gstommylee
Registered User
- Jan 31, 2012
- 14,477
- 2,782
The Maloofs have been going under for a while now. So yes, their business acumen at this point is in question.
And if the league doesn't have the right to approve owners, why would they have a vote on it? They don't have the right to force a sale but they have the right to prevent one.
And you're wrong about the figure. Look at ESPN's article on this...
And what I was referring to with Schultz was that he was the guy that the original ownership sold it to to try and get a new arena deal. He didn't do it, obviously. But prior to Schultz, that ownership was trying as well and didn't do it. That was their chance and the attempt to sell it to Schultz was another chance but he failed miserably. The Maloofs are the owners prior to Schultz in this scenario.
They're not forcing an owner to sell. They're preventing a sale for whatever reason. If they don't like an owner for whatever reason, it is within their right to not give him one of their franchises. If they don't, you should probably tell them then that their BoG vote is useless because I'm sure it would be news to them.
They only reject a sale if there is money problems with the buyer. Ultimately its what the maloofs want to do. If they want to sell to Seattle's group, the NBA can't tell them no and that you can only sell to local group is my point. That is exactly what kevin Johnson wants the NBA to do. Reject Seattle's sale and essentially accept the local group offer.
Think about it if NBA says no and Maloofs decide to not sell it to local group, the NBA is still stuck with the maloofs.
Oh there is a 30m guaranteed no-refund down payment that hansen is paying to maloofs and there could be legal ramifications with that if there is any attempt to block the sale.
Last edited: