Why do we put so much stock in "draft lists"? If Sakic and Co think he's just what we need at #16, he's worth the 16th pick. I'm quite stoked tbh. He has a great attitude and plays the game with enthusiasm. I take our scouting departments view of Kaut over any analyst. I'm cautiously optimistic but ultimately optimistic. Living in Loveland, I can't wait to see this kid on the ice for the Eagles.
There's nothing wrong with "taking stock" in lists from people who put in the work, no one is treating it as scripture. It's just one guide created by one guy, he qualifies it as such. Picks/predictions go awry all the time, but it makes for fun debate. All I can say is I think better players were on the board at the time, but again, that's my opinion, influenced by what I've read/heard over the past few months. And even if that's true, that doesn't make it a bad pick. It's only a bad pick if the player doesn't pan out.