Legion34
Registered User
- Jan 24, 2006
- 17,982
- 8,087
First of all, I used to validate credit risk models and I know from experience that the models require calibration every 3 years or so. You cant make the claim of the veracity of a model of it has been changed and that sample size sounds like years. Smells like bs to me.
He predicted 250 contracts. This summer. Not 3 years Ago. No one is saying it’s perfect. I’m. Saying that all of the comparables fit Nylander there.
You should know that converging lines of evidence indicate a pretty fair. It seems like a pretty fair deal based on all the actual evidence. What’s the issue?