically, anything he did to play with the minds of his own players was child's play compared to what he did to opponents. Babcock, on the other hand, is more like the Bobby Knight of the NHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: odin1981

ManwithNoIdentity

Registered User
Jun 4, 2016
6,937
4,311
Kalamazoo, MI
The Babcock defenders need to give up now. The dam has broken. I expect the stories to continue rolling in, it seems there is more than enough material to air. This has gone far beyond just looking bad for him.

Regarding the Babcock vs Bowman comparisons, I think a very key difference that many are missing is that while Bowman did play mind games with his players, he was a master of beating the opposition mentally. Anyone remember Crawford's meltdown? Scotty's classic "I knew your father before you did" line? Bowman never took his eye off winning. He knew who he needed on his side and only pushed people over the line when they were on the other team. Basically, anything he did to play with the minds of his own players was child's play compared to what he did to opponents. Babcock, on the other hand, is more like the Bobby Knight of the NHL.

I really don’t see anyone rushing to defend Babcock
 

Ricelund

̶W̶e̶ ̶l̶i̶k̶e̶ ̶o̶u̶r̶ ̶t̶e̶a̶m̶
Apr 16, 2006
8,714
4,619
New York, NY
I didn't click open the article. And I know your post is directed towards me. But what cost the Detroit Red Wings the cup in 2009 was the Pittsburgh Penguins, who were the better team when it mattered most.

I think it's cowardly to not accept that Pittsburgh was the better team and they fully deserved the Stanley Cup.
Not directed at you in particular and you’re missing the point.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad