Frankie Blueberries
Allergic to draft picks
- Jan 27, 2016
- 9,149
- 10,628
Of course teardown rebuilds don’t always work, but what did we gain by not having one in 2014? 2015? 2016? And onward. The goal was to compete and they failed spectacularly, shedding picks to ‘improve’ in the present with little regard to the future.
Now we live in the future they’ve created and the only bright spots for the franchise are the high picks the team was given because the’d failed so impressively at competing.
The argument against the teardown rebuild is that you can end up with a losing culture. This team has been one of the worst in the league for nearly a decade and I can’t help but notice a seemingly disastrous start to this season.
So we didn’t do a teardown rebuild so that we could avoid... pretty much exactly what we are right now.
Would sure be nice to have all the young players we should have drafted over all these years instead of chasing butterflies.
Not to mention the fact that, for every failed tear down you can point to, you can also provide a successful one. Chicago, Pittsburgh, Washington, Tampa, etc.