well last night was a good reminder of how this fan base is capable of perpetrating riots.
my take
-i second guess green a little for chasing the win, but i also try to defer to his experience and situational awareness. i do not fully grasp how the code would allow that hit to pass because matheson does not have a history and/or it was a close game in the third. i do not grok the decision.
-afaik neither guddy nor roussel nor schaller were on the ice. so if green called them off on the bench i blame none of them at all even a tiny bit. roussel gets a bonus pass coming off a concussion himself.
-the guys on the ice are the ones who owe an explanation, assuming they saw it.
-the way this place went from supposed rational analytics hothouse that routinely ridicules signing anyone for physical/fighting ability to instantly demanding blood to ferociously attacking those who didn't deliver blood was quite an education for me. next time someone claims we don't need a gudbranson in the modern nhl they had best explain who they expected to draw the blood they demanded.
-folks using this as an opportunity to attack benning, gudbranson i guess can have their day but i see no point proven. nobody ever once said gudbranson would 100% prevent these events happening, but it definitely did not stop it from happening on this occasion.
100% agree on your comment on Green.
All players that play the physical game deserve equal blame, they should have attempted to follow through with each and every hit. IF Green instructed them to not retaliate...they shouldn't be singled out.
100% put more blame with the guys on the ice, embarrassing.
Here's where we disagree...some posters want blood and I can understand. However, most people want heart, not blood, and wanted to see some emotional response through hits, checks and overall physicality. These 'tougher' guys benning brought in were supposedly hired for that and other 'intangibles'. They were supposed to set the tone and utilize their size, be the example for our young guys to emulate. Tossing off the term 'Mentorship' happens more often here than when pornhub VIP is free for the week. I think people are pissed because all the BS we were given is revealling itself and the stench is worse than ever.
These same people don't want plugs like Gud and most don't want blood, they want players with skill and they expect those players to play with heart. Nobody wants goons but if you are gonna add physical players, don't BS us and acquire guys that only care about prolonging their careers, these older guys have three priorities and that's longevity($), family and their retirement. They wont risk this for a team that is close to the bottom of the league. They have no skin in the game and they don't have the same affiliation to this team like our own players who sweat and bleed to get a chance to play for the team that drafted them. A physical player WOULD have upped his physical game and could have done so within the rules. The physicality on display after Pete went down was just verification of what most were saying...size does not equal less injuries, mentorship is overblown with these acquisitions and they will not protect our young guys from being targeted.
You're last statement, I could be wrong, but I believe benning did say exactly that. The players he acquired like Gud and the most expensive 4th line in the NHL will help protect our younger players and insulate them from being targeted. Hoping someone can find a quote to put an end to this argument.
On the other hand, when you say, 'nobody said' to include other posters on HF, than I can guarantee that it has been preached multiple times as part of their argument that the above mentioned players were savvy acquisitions.