Marleau vs Mogilny

Marleau vs Mogilny


  • Total voters
    99

frog

Registered User
Apr 8, 2014
2,429
1,450
Canada
Mogilny was still as good as in his prime during the leafs years. Marleau is on his last lap
 

Beaninfritz

Registered User
Aug 27, 2009
901
192
Even with a bummed hip, Mogilny and Sundin were killer when paired up shorthanded.
 

phillipmike

Registered User
Oct 27, 2009
12,513
8,324
Mogilny was dynamite if you are comparing the two at exclusively their Leaf tenure.

But it's unfair because you are comparing Mogilny's 32-34 seasons to Marleau's 38-40.

Mogilny played until he was 36. Marleau is 39 and still playing.
 

Suntouchable13

Registered User
Dec 20, 2003
43,262
18,472
Toronto, ON
I think that over their careers, Mogilny was the better player. Mogilny was also the better pickup even though he did miss a lot of games for us. He led the Leafs in scoring his second year in Toronto. I doubt Patty will do that any time soon.
 

Boutette

Been there done that
Sep 28, 2017
2,991
1,056
More like a poor man's Roberts, really. he's about as effective as Robert's was towards the end of his tenure with the Leafs.
 

Boutette

Been there done that
Sep 28, 2017
2,991
1,056
Mogilny was dynamite if you are comparing the two at exclusively their Leaf tenure.

But it's unfair because you are comparing Mogilny's 32-34 seasons to Marleau's 38-40.

Mogilny played until he was 36. Marleau is 39 and still playing.

True, but Mogilny's body was falling apart. Would you really argue that his 32-34 body was in better shape than Marleau's 38-40?
 
Last edited:

phillipmike

Registered User
Oct 27, 2009
12,513
8,324
True, but Mogilny's body was falling apart. Would you really argue that his 32-34 body was in better shape than Marleau 38-40?

No, I'm arguing Prime years. Marleaus 32-34 was much more productive than what he has put up now for obvious reasons.
 

Boutette

Been there done that
Sep 28, 2017
2,991
1,056
No, I'm arguing Prime years. Marleaus 32-34 was much more productive than what he has put up now for obvious reasons.

Even at 36, Mogilny was scoring at a 75% PPG rate. Marleau settled at under 60% at 36 and has been there ever since. Roberts is a better comparison.
 

Its not your fault

Registered User
Nov 24, 2016
1,737
472
Mogilny did more with way less talent to shelter or play with. If he played 2 or 3 extra years perfurably when he was younger and not 36 37 38. Might have been an all time favorite leaf player. This comparison starts with the same first letters in their last names and ends with the same amount of letters in their last names. Also Tavaras signs with this team regardless of Marleau on it or not. Mogilny was 1B TO Sundin. As of right now Sundin was a better player then Matthews is probably change that statement after this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pocket Hercules

LeafsNation75

Registered User
Jan 15, 2010
37,975
12,506
Toronto, Ontario
Mogilny was 1B TO Sundin. As of right now Sundin was a better player then Matthews is probably change that statement after this year.
I remember when Mogilny signed a lot of Leafs fans were freaking out because they had done nothing in free agency up until that point because they didn't sign him until July 3, 2001.
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
not a close comp.

Mogilny was still a legit 1st line ppg player.
 

Pocket Hercules

Business in the front, party in the back.
Jun 19, 2008
6,747
1,429
York Region
Mogilny...easy choice. Even past his prime during his Leaf tenure, Mogilny was still considered a dangerous sniper.
 

Buds17

Registered User
Nov 29, 2015
8,237
3,357
Apples and oranges. Mogilny was still younger by the end of his Leaf tenure than Marleau was at the start of his. Mogilny gets my vote, but they're both solid acquisitions.
 

phillipmike

Registered User
Oct 27, 2009
12,513
8,324
Even at 36, Mogilny was scoring at a 75% PPG rate. Marleau settled at under 60% at 36 and has been there ever since. Roberts is a better comparison.

Only 34 games. Mogilny was a better player in his prime. Marleau provides more value at this age because he is actually playing the games.
 

Wendelstache

Registered User
May 5, 2010
9,862
3,781
Mogilny was dynamite if you are comparing the two at exclusively their Leaf tenure.

But it's unfair because you are comparing Mogilny's 32-34 seasons to Marleau's 38-40.

Mogilny played until he was 36. Marleau is 39 and still playing.

Mogilny had no cartilage his knees, crippled Mogilny was arguably our beat player.
 

BM14

Registered User
Dec 7, 2012
5,970
3,972
GTA
Not comparable.

Mogilny was by far the more impactful player, taking nothing away from Marleau who has been great both on the ice and in the room.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tracer Bullet

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad