- Oct 9, 2012
- 27,882
- 23,868
Steve Yzerman also put up a ton of points in his younger years. Then he learned about this thing called defense that helps win championships.
You tell me to grow up after posting just that ? Remarkable.
Which is being an anti-fan. To each their own, however, I would not be happy if a team that should have won gets stiffed, even if I disliked the franchise. Perhaps mildly amused at a from of schatenfroid, btw, what team do you cheer for?
He deserves every bit of the praise he is getting.
What he has not earned yet is comparaison with a guy like Crosby.
You can score more points, you can have more trophies, you can be "better", but until your actually have team success (the reason why they play the games), well... what does it really mean? That you are stuck in a bad situation, mostly. But it also raises unfair questions about you as a player.
Only raises questions by people who are dumb. Haha
Anyone that can't separate team succes from individual success is clearly lacking in critical thinking ability.
McDavid is 24. By age 24 Crosby had been to two Cup finals, winning one.
It might be dumb, but it happens... and you drop in all-time rankings when you have never won. As good/productive as you may have been.
It might be unfair, but it is what it is.
Not on any all time rankings that matter. If that is the kind of thinking someone uses to build their all time list, that just lets us know which all time lists to ignore. haha
Raymond Bourque for example was a great player whether he managed to win a cup at age 40 or not.
Thank you so much! That's impressive, I totally didn't expect McDavid to have a slight edge even in this.McDavid's first 371 games:
174 goals
506 points
At least 1 point in 277 games
Crosby's first 371 games:
183 goals
506 points
At least 1 point in 273 games
McDavid is 24. By age 24 Crosby had been to two Cup finals, winning one.
I am bit sick of this McDavid love fest every day.
I was forced to open this topic, just to say this,
He definitely was, but him winning with the Avs in 2001 greatly influence the narrative around his career.
I mean, you can disagree that it should have an impact, but reality is that it DOES have an impact.
So after his latest 5 point dominant performance Connor McDavid is up to 7 games with 5 points or more. That's one more than Sidney Crosby who has just managed to score 5 points or more 6 times during his career. It's pretty amazing that McDavid has been able to have more dominant big 5 point games than Crosby despite playing only 37,1 % or the games Crosby has played. McDavid is also doing it on a much worse team than Crosby. Sure McDavid has his bargain bin poor mans version of Malkin in Draisaitl, but besides that he's only been playing with mostly jobbers and washed up has been. McDavid hasn't even had anyone close to as good as Cris Kunitz. It's only a matter of time before McDavid starts separating himself from Crosby and piling up his resume to become the 5th best player of all time.
I'm not sure why you're so skeptical, this happens more often than not. The majority of coaches aren't going to wear out their best players for no reason and risk injury. Opposing teams often start headhunting or at least playing more recklessly so you'd be crazy not to bench your stars.Really? Who are those superstars?
McDavid played 3 mins in the 3rd and didn't play much in the last 10 mins of the 2nd
And that would have elevated him to the same category of epic as Sam Gagner!The last 5 points game McDavid had should have an asterisk. Tippett sat him out most of the 3rd period
With the way he was playing, that could have been a 8 point night
McDavid's first 371 games:
174 goals
506 points
At least 1 point in 277 games
Crosby's first 371 games:
183 goals
506 points
At least 1 point in 273 games
McDavid has had 4 games this year where he didn't score a point including one against the Senators. How is this possible?