Ansar Khan: Mantha's Arrival could be Quick

SirloinUB

Registered User
Aug 20, 2010
4,665
2,154
Canada
How?

Team too healthy.


I think Pulkinnen should be ahead of Mantha for a call up, in the event of any fwd injuries.

1) The clock is ticking until Pulks is Waiver Eligible.
2) He has proven more.
3) He has tenure with the organization.
4) Kind of relating to #1, but we have lots time to integrate and evaluate Mantha. Pulu? Not so much.
 

Laser Rayzor

Cautiously Optimistic
Dec 8, 2012
4,256
32
The Underground
How?

Team too healthy.

That's part of my problem with this, why does Mantha get a spot cleared for him but Pulu has to wait for injuries?
If Holland is willing to actually be a GM and make roster space for a up and comer IMO first crack at that spot should go the guy who's over PPG in the AHL now (on a team that had a terrible start) and was a 30 goal scorer there last year (as a rookie) over the guy who's played a whopping 5 pro games. If Pulu falters give Mantha a try.

Now before I get run over by the Mantha hype train, I am a big fan of Mantha and in fact I'll eat my hat if he isn't a better player than Pulu in the long term. It's just that with Pulu being very productive in GR and the fact that his waiver exemption runs out this season I just don't see why he'd be below Mantha on the totem pole.
 

Flowah

Registered User
Nov 30, 2009
10,249
547
Neither of them have any room unless we have injuries. Seriously. Who are we going to healthy scratch for him? Miller? Glendening? Jurco?

Absolutely safe from my point of view are D, Z, Nyquist, Franzen, Tats, Abby, Helm, Glendening, Sheahan. Maybe Miller, maybe Weiss if he reverts. Jurco MAYBE? Most of the forwards are playing too well to bench. This isn't like the past couple years where we had a bunch of hangers on who were too slow and too unproductive.
 

hyduK

Registered User
Feb 21, 2009
2,593
584
Neither of them have any room unless we have injuries. Seriously. Who are we going to healthy scratch for him? Miller? Glendening? Jurco?

Absolutely safe from my point of view are D, Z, Nyquist, Franzen, Tats, Abby, Helm, Glendening, Sheahan. Maybe Miller, maybe Weiss if he reverts. Jurco MAYBE? Most of the forwards are playing too well to bench. This isn't like the past couple years where we had a bunch of hangers on who were too slow and too unproductive.

Yeah, I'm pretty interested to see what the plan for next year will be....
 

Laser Rayzor

Cautiously Optimistic
Dec 8, 2012
4,256
32
The Underground
Neither of them have any room unless we have injuries. Seriously. Who are we going to healthy scratch for him? Miller? Glendening? Jurco?

Absolutely safe from my point of view are D, Z, Nyquist, Franzen, Tats, Abby, Helm, Glendening, Sheahan. Maybe Miller, maybe Weiss if he reverts. Jurco MAYBE? Most of the forwards are playing too well to bench. This isn't like the past couple years where we had a bunch of hangers on who were too slow and too unproductive.

No argument here that there's no space right now for either but the implication that Mantha has surpassed Pulkkinen as next in line for a call up (for offensive forwards) slightly rustles my jimmies.
 

The Zetterberg Era

Ball Hockey Sucks
Nov 8, 2011
40,980
11,621
Ft. Myers, FL
Interesting turn of events, there has been a constant anger of the Wings not considering this type of thing. Yes right now it would appear we don't have the space, but I find it encouraging this is how they think.

On Pulkkinen I have long believed that Babs sees no place for all of Nyquist, Pulkkinen and Tatar to be deployed at once in the lineup. They are too small for him, I disagree, but that is my take on what he thinks from the little glimpses he gives when talking about them. Mantha has a big cheerleader in Babcock fighting for this case and I think Holland sees him as the most physically mature prospect they have had since Primeau which was eluded to by Khan and I have said a couple times in the Griffins and prospect thread. Remember they weren't adverse to moving earlier on the last really dynamic physically mature prospect along in Fischer either.
 

SirloinUB

Registered User
Aug 20, 2010
4,665
2,154
Canada
Interesting turn of events, there has been a constant anger of the Wings not considering this type of thing. Yes right now it would appear we don't have the space, but I find it encouraging this is how they think.

On Pulkkinen I have long believed that Babs sees no place for all of Nyquist, Pulkkinen and Tatar to be deployed at once in the lineup. They are too small for him, I disagree, but that is my take on what he thinks from the little glimpses he gives when talking about them. Mantha has a big cheerleader in Babcock fighting for this case and I think Holland sees him as the most physically mature prospect they have had since Primeau which was eluded to by Khan and I have said a couple times in the Griffins and prospect thread. Remember they weren't adverse to moving earlier on the last really dynamic physically mature prospect along in Fischer either.

Even if Babs sees no place for the three minions, we need to get Pulks some NHL time. At least we can generate some Trade Value, or, See if we have an acceptable replacement for Tatar/Nyquist in the event a Trade comes up.

Simply put, Pulks needs to be first in line for a call up.
 
Jul 30, 2005
17,690
4,634
I mean, what is location, really
is the title a Jonathan Quick pun?

But seriously, I'd like to see Pulkkinen get a shot first. At minimum, it would really help them find a trade partner for him. That way, Mantha can take over Pulkkinen's role a little bit and that should help him properly adapt. I mean, he's not even drawing top AHL pairings yet. He's got a bit more to do before he's done with the AHL.
 

newfy

Registered User
Jul 28, 2010
14,771
8,326
I think the way Jurco is playing and Weiss all of a sudden this might not happen but I think it should happen. As for Pulkkinen coming up first, I think the wings are a decent threat for the first time in a while and they should bring up whover they think will make them better for a playoff run so they can gel with the team
 

Hendricks433

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
1,080
0
Why are people so worried about his RFA status. If he can play in the NHL and produce you bring him up. People having Kenny Holland syndrome in here.

The biggest problems is too many forwards and you still have Pulks tearing up the AHL as well.

Z, Dats, Mantha
Tatar, Sheahan, Abs
Franzen, Weiss, Nyquist
Miller, Glendening, Helm

What do you do with Jurco? There's no one else to scratch. We would have said Abs last year but he's honestly improved and proven himself.

A trade is gonna have to be made here. We are going to have the same problem on defense with Marchenko getting healthy and Jensen pretty much being ready.
 

lilidk

Registered User
Mar 4, 2008
9,788
3,549
is he ahead of Pulku and AA? And who he can replace , unless we trade Tatar + Kindle for #1 Defensemen
 

Hendricks433

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
1,080
0
I think this is why some of us are willing to part with Tatar as much as I love him as a player. I refuse to part with Nyquist and there's really no one else to trade that has value.

Trade Tats+ Big E for an upgrade and a combo of Jurco, Mantha and Pulks can replace him. Still have AA2 impressing as well. Nosek looked very impressive before his injury too.
 

Hendricks433

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
1,080
0
It still doesn't make room for anyone in the line up. They're being scratched already. You don't bring up Mantha or Pulks to sit or sit anyone currently playing.
 

Chance on Chance

Registered User
Jul 15, 2009
2,851
0
Canada
Interesting turn of events, there has been a constant anger of the Wings not considering this type of thing. Yes right now it would appear we don't have the space, but I find it encouraging this is how they think.

On Pulkkinen I have long believed that Babs sees no place for all of Nyquist, Pulkkinen and Tatar to be deployed at once in the lineup. They are too small for him, I disagree, but that is my take on what he thinks from the little glimpses he gives when talking about them. Mantha has a big cheerleader in Babcock fighting for this case and I think Holland sees him as the most physically mature prospect they have had since Primeau which was eluded to by Khan and I have said a couple times in the Griffins and prospect thread. Remember they weren't adverse to moving earlier on the last really dynamic physically mature prospect along in Fischer either.

but what if he's not here next year? Either way were gonna be crowded on offense and defense and Holland will have to swing a trade
 

detredWINgs

Registered User
Jan 1, 2004
17,966
0
Michigan
Visit site
Interesting turn of events, there has been a constant anger of the Wings not considering this type of thing. Yes right now it would appear we don't have the space, but I find it encouraging this is how they think.

On Pulkkinen I have long believed that Babs sees no place for all of Nyquist, Pulkkinen and Tatar to be deployed at once in the lineup. They are too small for him, I disagree, but that is my take on what he thinks from the little glimpses he gives when talking about them. Mantha has a big cheerleader in Babcock fighting for this case and I think Holland sees him as the most physically mature prospect they have had since Primeau which was eluded to by Khan and I have said a couple times in the Griffins and prospect thread. Remember they weren't adverse to moving earlier on the last really dynamic physically mature prospect along in Fischer either.

There's no "turn of events." Although it's never been put in black and white terms, the majority of this board seems to view 22 as the magic number in most cases. Guys under 22 who don't even have a years worth of pro experience aren't going to rile people up by staying in the AHL. It's when you're entering your third or 4th non-NHL pro year or are pushing 23 and have barely seen any NHL time that people get antsy.
 

davecrockburn

Registered User
Jun 8, 2011
166
10
No points again tonight. I think we are getting ahead of ourselves with Mantha. He still needs to produce in the AHL (even if its a short time) before we consider bringing him up. No doubt he is amazing but its not like he is tearing it up and its not like we are hurting for top 6 fwds right now.
 

DanZ

Registered User
Mar 6, 2008
14,495
31
No points again tonight. I think we are getting ahead of ourselves with Mantha. He still needs to produce in the AHL (even if its a short time) before we consider bringing him up. No doubt he is amazing but its not like he is tearing it up and its not like we are hurting for top 6 fwds right now.

Agreed. Pulkinnen should come up before Mantha
 
Jul 30, 2005
17,690
4,634
I mean, what is location, really
No points again tonight. I think we are getting ahead of ourselves with Mantha. He still needs to produce in the AHL (even if its a short time) before we consider bringing him up. No doubt he is amazing but its not like he is tearing it up and its not like we are hurting for top 6 fwds right now.
Eh, no worries. It takes guys a while to find consistency in their first pro season. But he also wasn't on the first line or first PP unit tonight that I saw, so that's not going to help him score tons of goals.
 

Cyborg Yzerberg

Registered User
Nov 8, 2007
11,152
2,372
Philadelphia
The fact that Jurco is on the 4th line, and producing, and Weiss has rebounded in the way that he has tells me there is no space for him. Unless we drop Abdelkader and Helm down to the 4th line and bump out Miller or Glendening, I don't see a spot for him. Realistically we have 10 guys that can play in the top 9 with varying degrees of success.
Zetterberg, Datsyuk, Nyquist, Franzen, Tatar, Sheahan, Weiss, Abdelkader, Jurco, and Helm. And then there's the case of Teemu Pulkkinen who has actually EARNED his time with Detroit with his exemplary play the last two seasons in Grand Rapids. As evidenced by my avatar, I'm a big fan of Mantha, but there's simply no room, and simply no good reason for him to be ahead of Pulkkinen on the depth chart.(yet)

Abdelkader and Helm would be exemplary 4th line players, but Babs likes them in the top 6. Jurco's on the 4th line because of it. Pulkkinen should absolutely be a day 1 player next year. Something will have to give soon.
 

PelagicJoe

Registered User
Mar 20, 2012
2,147
574
St. Louis, MO
Neither of them have any room unless we have injuries. Seriously. Who are we going to healthy scratch for him? Miller? Glendening? Jurco?

Absolutely safe from my point of view are D, Z, Nyquist, Franzen, Tats, Abby, Helm, Glendening, Sheahan. Maybe Miller, maybe Weiss if he reverts. Jurco MAYBE? Most of the forwards are playing too well to bench. This isn't like the past couple years where we had a bunch of hangers on who were too slow and too unproductive.

This was going to be my question as well. I'd say Miller or Glendening would be the odd man out, or Helm since it's only a matter of time before he tweaks something after a hard sneeze.
 

Claypool

Registered User
Jan 12, 2009
13,670
4,352
I think this is why some of us are willing to part with Tatar as much as I love him as a player. I refuse to part with Nyquist and there's really no one else to trade that has value.

Trade Tats+ Big E for an upgrade and a combo of Jurco, Mantha and Pulks can replace him. Still have AA2 impressing as well. Nosek looked very impressive before his injury too.

Tatar is going to score 25-30 goals this season and is on a great 3-year deal. You don't deal players like that. This team finally has scoring depth, the kind of depth you need to compete for a Cup.

Given the injury history of Datsyuk, Zetterberg, and Frazen, I think it's too risky to trade any young forwards right now. I say you ride the season out with Pulkkinen. See where he's at during training camp. Maybe he can steal a roster spot next year.
 

Outl4w

Registered User
Dec 16, 2011
3,365
1,854
FL
I think Pukky gets first call. We need his cannon on the pp more than size/skill. Sheahan has really stepped up his game.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad