Not really As history has shown us but okay. This thread is proof.I mean that's just hilariously wrong, but okay.
Not really As history has shown us but okay. This thread is proof.
Follow along. I’m referring to what this thread is about. I’m not talking in hockey termsYes, because the incredible minds of HF is an amazing way to judge players.
Calling Malkin a more talented version of Kessel is just a terrible take, there's no other way to describe it. It's just dumb and shows a fundamental lack of hockey knowledge. They're not even remotely similar players, outside of being line drivers.
Follow along. I’m referring to what this thread is about. I’m not talking in hockey terms
This. Malkin is just a more talented version of Kessel.
He’s a diva like Kessel but just far more talented
Follow along. I’m referring to what this thread is about. I’m not talking in hockey terms
He’s a diva like Kessel but just far more talented
Good point about Crosby, some others observed that too. The laundry hasn't been aired, and maybe better that way, but it's obvious the two rarely were on the same line.So, alot of flak being thrown towards Malkin in this thread, that he's a baby, etc. Yet no one even flinches at that Crosby refuses to play with Kessel on his line? So Crosby can set up such demands, but Malkin can't? Where's the logic behind that? What does it say about Kessel if both Crosby and Malkin refuse to play with him, because both feel he's a burden on their respective line?
And of course Kessel refuses to play on the 3rd line, he would be absolutely useless in such a role - and he knows it.
So, alot of flak being thrown towards Malkin in this thread, that he's a baby, etc. Yet no one even flinches at that Crosby refuses to play with Kessel on his line? So Crosby can set up such demands, but Malkin can't? Where's the logic behind that? What does it say about Kessel if both Crosby and Malkin refuse to play with him, because both feel he's a burden on their respective line?
And of course Kessel refuses to play on the 3rd line, he would be absolutely useless in such a role - and he knows it.
You'd think they'd want to keep as much talent as possible. Kessel was the main ingredient added that saw them win twice in a row. Malkin only had the one cup before that. In terms of competing I think it made more sense to compliment the existing group with a big move rather than push him out.
Sounds like someone who didn't watch Kessel play last year.
The problem here isn't on a personal level between the two, because Malkin and Kessel do get along well. The problem is that Malkin was tired of playing with Kessel and Malkin's wing was the only spot Kessel was going to play here (Crosby won't play with him and Kessel has *****ed about playing on the 3rd line before). There just wasn't a spot here for Kessel anymore, and if the Penguins were going to force Kessel to stay here, Malkin would rather go somewhere else because of the frustration that the Kessel situation brought on him.
I really don't blame Malkin for that at all. He was caught between a pissing contest between a hard headed coach and a stubborn, 1 dimensional player. He was away from both his family and his close friend in Gonchar. His play was subpar and was only made worse by Kessel's uselessness outside of his production. How can you possibly criticize him for blowing up in that kind of scenario?
I'm glad this article is out. Probably pretty therapeutic for Malkin. Hopefully we will see an energized Malkin, maybe even an Angry Geno, which freaking rocks!
I don't know. To me he sounded like a whiney baby that's blaming someone else and random **** for his sub par play last year.
And, what kind of "good friend" says he quits if his "good friend" comes back next year. I can do without a good friend like that.
Sounds like someone who didn't watch Kessel play last year.
The problem here isn't on a personal level between the two, because Malkin and Kessel do get along well. The problem is that Malkin was tired of playing with Kessel and Malkin's wing was the only spot Kessel was going to play here (Crosby won't play with him and Kessel has *****ed about playing on the 3rd line before). There just wasn't a spot here for Kessel anymore, and if the Penguins were going to force Kessel to stay here, Malkin would rather go somewhere else because of the frustration that the Kessel situation brought on him.
I really don't blame Malkin for that at all. He was caught between a pissing contest between a hard headed coach and a stubborn, 1 dimensional player. He was away from both his family and his close friend in Gonchar. His play was subpar and was only made worse by Kessel's uselessness outside of his production. How can you possibly criticize him for blowing up in that kind of scenario?
Is it weird to know so little and post it so proudly and publicly? You do know there are websites that track line deployment to the second that show you are completely and utter one million percent full of shit and have no clue how lines are set up in pitts.So, alot of flak being thrown towards Malkin in this thread, that he's a baby, etc. Yet no one even flinches at that Crosby refuses to play with Kessel on his line? So Crosby can set up such demands, but Malkin can't? Where's the logic behind that? What does it say about Kessel if both Crosby and Malkin refuse to play with him, because both feel he's a burden on their respective line?
And of course Kessel refuses to play on the 3rd line, he would be absolutely useless in such a role - and he knows it.
you really think no one tried to sit down with Kessel and say "stop turning the puck over. stop doing stupid shit. stop making terrible decisions with the puck. give some semblance of a f*** on defence"?... Which sounds exactly like something you could sit down and sort out.