Management Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bleach Clean

Registered User
Aug 9, 2006
27,018
6,585
Do we know any of that is actually taking place though? Why would he be marginalized if he's the scouting force we all think is he. Look at his recent track record, it doesn't make any sense.


There are multiple sourced rumours regarding this marginalization taking place. We will never truly know, but that’s as legitimate as it gets without direct intel. And now the rumour of him leaving to corroborate it...

As to it not making sense: Exactly. This marginalization does not itself make sense. The departure makes sense because it’s akin to wrongful dismissal, but the impetus to subvert Brackett’s veto further does not make sense. That part is wonky and only BennBrod could explain it.

For some reason, Benning has found Brackett’s performance at the draft table wanting. This with a shortage of picks and a thinly rebuilt core in 5 years. Maybe he thinks he can do better? It’s puzzling that the one area Benning eludes criticism for is the one area he alters. Benning gonna Benning, I suppose.

I actually think this is a good thing. I was expecting it to happen. Let’s see how the super scout does? This only furthers the criticism heaped upon his name.
 
Last edited:

Bleach Clean

Registered User
Aug 9, 2006
27,018
6,585
If i'm the owner of the Canucks, with their drafting history, I'm holding on to anyone who has improved it. A GM's shelf life is finite. Jim Benning won't be here forever. You want to step in and keep a sharp scout like Brackett so that the improved scouting will continue even with a GM change.


If you’re Brackett, can you accurately predict if/when Benning will be fired? It would be extremely difficult given recent history. This is a GM that should have been fired many times over due to incompetence, yet he remains? Not only that, but he remained beyond the president who previously carried ultimate power in hockey ops??

Clearly, there exists a pact of mutual benefit between GM and Owner right now. One that is not easily dismissed or contained to a resume of merit. If it had been, then I could see Brackett staying on. As is, better to get out fast.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: racerjoe

F A N

Registered User
Aug 12, 2005
18,698
5,938
Goes to show how highly LA views if him if they think he's pro-ready. Gonna suck watching him do well there.

Well he has had two great years in college. The question is whether he's better off playing another year in college given his slight build.
 

Megaterio Llamas

el rey del mambo
Oct 29, 2011
11,220
5,929
North Shore
There are multiple sourced rumours regarding this marginalization taking place. We will never truly know, but that’s as legitimate as it gets without direct intel. And now the rumour of him leaving to corroborate it...

As to it not making sense: Exactly. This marginalization does not itself make sense. The departures makes sense because it’s akin to being a wrongful dismissal, but the impetus to subvert Brackett’s veto further does not make sense. That part is wonky and only BennBrod could explain.

For some reason, Benning has found Brackett’s performance at the draft table wanting. This with a shortage of picks and a thinly rebuilt core in 5 years. Maybe he thinks he can do better? It’s puzzling that the one area Benning eludes criticism for is the one area he alters. Benning gonna Benning.

I actually think this is a good thing. I was expecting it to happen. Let’s see what the super scout does? This only furthers the criticism heaped upon his name.
Actually despite everything that's going on around us I did happen to catch the recent newspaper story that mentioned Brackett had rejected a contract offer. Hopefully it's nothing more than good ol' contract negotiation hardball and they settle it in the end. Otherwise I guess it's thanks for all you've done Judd, it's been a hell of a ride.

My only hope is that Mr Aquilini doesn't take over Judd's responsibilities the way he has done Trev's. The man is a force, no doubt. But even geniuses like Mr Aquilini have their limitations.
 

Frankie Blueberries

Allergic to draft picks
Jan 27, 2016
9,150
10,629
Actually despite everything that's going on around us I did happen to catch the recent newspaper story that mentioned Brackett had rejected a contract offer. Hopefully it's nothing more than good ol' contract negotiation hardball and they settle it in the end. Otherwise I guess it's thanks for all you've done Judd, it's been a hell of a ride.

My only hope is that Mr Aquilini doesn't take over Judd's responsibilities the way he has done Trev's. The man is a force, no doubt. But even geniuses like Mr Aquilini have their limitations.


source.gif


This reads like some terrible fan fic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I am toxic

Megaterio Llamas

el rey del mambo
Oct 29, 2011
11,220
5,929
North Shore
source.gif


This reads like some terrible fan fic.
Team owner/director. President of hockey operations, heads up the crack team of technical specialists in the highly secretive cap compliance lab deep within the bowels of Rogers Arena, and now possibly director of scouting too? I don't know what else we can call this man but polymath. Renaissance Man. A Man For All Seasons.

I am truly awed by his apparently limitless abilities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I am toxic

Frankie Blueberries

Allergic to draft picks
Jan 27, 2016
9,150
10,629
Team owner/director. President of hockey operations, heads up the crack team of technical specialists in the highly secretive cap compliance lab deep within the bowels of Rogers Arena, and now possibly director of scouting too? I don't know what else we can call this man but polymath. Renaissance Man. A Man For All Seasons.

I am truly awed by his apparently limitless abilities.

Ah, you're being facetious. Idiot that inherited a bunch of money just ran a successful hockey franchise into the ground.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I am toxic

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
22,102
14,026
Actually despite everything that's going on around us I did happen to catch the recent newspaper story that mentioned Brackett had rejected a contract offer. Hopefully it's nothing more than good ol' contract negotiation hardball and they settle it in the end. Otherwise I guess it's thanks for all you've done Judd, it's been a hell of a ride.

My only hope is that Mr Aquilini doesn't take over Judd's responsibilities the way he has done Trev's. The man is a force, no doubt. But even geniuses like Mr Aquilini have their limitations.
Isn’t the proper plural called “genii”? :huh:
 

Megaterio Llamas

el rey del mambo
Oct 29, 2011
11,220
5,929
North Shore
Green isn't the source of the problem. Replacing Green would only result in a negligble improvement (or even a decline if the wrong coach is brought in).
I really hope Mr Aquilini isn't planning to take over the coaching duties as well. Polymath though he may be, even a man with Mr Aquilini's diverse gifts needs some rest.
 

member 290103

Guest
Green isn't the source of the problem. Replacing Green would only result in a negligble improvement (or even a decline if the wrong coach is brought in).

Fire Benning and every person Benning personally brought in as management.
 

F A N

Registered User
Aug 12, 2005
18,698
5,938
Jake, Mcann, and OJ were clearly JB wants.

Benning being on board with those picks doesn't mean that Canucks scouts didn't have those players as BPAs I would say Virtanen and McCann fits into the type of players the Canucks were looking for under Crawford. Did you hear Gilman talk about Virtanen?

As for Juolevi, I personally think that as a draft-eligible prospect Juolevi fits Brackett's MO. High hockey IQ, skates well, moves the puck, plays with a ton of poise. Juolevi is the type of D prospect Brackett seemingly likes.
 

elitepete

Registered User
Jan 30, 2017
8,135
5,452
Vancouver
Benning being on board with those picks doesn't mean that Canucks scouts didn't have those players as BPAs I would say Virtanen and McCann fits into the type of players the Canucks were looking for under Crawford. Did you hear Gilman talk about Virtanen?

As for Juolevi, I personally think that as a draft-eligible prospect Juolevi fits Brackett's MO. High hockey IQ, skates well, moves the puck, plays with a ton of poise. Juolevi is the type of D prospect Brackett seemingly likes.
Juolevi was 100% Benning reaching for a dman. This I’m sure of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rypper and racerjoe

member 290103

Guest
Benning being on board with those picks doesn't mean that Canucks scouts didn't have those players as BPAs I would say Virtanen and McCann fits into the type of players the Canucks were looking for under Crawford. Did you hear Gilman talk about Virtanen?

As for Juolevi, I personally think that as a draft-eligible prospect Juolevi fits Brackett's MO. High hockey IQ, skates well, moves the puck, plays with a ton of poise. Juolevi is the type of D prospect Brackett seemingly likes.

Juolevi is on Benning. He watched him play a game at the WJC and overruled his scouts to make him their pick. It’s quite likely the worst pick in franchise history (certainly tied for it if anything). That’s quite the feat for a “master talent evaluator” like Jim.
 

F A N

Registered User
Aug 12, 2005
18,698
5,938
Did Benning originally hire Chris Gear? I don’t know much about him. I was mostly referring to himself and Weisbrod.

Well you said "Fire... every person Benning personally brought in as management." Chris Gear was brought in by Benning into the management team. Previously he was not part of the management team.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad