Value of: Marner for a top pair RD

HockeyWooot

Registered User
Jan 28, 2020
2,323
1,900
Leon Draisaitl's cap hit is 8.5mill, so that's an additional 2.4mill. 2.4mill is the difference between paying an average 3-3.5mill player & a 5.5-5.9mill good/star level player. Nothing to scoff at.

That’s correct, but the reality is having an overpriced contract will be less attractive to a good number of teams that build their team with depth at all positions (ie playoff teams, contenders).

In a vacuum not considering contract I’m pretty sure every team in the league would be interested in Marner. However with that contract, the market for him will be decreased.

Also if the return is solely a top line D, not futures, again the number of teams that could realistically trade for him is a shorter list.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gianni

Mickey Marner

Registered User
Jul 9, 2014
19,303
20,818
Dystopia
His contract isn't great, but when you consider:

a) His actually salary remaining is only about 7 million per season, which makes him attractive to owners

b) He'd be the best forward traded straight up for a defenseman since Brendan Shanahan a quarter century ago

c) The cost of RD on hf is about 2x more than in real life.

There would be plenty of suitors if Dubas were to shop him, but I doubt he does.
 

Dick Whitman

Registered User
Feb 15, 2008
5,620
81
Ottawa
His contract isn't great, but when you consider:

a) His actually salary remaining is only about 7 million per season, which makes him attractive to owners

b) He'd be the best forward traded straight up for a defenseman since Brendan Shanahan a quarter century ago

c) The cost of RD on hf is about 2x more than in real life.

There would be plenty of suitors if Dubas were to shop him, but I doubt he does.

The challenge the leafs would have would be to find a suitor that has a) the cap space to take on Marner's hit and b) the pieces toronto would want in return, and is actually available. How many teams out there satisfy both requirements? Very few, if any, so I don't think there would be 'plenty of suitors' as you say
 

Unbiased Fan

Registered User
May 24, 2019
3,632
1,608
When was the last time a player with a $7m+ cap hit was traded? (Weber/Subban aside) At $10+ million, he's not movable, it's just too big of a hit.
Clearly you never heard of inflation....Scott Gomez held a higher cap hit percentage then Marner.
 

Legion34

Registered User
Jan 24, 2006
18,094
8,217
Taylor Hall was traded for Adam Larsson.


Taylor Hall was traded for Adam Larsson.

In his last 2 years marner has 161pts in 141 games. He has had a high ankle sprain and a minor shoulder injury in 4 years

marner has 1.14ppg in his last 2 years

taylor hall was coming off 38 pts in 52 games and a 60 pt season and had multiple injuries almost every year.

taylor hall was no where near where marner is at the time of the trade.
 

Samsquanch

Raging Bull Squatch
Nov 28, 2008
8,224
4,965
Sudbury
It’s got to be someone with as bad a contract as Marner, obviously.


Erik Karlsson.

Hate it as a Sens fan, but this is actually not the worst idea. Dubas wants to run and gun his way to a cup, and Karlsson is without a doubt still elite at doing that.

This does not help them keep the puck out of the net, at all. But its going to give them a 25 min/night RHD that can and will get the puck up the ice to those forward$ of theirs. And maybe help them avoid getting shutout by middling teams in the future.

SJ gets some much needed youth and firepower, and escapes from one of two bad long term contracts they have for a right handed offensive dman...wtf were they thinking, seriously.

Karlsson gets to move closer his wife's home city, and Marner gets to go to a cool city in California. Everyone can walk away fairly happy here in actuality.
 
Last edited:

ole ole

Registered User
Oct 7, 2017
11,937
6,021
In his last 2 years marner has 161pts in 141 games. He has had a high ankle sprain and a minor shoulder injury in 4 years

marner has 1.14ppg in his last 2 years

taylor hall was coming off 38 pts in 52 games and a 60 pt season and had multiple injuries almost every year.

taylor hall was no where near where marner is at the time of the trade.
We all get that Marner is an awesome pt producer but where the problems lies is the playoffs.
Till he brings that same play come playoff time his value diminishes and than you have to add on that contract.
If your going to pay out big contracts you want the player to be able to step up come playoffs.
 

Dion TheFluff

Registered User
Jun 22, 2015
3,890
3,338
Marner's cap hit is a problem in and of itself. He's a really good young player, but is getting paid like a Superstar who has won multiple Cups (i.e. Kane). Most teams do not want to, or can't, deal with that.

Trade for Skinner and the #8. Salaries are close. Pick Sanderson or Drysdale with the #8.
Marner holds far more value than the 8th overall pick and when you factor in taking on a cap dump like Skinner, its not even close.
 

viceroy

Registered User
Mar 5, 2011
1,752
799
Montreal suburbs
Subban is horrible. He is too busy posting on IG and Tik Tok

He's got to get away from his WSD.

If teams are cash strapped, they may look to add salary to deals if they are worth while to the Leafs.

11 million bud. Even at 7 million it's crazy to wholly take on dry. Also remember flat cap AND a lot of teams have internal caps.

Marner as RW #1 and Caufield as RW #2 looks really nice.

Where do you stick Gallagher then?

Why not for Echiel? "...
is getting paid like a Superstar who has won multiple Cups (i.e. Kane)."

A. Eichel's a Centre.
B. Eichel makes almost a million less per year.
C. Eichel's contract is 2 years longer and thus covers more UFA years.

Scott Gomez held a higher cap hit percentage then Marner.

Jebus. So Gomez is a comparable, but Scott was a Centre of course. As a Habs fan just remembering that Gomez contract makes me shiver.

Paying your best players is never a problem.

When Marner challenges for an Art Ross there is going to be a lot of bad takes around here.

Of course paying your best players is a problem if they're redundant. Of course paying your best players is a problem if it destroys your pay structure. Of course paying your best players is a problem if you're handing out contracts before those aforementioned players have accomplished anything and thus sap them of drive and ambition.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: 57special

b in vancouver

Registered User
Jul 28, 2005
7,844
5,694
The cap hit is tough to take. You look at teams like Philly, Carolina, Boston, etc. that are stacked with good young defence men - but Marner's contract just throws everything out of whack. I understand he isn't owed nearly as much money as his hit but it's tough to think of teams that can afford to trade away a first pairing d-man and afford that kind of hit.
Does he get you a guy of Werenski or Chabot's level? I really like Marner but he's going to be tough to move.
 

A1LeafNation

Obsession beats talent everytime!!
Oct 17, 2010
27,332
17,259
We all get that Marner is an awesome pt producer but where the problems lies is the playoffs.
Till he brings that same play come playoff time his value diminishes and than you have to add on that contract.
If your going to pay out big contracts you want the player to be able to step up come playoffs.
He's the Leafs top point producer in the playoffs.

What are you talking about lol?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad