McDavid in the dot?

Oddbob

Registered User
Jan 21, 2016
15,937
10,483
Who gives a rip if he lost all 100% of his faceoffs, if he puts up 90+ points a season he can lose every faceoff ever and what does it matter? Face-offs are overrated anyways, as most teams average close to 50% anyhow, so it is all pretty even, and lots of lost faceoffs ended up being good for the losing team and vice versa.
 

Brobust

Registered User
Sep 29, 2017
6,869
6,300
Huh? Draisaitl from the same draft (turned 22 late Oct) has the same FO% as WN.

Give McJesus another year to develop.

Well, my response was to a guy saying Matthews was great at face-offs. I was just letting him know that Nylander was better. Nothing to do with McDavid or Draisaitl.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Future GOAT

TomasHertlsRooster

Don’t say eye test when you mean points
May 14, 2012
33,360
25,417
Fremont, CA
Matthews was 46% in the dot the year he stepped into the NHL. Hardly elite.

Remember, Auston Matthews is an elite faceoff man, and he is significantly better than Connor McDavid defensively, and is a significantly better possession player, despite all of the statistics that point to the contrary. If you just say it enough it will eventually become the consensus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Future GOAT

ponder

Registered User
Jul 11, 2007
16,968
6,304
Vancouver
He's terrible at faceoffs, but he's still the best player in the league. He'll very likely improve with time, most guys start out pretty poor at faceoffs, with his elite smarts and dedication, plus pretty good strength, you have to imagine he has the ability to get good at them.

Of course, there are some guys who never improve on the dot - Malkin comes to mind. Although, it didn't stop him from being a regular top 2-3 player in the league, just as it won't stop McDavid from being the top player of his generation, even if he does happen to stay weak on draws.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad