Proposal: Max Pacioretty for RNH+(+?)

Riptide

Registered User
Dec 29, 2011
38,887
6,520
Yukon
I am already calling my shot that when the oilers move Nuge--the trade will be viewed as the oilers gave him away and that is what will happen

Almost certainly. On the other hand if they get an even half decent return for him, HF will be crucifying the other GM for "overpaying".
 

Spearmint Rhino

Registered User
Sep 17, 2013
8,887
8,585
Habs need a C who can drive offence, especially if they are moving Pacs who creates majority of his goals by himself. RNH is not that guy. Looking around the league there's not really a 1:1 fit, either Montreal needs to involve a 3rd team to get pieces that work or keep Pacs and try and package something else together for a veteran C on a rebuilding team
 

Seedling

Tier 7 fan (ballcap)
Jul 16, 2009
6,226
30
Canada
RNH + slepyshev ??

Dream on. You can keep "Captain" Pacciorety. That's a huge overpay for him too. Slepy will probably get 20 this year and RNH isn't an issue here. This trade would just make us overpay to become worse as a team. Just terrible.:shakehead
 

ChaoticOrange

Registered User
Jun 29, 2008
50,553
29,191
Edmonton
Guess it's a good thing fans don't negotiate for the GM. The team doesn't care what the fans think about deals from either side.

Of course not, but you'd think after the five thousandth Plekanec + spare part + meh pick offer gets shot down in flames people would get more creative.

Edmonton is better off waiting until next offseason. Centres that can play top 6 are always in demand and RNH will only be 25 this time next year. We'll get better offers than what's being offered here.
 

Captain Controversy

Registered User
Apr 30, 2015
4,447
2,818
Alberta
Nuge will put up sixty to seventy points this year. Yes some will Come from playing with Mcdavid. His value will Increase and the oilers will get a good player for him.
 

Never

Can you hear me now?
Sep 16, 2009
12,771
83
Calgary
Nuge will put up sixty to seventy points this year. Yes some will Come from playing with Mcdavid. His value will Increase and the oilers will get a good player for him.

Saying RNH will put up 60-70 pts is somewhat bold given his career high is 56. Also, why would he be playing with McDavid?
 

Riptide

Registered User
Dec 29, 2011
38,887
6,520
Yukon
Of course not, but you'd think after the five thousandth Plekanec + spare part + meh pick offer gets shot down in flames people would get more creative.

Edmonton is better off waiting until next offseason. Centres that can play top 6 are always in demand and RNH will only be 25 this time next year. We'll get better offers than what's being offered here.

And he'll still have 3 years on his contract (which is a good thing for his trade value).
 

Spearmint Rhino

Registered User
Sep 17, 2013
8,887
8,585
Nuge will put up sixty to seventy points this year. Yes some will Come from playing with Mcdavid. His value will Increase and the oilers will get a good player for him.

Well if we are allowed to hallucinate Pacs will pot fitty and put up 80 pts and get us Toews in return

Drug induced hypotheticals and 'Pace' arguments should be banned from HF
 

Benstheman

Registered User
Nov 20, 2014
6,627
2,803
Pacioretty is not being moved in a deal for RNH

Defensively : Patches = RNH
Offensively : Patches >>> RNH

The fact that RNH is a center and Pacioretty a winger does not cover the offensive difference between the two.

Contract status for me is equal has Pacioretty only 2 years but RNH salary is way too much.

For me, a 1 vs 1 swap would be fair if there was salary retained on RNH's contract, like 1M$/year. If no retention, Oilers need to add.
 

Kobe Armstrong

Registered User
Jul 26, 2011
15,048
5,897
C>W. Edmonton certainly wouldn't be adding **** - especially with RNH having 4 years left on his contract.

C>W when the players have comparable skill level, that's not the case with Pacioretty and RNH. Just because he's a center doesn't mean he automatically has more value, that line of thinking is ass backwards. Berglund>Tarasenko, right??? I mean he is a center...

Pacioretty + Byron for RNH + Sekera

Throw in Davidson if you want him. Byron would be money on the Oilers, he had 22 goals and 43 points last year and makes 1.1 million for 2 more seasons.

Pacioretty and Byron combined for 110 points last season while making 5.6 million total, and they're signed for 2 more years.

Edmonton saves 6 million annually for the next few years and gets the best player in the deal, Montreal improves their two biggest areas of need, even though Sekera is injured for the first half of the season. Edmonton doesn't even really need Sekera anymore as they have Klefbom, Russel, and Nurse down the left side.
 

ChaoticOrange

Registered User
Jun 29, 2008
50,553
29,191
Edmonton
C>W when the players have comparable skill level, that's not the case with Pacioretty and RNH. Just because he's a center doesn't mean he automatically has more value, that line of thinking is ass backwards. Berglund>Tarasenko, right??? I mean he is a center...

Pacioretty + Byron for RNH + Sekera

Throw in Davidson if you want him. Byron would be money on the Oilers, he had 22 goals and 43 points last year and makes 1.1 million for 2 more seasons.

Pacioretty and Byron combined for 110 points last season while making 5.6 million total, and they're signed for 2 more years.

Edmonton saves 6 million annually for the next few years and gets the best player in the deal, Montreal improves their two biggest areas of need, even though Sekera is injured for the first half of the season. Edmonton doesn't even really need Sekera anymore as they have Klefbom, Russel, and Nurse down the left side.

Edmonton isn't trading a top six C and a top 4 D for two wingers we don't especially need.
 

Riptide

Registered User
Dec 29, 2011
38,887
6,520
Yukon
But his salary is horrible, so is contract status does what to his value??

Not really. Sure he's not a #1C like it was hoped he'd be when he was drafted and when he signed that contract, but he is a young skilled #2C. But then he's also not paid as a #1C. RyJo & Kuznetsov both just signed for ~8m. #2Cs cost between 5-6m (Dubinsky, Johnson, etc).

Is his contract a little high? Sure... but not nearly to the extent that some are suggesting.
 

Captain97

Registered User
Jan 31, 2017
7,619
7,188
Toronto, Ontario
The add on RNH would have to be enormous to get Patches. He is one of the top goal scorers in the NHL, I believe second in even strength goals over the past 5 years. And has received many selke votes. He is horribly underrated on this board.
 

Spearmint Rhino

Registered User
Sep 17, 2013
8,887
8,585
Not really. Sure he's not a #1C like it was hoped he'd be when he was drafted and when he signed that contract, but he is a young skilled #2C. But then he's also not paid as a #1C. RyJo & Kuznetsov both just signed for ~8m. #2Cs cost between 5-6m (Dubinsky, Johnson, etc).

Is his contract a little high? Sure... but not nearly to the extent that some are suggesting.

RNH is a great #3C but on the low end of #2s, Habs already have a $6MM #3C, we don't need another one
 

Spearmint Rhino

Registered User
Sep 17, 2013
8,887
8,585
He might be on the lower end of #2Cs... but that still means he's a #2C - something Montreal doesn't have.

Chucky and Danault can fight over #2C if that's the case, we need someone who can be on the low end of a #1 if Pacs is on the move, worst case a high end #2
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->