Mid 1st round pick: 2004 or 2005?

Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by nyrcup94, Oct 4, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. nyrcup94

    nyrcup94 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    228
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Winston-Salem, NC
    Home Page:
    I was wondering about the depth of the 2004 draft versus 2005. Would you rather have a 1st round pick in the 12-16 range in 2004 or in 2005? It seems that most label the 2004 draft as weak in comparison to the 2005 draft. Any and all opinions are appreciated.
     
  2. X-SHARKIE

    X-SHARKIE Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    9,362
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Janesville Wisconsin
    Home Page:
    I would take a 2005 draft pick in that area without much question at all. I think the 2005 draft class well be one of the best in quite some time. I think the North American class might actually be better than 2003's...and on top of that, the European class also appears very strong.

    Although 2004 isn't really all that bad of a draft and I think it gets more bad rep then it deserves...It was an average draft and picks from the 12-16 range should become quite good players.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"