Player Discussion Mika Zibanejad

ecemleafs

Registered User
Jan 4, 2009
19,575
4,675
New York
I really don't see a problem with it since it clearly didn't impact his offense and despite having no 4th line, he still only played 21:38 per game so its not leading to overuse....totally agree that hopefully as the bottom 6 improves he won't have to do it as much. but mika isn't elite cause he scored alot, he is elite cause he can play in all situations so I love what he is doing on the defensive side of the puck
ive said it before, but take away his SH TOI and give him for 5 on 5 time and were better and we protect our star player by not having him get into shooting lanes.
 

Edge

Kris King's Ghost
Mar 1, 2002
34,749
42,578
Amish Paradise
Mika is an elite 1C... the rest of the league hasn’t caught on yet. Another year and they’ll begrudgingly agree. Two years from now they’ll be some revisionist history going on and the same posters who were claiming he wasn’t top 20, was a fluke, etc. will be claiming it was obvious Mika was elite in 2019. Don’t believe me? Bookmark some choice posts. We acquired Mika at the perfect moment and for some reason - personal maturation, combined with a change of scenery, etc. - Zibanejad grew into his absolute full potential in NY. This will go down as one of the best acquisitions in the team’s history.

The challenge Zibanejad has is that he doesn't pass the quick stats glance for people who casually follow the Rangers.

If he plays all 82 games this season, and maintains his scoring pace, he posts 59 goals and 108 points. Then people would stop, take a closer look, and then learn even more abouut him beyond the numbers.

But whether people want to admit it or not, they tend to scroll through stat sheets and scoring leaders, and so to lazy eyes he only looks like a 57 point player. You'd think that sounds overly simplistic, but I've seen it for years in the industry.

But a healthy Mika is the real deal. I think most GMs and players know that. Commentators, obeservers, fans, and reporters? Probably more of a mixed bag.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leetch3 and LokiDog

Sockosensei

Registered User
May 13, 2007
505
347
Japan
But whether people want to admit it or not, they tend to scroll through stat sheets and scoring leaders, and so to lazy eyes [Zibanejad] only looks like a 57 point player. You'd think that sounds overly simplistic, but I've seen it for years in the industry.
I think there's truth to this.

If they're looking at enough stats, though, they should notice this one:naughty:

League leader in
Goals Per Game
Mika Zibanejad NYR (0.72)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leetch3

McSauer

Defense Wins Games
Feb 18, 2004
811
299
Jersey City, NJ
He...looked like shit for most of that game yesterday.

2 points, great. Doesn't change the fact that he was useless most of this game and didn't bring one ounce of intensity or the great skating ability we saw all year.

He was in great company yesterday, as Panarin, CK, Strome and more were all invisible. All of them should take a look in the mirror before game 2, or else we'll be out of the bubble by Wednesday morning...
 
  • Like
Reactions: KirkAlbuquerque

Mikos87

Registered User
Mar 19, 2002
9,064
3,244
Visit site
If I can choose between a 120 point player who only brings offense or a 80 point player who also plays defense, I will pick the latter every time.

I have nothing against Draisaitl, Kucherov etc, but I would pick Barkov or a prime Bergeron/Kopitar ahead of them every time. And this past season, Zibanejad is in that same conversation

The numbers bear it out too. He is in that league of center. More Anze and Barkov imo.
 

True Blue

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
30,092
8,362
Visit site
He...looked like shit for most of that game yesterday.

2 points, great. Doesn't change the fact that he was useless most of this game and didn't bring one ounce of intensity or the great skating ability we saw all year.

He was in great company yesterday, as Panarin, CK, Strome and more were all invisible. All of them should take a look in the mirror before game 2, or else we'll be out of the bubble by Wednesday morning...
The whole team looked bad. But given a 5 month layoff, I do not think that this series is a barometer by which to judge.
 

EdJovanovski

#RempeForCalder
Apr 26, 2016
28,745
56,747
The Rempire State
Probably the most disappointing player on our team in the playoffs. I hope he was playing injured or something, he looked very sluggish, uncoordinated, and was not playing with much intensity. If he was slacking off during the pause and came in out of shape I’m not sure I see a future captain here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McSauer

True Blue

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
30,092
8,362
Visit site
Probably the most disappointing player on our team in the playoffs. I hope he was playing injured or something, he looked very sluggish, uncoordinated, and was not playing with much intensity. If he was slacking off during the pause and came in out of shape I’m not sure I see a future captain here.
If only he and Trouba could be packaged in one deal for multiple draft picks......
 

Star Ocean

Registered User
Dec 30, 2018
3,583
2,003
Probably the most disappointing player on our team in the playoffs. I hope he was playing injured or something, he looked very sluggish, uncoordinated, and was not playing with much intensity. If he was slacking off during the pause and came in out of shape I’m not sure I see a future captain here.
Panarin was worse and costing 10m. I know you hate all swedish players but still.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR

Rangers394

Registered User
Aug 5, 2020
902
845
Even though he didn't do much against Carolina, it's nice to actually have the 1st line center spot filled. That's one thing we can knock off the list
 

mrhockey193195

Registered User
Nov 14, 2006
6,522
2,014
Denver, CO
Did Carolina not have a 5 month layoff?
I mean, yes, but the point is that we shouldn't judge a team based on how they perform is unprecedented and truly bizarre circumstances. It's like if the lights went off in the arena and it was pitch black, but they decided to still play and one team won the game, we wouldn't say "well, both teams had to deal with it, so..."
 
  • Like
Reactions: haveandare

SnowblindNYR

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Nov 16, 2011
52,006
30,555
Brooklyn, NY
I mean, yes, but the point is that we shouldn't judge a team based on how they perform is unprecedented and truly bizarre circumstances. It's like if the lights went off in the arena and it was pitch black, but they decided to still play and one team won the game, we wouldn't say "well, both teams had to deal with it, so..."

I don't know about that. They were still playing hockey. Plus, when you hire people at a normal job you hope that they can deal with adversity and ambiguity well. Why shouldn't we hold our superstars to that standard and in particular our HC?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ColonialsHockey10

mrhockey193195

Registered User
Nov 14, 2006
6,522
2,014
Denver, CO
I don't know about that. They were still playing hockey. Plus, when you hire people at a normal job you hope that they can deal with adversity and ambiguity well. Why shouldn't we hold our superstars to that standard and in particular our HC?

Fair points. I just have a hard time judging a player if they were not in peak condition or didn't spend the layoff skating during a pandemic. I anticipate many (ideally all) of them had their health and the health of their family as their top priority.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR

haveandare

Registered User
Jul 2, 2009
18,923
7,453
New York
I don't know about that. They were still playing hockey. Plus, when you hire people at a normal job you hope that they can deal with adversity and ambiguity well. Why shouldn't we hold our superstars to that standard and in particular our HC?
This isn’t the only time they’ve ever experienced and reacted to adversity. Overall they overachieved this year and met adversity along the way.

The point is it’s probably not wise to put too much weight into results in a circumstance that has never occurred before and very well may never occur again. It counts for something but it shouldn’t be the basis for decisions imo.
 

broadwayblue

Registered User
Mar 4, 2004
20,056
1,822
NYC
Zibanejad was filthy this year. Are we really killing him for 3 bad games in a post-season in which we had no real shot of making any noise? Sounds about right.

Maybe we can get Brassard back...he's playoff proven. ;)
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad