I'm dense? I asked for a dictionary that uses your definition and you send me to a site where any romper room reject can go and make an entry.
Seeing as you had to revert to insults I'm guessing you didn't find a dictionary that had your definition and are trying to blow smoke my way so you can make a quick exit.
Ok, I retract the ''dense'' statement since you take it so seriously. I believed specifying that ''dense'' being a temporary (today) and not permanent status, combined with the laughing face would lighten it up but clearly it didn't work.
On the other hand I think the dissing of wikipedia is a bit unfair . Its good source that is supported by a growing number of teachers, even at university.
Hockey articles and writer often refer to journeyman players as players who play with multiple teams, organisations. This is common use, the article says ''X is a journeyman player, he's also played for Y, Z, T and V teams in his tumultuous career''. Its how language evolve, the basic definition of journeyman hardly fits with hockey. Make it ''average hockey player with no attachment who sells his service to the highest bidder'' and it gets closer.
Beaker said:
I thought this was a thread about how a heavyweight fighter could've avoided Emelin's injury.
Its equally as stupid.
Carry on.
And pointless.